232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1471216)
1. Non-genotoxic factors in the carcinogenetic process: problems of detection and hazard evaluation.
Parodi S; Malacarne D; Taningher M
Toxicol Lett; 1992 Dec; 64-65 Spec No():621-30. PubMed ID: 1471216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Epigenetic events during the process of cell transformation induced by carcinogens (review).
Nguyen-Ba G; Vasseur P
Oncol Rep; 1999; 6(4):925-32. PubMed ID: 10373683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mechanisms of non-genotoxic carcinogens and importance of a weight of evidence approach.
Hernández LG; van Steeg H; Luijten M; van Benthem J
Mutat Res; 2009; 682(2-3):94-109. PubMed ID: 19631282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Interaction and distinction of genotoxic and non-genotoxic events in carcinogenesis.
Yamasaki H; Mesnil M; Nakazawa H
Toxicol Lett; 1992 Dec; 64-65 Spec No():597-604. PubMed ID: 1471213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mechanisms of non-genotoxic carcinogenesis.
Shaw IC; Jones HB
Trends Pharmacol Sci; 1994 Mar; 15(3):89-93. PubMed ID: 8184492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The influence of chemical structure on the extent and sites of carcinogenesis for 522 rodent carcinogens and 55 different human carcinogen exposures.
Ashby J; Paton D
Mutat Res; 1993 Mar; 286(1):3-74. PubMed ID: 7678908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [The relation between carcinogenesis and mutagenesis: a re-evaluation].
Bartsch H; Malaveille C
Bull Acad Natl Med; 1989 Nov; 173(8):1005-12; discussion 1013-5. PubMed ID: 2633853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Guidelines for the evaluation of chemicals for carcinogenicity. Committee on Carcinogenicity of Chemicals in Food, Consumer Products and the Environment.
Rep Health Soc Subj (Lond); 1991; 42():1-80. PubMed ID: 1763238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mouse-specific carcinogens: an assessment of hazard and significance for validation of short-term carcinogenicity bioassays in transgenic mice.
Battershill JM; Fielder RJ
Hum Exp Toxicol; 1998 Apr; 17(4):193-205. PubMed ID: 9617631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of hepatocarcinogen-induced gene expression profiles in conventional primary rat hepatocytes with in vivo rat liver.
Doktorova TY; Ellinger-Ziegelbauer H; Vinken M; Vanhaecke T; van Delft J; Kleinjans J; Ahr HJ; Rogiers V
Arch Toxicol; 2012 Sep; 86(9):1399-411. PubMed ID: 22484513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Qualitative and quantitative approaches in the dose-response assessment of genotoxic carcinogens.
Fukushima S; Gi M; Kakehashi A; Wanibuchi H; Matsumoto M
Mutagenesis; 2016 May; 31(3):341-6. PubMed ID: 26152227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Non-genotoxic carcinogenesis: implications for testing and extrapolation to man.
Roe FJ
Mutagenesis; 1989 Nov; 4(6):407-11. PubMed ID: 2695753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Neonatal mouse model: review of methods and results.
McClain RM; Keller D; Casciano D; Fu P; MacDonald J; Popp J; Sagartz J
Toxicol Pathol; 2001; 29 Suppl():128-37. PubMed ID: 11695548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An integrative test strategy for cancer hazard identification.
Luijten M; Olthof ED; Hakkert BC; Rorije E; van der Laan JW; Woutersen RA; van Benthem J
Crit Rev Toxicol; 2016 Aug; 46(7):615-39. PubMed ID: 27142259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pollution, carcinogenesis and cancer prevention.
Ramel C
Acta Oncol; 1991; 30(6 Spec No):27-33. PubMed ID: 1910870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Epigenetic alterations induced by genotoxic occupational and environmental human chemical carcinogens: A systematic literature review.
Chappell G; Pogribny IP; Guyton KZ; Rusyn I
Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res; 2016; 768():27-45. PubMed ID: 27234561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Detection of genotoxic and non-genotoxic carcinogens in Xpc(-/-)p53(+/-) mice.
Melis JP; Speksnijder EN; Kuiper RV; Salvatori DC; Schaap MM; Maas S; Robinson J; Verhoef A; van Benthem J; Luijten M; van Steeg H
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2013 Jan; 266(2):289-97. PubMed ID: 23153559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Constitutive and carcinogen-derived DNA binding as a basis for the assessment of potency of chemical carcinogens.
Lutz WK
Adv Exp Med Biol; 1981; 136 Pt B():1349-65. PubMed ID: 7344514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is current risk assessment of non-genotoxic carcinogens protective?
Braakhuis HM; Slob W; Olthof ED; Wolterink G; Zwart EP; Gremmer ER; Rorije E; van Benthem J; Woutersen R; van der Laan JW; Luijten M
Crit Rev Toxicol; 2018 Jul; 48(6):500-511. PubMed ID: 29745287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Are genotoxic carcinogens more potent than nongenotoxic carcinogens?
Parodi S; Malacarne D; Romano P; Taningher M
Environ Health Perspect; 1991 Nov; 95():199-204. PubMed ID: 1821372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
