These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14712415)

  • 1. [Investigation of the entrance dose of standardized chest radiographs].
    Stieve FE; Gfirtner H; Jung EM; Schenk G
    Rofo; 2004 Jan; 176(1):113-21. PubMed ID: 14712415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Radiation exposure of children in pediatric radiology. Part 4: Entrance doses achieved during the X-ray examination of the chest].
    Seidenbusch MC; Schneider K
    Rofo; 2008 Dec; 180(12):1082-103. PubMed ID: 19009497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. 2007 recommendations of the ICRP change basis for estimation of the effective dose: what is the impact on radiation dose assessment of patient and personnel?
    Boetticher Hv; Lachmund J; Looe HK; Hoffmann W; Poppe B
    Rofo; 2008 May; 180(5):391-5. PubMed ID: 18438741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Local diagnostic reference levels for adult posteroanterior (PA) chest x-ray examination in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
    Teferi S; Admassie D; Worku A; Zewdeneh D
    Ethiop Med J; 2010 Jan; 48(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 20607998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. AMBER chest radiography and patient dose measurements.
    Persliden J; Fransson SG
    Acta Radiol; 1995 Nov; 36(6):641-3. PubMed ID: 8519576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [CR (Computed Radiography)].
    Matsumoto M
    Igaku Butsuri; 2002; 22(2):110-7. PubMed ID: 12766288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Monte Carlo based method to estimate radiation dose from multidetector CT (MDCT): cylindrical and anthropomorphic phantoms.
    DeMarco JJ; Cagnon CH; Cody DD; Stevens DM; McCollough CH; O'Daniel J; McNitt-Gray MF
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Sep; 50(17):3989-4004. PubMed ID: 16177525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Radiation dose in digital chest radiography: comparison among three technologies.
    Saiani F; Ghirardi C; Rodella CA; Feroldi P; Chiesa A
    Radiol Med; 2004 Apr; 107(4):401-7. PubMed ID: 15103291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. First results on patient dose measurements from conventional diagnostic radiology procedures in Serbia and Montenegro.
    Ciraj O; Marković S; Kosutić D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 113(3):330-5. PubMed ID: 15755772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Radiation doses and risks from internal emitters.
    Harrison J; Day P
    J Radiol Prot; 2008 Jun; 28(2):137-59. PubMed ID: 18495991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Study on evaluation method of patient dose in diagnostic radiology required for introducing the guidance level: investigation of entrance surface dose of patient using direct measurement by TLD].
    Iwanami S; Ishiguchi T; Ishigaki T; Koga S; Niibe H; Aburano T; Irifune T; Kaneko M; Kusakabe K; Kusama T; Sasaki T; Sasaki Y; Shibuya H; Takayama M; Nakamura H; Nohara N; Hiramatsu Y; Fujioka M; Machida K; Ookouchi Y
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 2000 Jun; 60(7):396-405. PubMed ID: 10921299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Consideration of the ICRP 2006 revised tissue weighting factors on age-dependent values of the effective dose for external photons.
    Lee C; Lee C; Han EY; Bolch WE
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jan; 52(1):41-58. PubMed ID: 17183127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Retrospective patient dose analysis of a digital radiography system in routine clinical use.
    Schuncke A; Neitzel U
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):131-4. PubMed ID: 15933094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of four methods for assessing patient effective dose from radiological examinations.
    Theocharopoulos N; Perisinakis K; Damilakis J; Varveris H; Gourtsoyiannis N
    Med Phys; 2002 Sep; 29(9):2070-9. PubMed ID: 12349928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. New ICRP recommendations.
    Wrixon AD
    J Radiol Prot; 2008 Jun; 28(2):161-8. PubMed ID: 18495983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison between effective doses for voxel-based and stylized exposure models from photon and electron irradiation.
    Kramer R; Khoury HJ; Vieira JW
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Nov; 50(21):5105-26. PubMed ID: 16237244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Estimation of the peak entrance surface air kerma for patients undergoing computed tomography-guided procedures.
    Avilés Lucas P; Dance DR; Castellano IA; Vañó E
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):317-20. PubMed ID: 15933129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Radiation exposure of children in pediatric radiology part 8: radiation doses during thoracoabdominal babygram and abdominal X-ray examination of the newborn and young infants].
    Schneider K; Seidenbusch MC
    Rofo; 2010 Jun; 182(6):479-92. PubMed ID: 20084594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Monitoring of the medical radiological exposures of the population of the Emilia-Romagna Region.
    Compagnone G; Angelini P; Pagan L
    Radiol Med; 2006 Apr; 111(3):469-80. PubMed ID: 16683092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Method of patient dose evaluation in the angiographic and interventional radiology procedures.
    Rivolta A; Emanuelli S; Tessarin C; Bresciani S; Genovese MG; Rogge D; Scielzo G
    Radiol Med; 2005; 110(5-6):689-98. PubMed ID: 16437054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.