BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14713792)

  • 1. Feasibility of radical prostatectomy after neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy for patients with high risk or locally advanced prostate cancer: results of a phase I/II study.
    Konety BR; Eastham JA; Reuter VE; Scardino PT; Donat SM; Dalbagni G; Russo P; Herr HW; Schwartz L; Kantoff PW; Scher H; Kelly WK
    J Urol; 2004 Feb; 171(2 Pt 1):709-13. PubMed ID: 14713792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Phase II trial of neoadjuvant estramustine and etoposide plus radical prostatectomy for locally advanced prostate cancer.
    Clark PE; Peereboom DM; Dreicer R; Levin HS; Clark SB; Klein EA
    Urology; 2001 Feb; 57(2):281-5. PubMed ID: 11182337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Long-term follow-up of a neoadjuvant chemohormonal taxane-based phase II trial before radical prostatectomy in patients with non-metastatic high-risk prostate cancer.
    Prayer-Galetti T; Sacco E; Pagano F; Gardiman M; Cisternino A; Betto G; Sperandio P
    BJU Int; 2007 Aug; 100(2):274-80. PubMed ID: 17355369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and hormonal therapy followed by radical prostatectomy: feasibility and preliminary results.
    Pettaway CA; Pisters LL; Troncoso P; Slaton J; Finn L; Kamoi K; Logothetis CJ
    J Clin Oncol; 2000 Mar; 18(5):1050-7. PubMed ID: 10694556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Correlation of clinical and pathologic factors with rising prostate-specific antigen profiles after radical prostatectomy alone for clinically localized prostate cancer.
    Kupelian P; Katcher J; Levin H; Zippe C; Klein E
    Urology; 1996 Aug; 48(2):249-60. PubMed ID: 8753737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) 90203: a randomized phase 3 study of radical prostatectomy alone versus estramustine and docetaxel before radical prostatectomy for patients with high-risk localized disease.
    Eastham JA; Kelly WK; Grossfeld GD; Small EJ;
    Urology; 2003 Dec; 62 Suppl 1():55-62. PubMed ID: 14747042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
    Ploussard G; Agamy MA; Alenda O; Allory Y; Mouracade P; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L
    BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Phase II trial of neoadjuvant nab-paclitaxel in high risk patients with prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy.
    Shepard DR; Dreicer R; Garcia J; Elson P; Magi-Galluzzi C; Raghavan D; Stephenson AJ; Klein EA
    J Urol; 2009 Apr; 181(4):1672-7; discussion 1677. PubMed ID: 19230915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy in poor-prognosis localized prostate cancer.
    Sella A; Zisman A; Kovel S; Yarom N; Leibovici D; Lindner A
    Urology; 2008 Feb; 71(2):323-7. PubMed ID: 18308112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Outcome predictors of radical prostatectomy followed by adjuvant androgen deprivation in patients with clinical high risk prostate cancer and pT3 surgical margin positive disease.
    Spahn M; Briganti A; Capitanio U; Kneitz B; Gontero P; Karnes JR; Schubert M; Montorsi F; Scholz CJ; Bader P; van Poppel H; Joniau S;
    J Urol; 2012 Jul; 188(1):84-90. PubMed ID: 22578727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. External beam radiotherapy versus radical prostatectomy for clinical stage T1-2 prostate cancer: therapeutic implications of stratification by pretreatment PSA levels and biopsy Gleason scores.
    Kupelian P; Katcher J; Levin H; Zippe C; Suh J; Macklis R; Klein E
    Cancer J Sci Am; 1997; 3(2):78-87. PubMed ID: 9099457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The limited significance of a longer duration of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy prior to radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer in Japanese men.
    Miyake H; Sakai I; Inoue TA; Hara I; Fujisawa M
    Urol Int; 2006; 77(2):122-6. PubMed ID: 16888415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Phase II trial of neoadjuvant docetaxel and gefitinib followed by radical prostatectomy in patients with high-risk, locally advanced prostate cancer.
    Vuky J; Porter C; Isacson C; Vaughan M; Kozlowski P; Picozzi V; Corman J
    Cancer; 2009 Feb; 115(4):784-91. PubMed ID: 19130458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Role of early adjuvant hormonal therapy after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
    Zincke H; Lau W; Bergstralh E; Blute ML
    J Urol; 2001 Dec; 166(6):2208-15. PubMed ID: 11696737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Update on Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center studies of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy for prostate cancer.
    Fair WR; Betancourt JE
    Mol Urol; 2000; 4(3):241-8;discussion 249-50. PubMed ID: 11062380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Identification of factors predicting response to adjuvant radiation therapy in patients with positive margins after radical prostatectomy.
    Kamat AM; Babaian K; Cheung MR; Naya Y; Huang SH; Kuban D; Babaian RJ
    J Urol; 2003 Nov; 170(5):1860-3. PubMed ID: 14532793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Long-term survival of patients with locally advanced prostate cancer managed with neoadjuvant docetaxel and radical prostatectomy.
    Zhao B; Yerram NK; Gao T; Dreicer R; Klein EA
    Urol Oncol; 2015 Apr; 33(4):164.e19-23. PubMed ID: 25665510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Risk factors of positive surgical margin and biochemical recurrence of patients treated with radical prostatectomy: a single-center 10-year report.
    Li K; Li H; Yang Y; Ian LH; Pun WH; Ho SF
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2011 Apr; 124(7):1001-5. PubMed ID: 21542957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cytoreductive radical prostatectomy in patients with prostate cancer and low volume skeletal metastases: results of a feasibility and case-control study.
    Heidenreich A; Pfister D; Porres D
    J Urol; 2015 Mar; 193(3):832-8. PubMed ID: 25254935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Radical prostatectomy for pathological Gleason 8 or greater prostate cancer: influence of concomitant pathological variables.
    Lau WK; Bergstralh EJ; Blute ML; Slezak JM; Zincke H
    J Urol; 2002 Jan; 167(1):117-22. PubMed ID: 11743287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.