These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14714715)

  • 1. Caesarean for breech: a paradigm shift?
    Kaushik V; Gudgeon C
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2003 Aug; 43(4):298-301; discussion 261. PubMed ID: 14714715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of the international term breech trial on clinical practice and concerns: a survey of centre collaborators.
    Hogle KL; Kilburn L; Hewson S; Gafni A; Wall R; Hannah ME
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2003 Jan; 25(1):14-6. PubMed ID: 12548320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Breech delivery and scarred uterus: a special obstetrical situation?].
    Bourtembourg A; Mangin M; Ramanah R; Maillet R; Riethmuller D
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2013 Jun; 42(4):351-8. PubMed ID: 23453918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Wide differences in mode of delivery within Europe: risk-stratified analyses of aggregated routine data from the Euro-Peristat study.
    Macfarlane AJ; Blondel B; Mohangoo AD; Cuttini M; Nijhuis J; Novak Z; Ólafsdóttir HS; Zeitlin J;
    BJOG; 2016 Mar; 123(4):559-68. PubMed ID: 25753683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Elective caesarean section for breech presentation in first pregnancy and subsequent mode of labour.
    Khaskheli MN; Baloch S; Sheeba A
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2014 May; 24(5):323-6. PubMed ID: 24848389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Retrospective analysis of 663 breech deliveries during the years 1976 to 1985].
    Lellé RJ; Goeschen K; Wichmann D; Schneider J
    Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol; 1989; 193(6):268-75. PubMed ID: 2609709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contribution of changing risk factors to the trend in breech presentation at term.
    Bin YS; Roberts CL; Nicholl MC; Nassar N; Ford JB
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2016 Dec; 56(6):564-570. PubMed ID: 27748525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Outcomes of breech birth by mode of delivery: a population linkage study.
    Bin YS; Roberts CL; Ford JB; Nicholl MC
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2016 Oct; 56(5):453-459. PubMed ID: 27339863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [The outcome of delivery in the breech presentation at the Stara Zagora Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinic during 1990-1992].
    Lazarov L; Todorov I
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 1995; 34(2):4-7. PubMed ID: 8651423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Changes in the rates of caesarean delivery before labour for breech presentation at term in France: 1972-2003.
    Carayol M; Blondel B; Zeitlin J; Breart G; Goffinet F
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2007 May; 132(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 16797822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [External cephalic version for breech presentation at term: an effective procedure to reduce the caesarean section rate].
    Lojacono A; Donarini G; Valcamonico A; Soregaroli M; Frusca T
    Minerva Ginecol; 2003 Dec; 55(6):519-24. PubMed ID: 14676741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Fewer breech deliveries after implementation of a modified cephalic version protocol].
    Kuppens SM; Francois AM; Hasaart TH; van der Donk MW; Pop VJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2010; 154():A63. PubMed ID: 20132565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. External cephalic version for breech presentation at term: predictors of success, and impact on the rate of caesarean section.
    Hussin OA; Mahmoud MA; Abdel-Fattah MM
    East Mediterr Health J; 2013 Feb; 19(2):162-6. PubMed ID: 23516827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How useful are national caesarean section rates for monitoring quality of perinatal care?
    Mathai M
    BJOG; 2016 Mar; 123(4):569. PubMed ID: 25752779
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of a protocol for selecting fetuses in breech presentation for vaginal delivery or cesarean section.
    Albrechtsen S; Rasmussen S; Reigstad H; Markestad T; Irgens LM; Dalaker K
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Sep; 177(3):586-92. PubMed ID: 9322628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Term breech presentation in The Netherlands from 1995 to 1999: mortality and morbidity in relation to the mode of delivery of 33824 infants.
    Rietberg CC; Elferink-Stinkens PM; Brand R; van Loon AJ; Van Hemel OJ; Visser GH
    BJOG; 2003 Jun; 110(6):604-9. PubMed ID: 12798480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Uptake of external cephalic version for term breech presentation: an Australian population study, 2002-2012.
    Bin YS; Roberts CL; Nicholl MC; Ford JB
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Jul; 17(1):244. PubMed ID: 28747173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The implementation of external cephalic version at term for singleton breech presentation--how can we further increase its impact?
    Lau TK; Lo KW; Wan D; Rogers MS
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1997 Nov; 37(4):393-6. PubMed ID: 9429699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Results of mostly vaginal deliveries of breech presentation].
    Hofmann D; Carle-Grewe G
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1990; 112(24):1525-40. PubMed ID: 2072979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Neonatal outcome after a planned vaginal breech birth: no association with parity or birth weight, but more birth injuries than in planned cesarean section].
    Brouwer WK; Veenstra van Nieuwenhoven AL; Santema JG
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2001 Aug; 145(32):1554-7. PubMed ID: 11525090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.