These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14714783)

  • 1. Bridging automatic speech recognition and psycholinguistics: extending Shortlist to an end-to-end model of human speech recognition.
    Scharenborg O; ten Bosch L; Boves L; Norris D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Dec; 114(6 Pt 1):3032-5. PubMed ID: 14714783
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intonation and dialog context as constraints for speech recognition.
    Taylor P; King S; Isard S; Wright H
    Lang Speech; 1998; 41 ( Pt 3-4)():493-512. PubMed ID: 10746367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Lombard reflex and its role on human listeners and automatic speech recognizers.
    Junqua JC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Jan; 93(1):510-24. PubMed ID: 8423266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Speech perception: from signal to word.
    Miller JL; Eimas PD
    Annu Rev Psychol; 1995; 46():467-92. PubMed ID: 7872735
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Variation in the speech signal as a window into the cognitive architecture of language production.
    Bürki A
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Dec; 25(6):1973-2004. PubMed ID: 29383571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Linguistic adaptations during spoken and multimodal error resolution.
    Oviatt S; Bernard J; Levow GA
    Lang Speech; 1998; 41 ( Pt 3-4)():419-42. PubMed ID: 10746365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rapid adaptation to foreign-accented English.
    Clarke CM; Garrett MF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Dec; 116(6):3647-58. PubMed ID: 15658715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of automatic and human speech recognition in null grammar.
    Juneja A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Mar; 131(3):EL256-61. PubMed ID: 22423817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Frequency distributions of uniphones, diphones, and triphones in spontaneous speech.
    Kuperman V; Ernestus M; Baayen H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Dec; 124(6):3897-908. PubMed ID: 19206815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Words in puddles of sound: modelling psycholinguistic effects in speech segmentation.
    Monaghan P; Christiansen MH
    J Child Lang; 2010 Jun; 37(3):545-64. PubMed ID: 20307344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Processing of illegal consonant clusters: a case of perceptual assimilation?
    Hallé PA; Segui J; Frauenfelder U; Meunier C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1998 Apr; 24(2):592-608. PubMed ID: 9554098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Issues in the study of intonation in language varieties.
    Warren P
    Lang Speech; 2005; 48(Pt 4):345-58. PubMed ID: 16715681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Feature, phoneme, syllable or word: how is speech mentally represented?
    Sendlmeier WF
    Phonetica; 1995; 52(3):131-43. PubMed ID: 7568391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Processing coordination ambiguity.
    Engelhardt PE; Ferreira F
    Lang Speech; 2010; 53(Pt 4):494-509. PubMed ID: 21313991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prosodic boundary information modulates phonetic categorization.
    Kim S; Cho T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jul; 134(1):EL19-25. PubMed ID: 23862901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Asymmetric processing of lexical tonal contrast in Swedish.
    Felder V; Jönsson-Steiner E; Eulitz C; Lahiri A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Nov; 71(8):1890-9. PubMed ID: 19933571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Short-term exposure to one dialect affects processing of another.
    Hay J; Drager K; Warren P
    Lang Speech; 2010; 53(Pt 4):447-71. PubMed ID: 21313989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optical phonetics and visual perception of lexical and phrasal stress in English.
    Scarborough R; Keating P; Mattys SL; Cho T; Alwan A
    Lang Speech; 2009; 52(Pt 2-3):135-75. PubMed ID: 19624028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Frequency and form as determinants of functor sensitivity in English-acquiring infants.
    Shi R; Cutler A; Werker J; Cruickshank M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Jun; 119(6):EL61-7. PubMed ID: 16838552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The impact of attention load on the use of statistical information and coarticulation as speech segmentation cues.
    Fernandes T; Kolinsky R; Ventura P
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1522-32. PubMed ID: 20675798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.