BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

71 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1471399)

  • 1. Validation of aortic valve pressure gradient quantification using semi-automated 4D flow CMR pipeline.
    Grafton-Clarke C; Njoku P; Aben JP; Ledoux L; Zhong L; Westenberg J; Swift A; Archer G; Wild J; Hose R; Flather M; Vassiliou VS; Garg P
    BMC Res Notes; 2022 Apr; 15(1):151. PubMed ID: 35488286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Discrepancies between direct catheter and echocardiography-based values in aortic stenosis.
    Yang CS; Marshall ES; Fanari Z; Kostal MJ; West JT; Kolm P; Weintraub WS; Doorey AJ
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Feb; 87(3):488-97. PubMed ID: 26033475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fully Automated Artificial Intelligence Assessment of Aortic Stenosis by Echocardiography.
    Krishna H; Desai K; Slostad B; Bhayani S; Arnold JH; Ouwerkerk W; Hummel Y; Lam CSP; Ezekowitz J; Frost M; Jiang Z; Equilbec C; Twing A; Pellikka PA; Frazin L; Kansal M
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2023 Jul; 36(7):769-777. PubMed ID: 36958708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quantification of functional hemodynamics in aortic valve disease using cardiac computed tomography angiography.
    Liu X; Guo G; Wang A; Wang Y; Chen S; Zhao P; Yin Z; Liu S; Gao Z; Zhang H; Zu L
    Comput Biol Med; 2024 Jul; 177():108608. PubMed ID: 38796880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of aortic stenosis: From Bernoulli and Doppler to Navier-Stokes.
    Gill H; Fernandes J; Chehab O; Prendergast B; Redwood S; Chiribiri A; Nordsletten D; Rajani R; Lamata P
    Trends Cardiovasc Med; 2023 Jan; 33(1):32-43. PubMed ID: 34920129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How can progression be predicted in patients with mild to moderate aortic valve stenosis?
    Seo JH; Kim KH; Chun KJ; Lee BK; Cho BR; Ryu DR
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2023 Aug; 24(9):1146-1153. PubMed ID: 37159331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Non-invasive myocardial work in aortic stenosis: validation and improvement in left ventricular pressure estimation.
    Ribic D; Remme EW; Smiseth OA; Massey RJ; Eek CH; Kvitting JP; Gullestad L; Broch K; Russell K
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2024 Jan; 25(2):201-212. PubMed ID: 37672652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Transformer-Based Spatio-Temporal Analysis for Classification of Aortic Stenosis Severity From Echocardiography Cine Series.
    Ahmadi N; Tsang MY; Gu AN; Tsang TSM; Abolmaesumi P
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2024 Jan; 43(1):366-376. PubMed ID: 37581960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical, Experimental, and Computational Validation of a New Doppler-Based Index for Coarctation Severity Assessment.
    Ghorbannia A; Ellepola CD; Woods RK; Ibrahim EH; Maadooliat M; Ramirez HM; LaDisa JF
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2022 Dec; 35(12):1311-1321. PubMed ID: 36122791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Correlation between pressure gradient from echocardiography and peak-to-peak pressure gradient from cardiac catheterization or surgery in patients with coarctation of aorta.
    Apithanung L; Sethasathien S; Silvilairat S; Sittiwangkul R; Makonkawkeyoon K; Saengsin K; Woragidpoonpol S
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2024 Jun; 40(6):1193-1200. PubMed ID: 38558331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Practical value of echo Doppler evaluation of aortic and mitral stenosis: a comparative study with cardiac catheterization.
    Bitar J; Douthat L; Alam M; Rosman HS; Lebeis M; Goldstein S; Khaja F
    Henry Ford Hosp Med J; 1990; 38(1):87-90. PubMed ID: 2228721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Aortic valve stenosis: to the gradient and beyond--the mismatch between area and gradient severity.
    Abbas AE; Franey LM; Goldstein J; Lester S
    J Interv Cardiol; 2013 Apr; 26(2):183-94. PubMed ID: 23278313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. What do you mean by aortic valve area: geometric orifice area, effective orifice area, or gorlin area?
    Garcia D; Kadem L
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2006 Sep; 15(5):601-8. PubMed ID: 17044363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Noninvasive quantification and classification of the severity of aortic stenosis using Doppler echocardiography].
    Schmalz A; Erbel R; Wittlich N; Mohr-Kahaly S; Meyer J
    Z Kardiol; 1992 Nov; 81(11):619-26. PubMed ID: 1471399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Aortic valve area discrepancy by Gorlin equation and Doppler echocardiography continuity equation: relationship to flow in patients with valvular aortic stenosis.
    Burwash IG; Dickinson A; Teskey RJ; Tam JW; Chan KL
    Can J Cardiol; 2000 Aug; 16(8):985-92. PubMed ID: 10978934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of aortic stenosis severity: role of contrast echocardiography in comparison with conventional echocardiography and cardiac catheterization.
    Almeida AG; Sargento L; Gabriel HM; da Costa JM; Morais J; Madeira F; David C; Oliveira J; da Cunha JC; Vagueiro MC
    Rev Port Cardiol; 2002 May; 21(5):555-72. PubMed ID: 12174519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.