298 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1471244)
1. Frequency of delayed hemolytic transfusion reactions following antibody screening and immediate-spin crossmatching.
Pinkerton PH; Coovadia AS; Goldstein J
Transfusion; 1992; 32(9):814-7. PubMed ID: 1471244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Experience with the routine use of an abbreviated crossmatch.
Shulman IA; Nelson JM; Saxena S; Thompson JC; Okamoto M; Kent DR; Nakayama RK
Am J Clin Pathol; 1984 Aug; 82(2):178-81. PubMed ID: 6465079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The risk of an overt hemolytic transfusion reaction following the use of an immediate spin crossmatch.
Shulman IA
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1990 Apr; 114(4):412-4. PubMed ID: 2322101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A prospective study to determine the safety of omitting the antiglobulin crossmatch from pretransfusion testing.
Heddle NM; O'Hoski P; Singer J; McBride JA; Ali MA; Kelton JG
Br J Haematol; 1992 Aug; 81(4):579-84. PubMed ID: 1390245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A hemolytic reaction implicating Sda antibody missed by immediate spin crossmatch.
Reznicek MJ; Cordle DG; Strauss RG
Vox Sang; 1992; 62(3):173-5. PubMed ID: 1609519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Revisiting the issue: can the reading for serologic reactivity following 37 degrees C incubation be omitted?
Judd WJ; Fullen DR; Steiner EA; Davenport RD; Knafl PC
Transfusion; 1999 Mar; 39(3):295-9. PubMed ID: 10204593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Anti-i causing acute hemolysis following a negative immediate-spin crossmatch.
Judd WJ; Steiner EA; Abruzzo LV; Davenport RD; Oberman HA; Pehta JC; Nance SJ
Transfusion; 1992; 32(6):572-5. PubMed ID: 1502712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Acute extravascular hemolytic transfusion reaction due to anti-Kpa antibody missed by electronic crossmatch.
Padmore R; Berardi P; Erickson K; Desjardins D; Giulivi A; Tokessy M; Neurath D; Saidenberg E
Transfus Apher Sci; 2014 Oct; 51(2):168-71. PubMed ID: 25175412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Indirect antiglobulin test-crossmatch using low-ionic-strength saline-albumin enhancement medium and reduced incubation time: effectiveness in the detection of most clinically significant antibodies and impact on blood utilization.
Dinardo CL; Bonifácio SL; Mendrone A
Immunohematology; 2014; 30(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 25238242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Monocyte Monolayer Assay: Past, Present and Future.
Tong TN; Cen S; Branch DR
Transfus Med Rev; 2019 Jan; 33(1):24-28. PubMed ID: 30139679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Evaluation of the polyethyleneglycol antiglobulin test in the detection and identification of erythrocyte antibodies].
Jiménez Marco MT; Hernández Maraver D; Rodríguez de la Rua A; de la Cámara Mendizábal C; Canales Albendea M; Jiménez Yuste V; Hernández Navarro F
Sangre (Barc); 1998 Feb; 43(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 9577178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Do patients with autoantibodies or clinically insignificant alloantibodies require an indirect antiglobulin test crossmatch?
Lee E; Redman M; Burgess G; Win N
Transfusion; 2007 Jul; 47(7):1290-5. PubMed ID: 17581166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Hemolytic transfusion reaction due to Rh antibodies detectable only by manual polybrene and polyethylene glycol technique.
Lin CK; Wong KF; Mak KH; Yuen CM; Lee AW
Am J Clin Pathol; 1995 Dec; 104(6):660-2. PubMed ID: 8526209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Red blood cell transfusion in patients with anti-Yt
Wong SM; Cawthorne T; Dennington PM; Hong FS
Transfusion; 2021 Feb; 61(2):379-384. PubMed ID: 33410173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Incompatible crossmatch following nonreactive antibody detection test. Frequency and cause.
Mintz PD; Haines AL; Sullivan MF
Transfusion; 1982; 22(2):107-10. PubMed ID: 7071913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Increased detection of clinically significant antibodies and decreased incidence of delayed haemolytic transfusion reaction with the indirect antiglobulin test potentiated by polyethylene glycol compared to albumin: a Japanese study.
Okutsu M; Ohto H; Yasuda H; Kawabata K; Ono S; Saito S; Sugawara A; Kikuchi M; Miura S; Ishii Y; Watanabe K; Tohyama Y; Nollet KE
Blood Transfus; 2011 Jul; 9(3):311-9. PubMed ID: 21251459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Two-stage papain-indirect antiglobulin test and LISS direct agglutination are not appropriate for pretransfusion screening for unexpected antibodies.
Pereira A; Mazzara R; Gelabert A; Castillo R
Haematologica; 1991; 76(6):475-8. PubMed ID: 1820984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. HEMOLYTIC TRANSFUSION REACTIONS.
STUCKEY MA; OSOBA D; THOMAS JW
Can Med Assoc J; 1964 Mar; 90(12):739-41. PubMed ID: 14130497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Can the reading for serologic reactivity following 37 degrees C incubation be omitted?
Judd WJ; Steiner EA; Oberman HA; Nance SJ
Transfusion; 1992 May; 32(4):304-8. PubMed ID: 1585433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Delayed hemolytic transfusion reactions. Evidence of the need for an improved pretransfusion compatibility test.
Moore SB; Taswell HF; Pineda AA; Sonnenberg CL
Am J Clin Pathol; 1980 Jul; 74(1):94-7. PubMed ID: 7395821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
