These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14714798)
1. Equivalence of Gaussian and piston ultrasonic transducer voltages. Lobkis OI; Chimenti DE J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Dec; 114(6 Pt 1):3155-66. PubMed ID: 14714798 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Spectral integral formulae for the response of acoustic transducers in cylindrically curved configurations. Zerong S IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 1998; 45(3):768-78. PubMed ID: 18244228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Focused, phased-array plane piston and spherically-shaped concave piston transducers: comparison for the same aperture and focal point. Warriner RK; Cobbold RS Ultrasonics; 2012 Apr; 52(4):503-7. PubMed ID: 22133736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ultrasonic field modeling by distributed point source method for different transducer boundary conditions. Yanagita T; Kundu T; Placko D J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Nov; 126(5):2331-9. PubMed ID: 19894816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Acousto-optic effect compensation for optical determination of the normal velocity distribution associated with acoustic transducer radiation. Foote KG; Theobald PD J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Sep; 138(3):1627-36. PubMed ID: 26428801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Discriminating between the nearfield and the farfield of acoustic transducers. Foote KG J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Oct; 136(4):1511-7. PubMed ID: 25324055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Progress in developing a thermal method for measuring the output power of medical ultrasound transducers that exploits the pyroelectric effect. Zeqiri B; Zauhar G; Hodnett M; Barrie J Ultrasonics; 2011 May; 51(4):420-4. PubMed ID: 21163509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Flow induced by acoustic streaming on surface-acoustic-wave devices and its application in biofouling removal: a computational study and comparisons to experiment. Sankaranarayanan SK; Cular S; Bhethanabotla VR; Joseph B Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2008 Jun; 77(6 Pt 2):066308. PubMed ID: 18643372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Some extensions of the Gaussian beam expansion: radiation fields of the rectangular and the elliptical transducer. Ding D; Zhang Y; Liu J J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Jun; 113(6):3043-8. PubMed ID: 12822775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Acoustic field prediction for a single planar continuous-wave source using an equivalent phased array method. Fan X; Moros EG; Straube WL J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Nov; 102(5 Pt 1):2734-41. PubMed ID: 9373969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Experimental validation of two elastodynamic models for the wave field generated by ultrasonic transducers. Bakker MC; Verweij MD J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Apr; 113(4 Pt 1):1850-62. PubMed ID: 12703697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Acoustical tweezers using single spherically focused piston, X-cut, and Gaussian beams. Mitri FG IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2015 Oct; 62(10):1835-44. PubMed ID: 26470046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Acoustic field modeling for physiotherapy ultrasound applicators by using approximated functions of measured non-uniform radiation distributions. Gutiérrez MI; Calás H; Ramos A; Vera A; Leija L Ultrasonics; 2012 Aug; 52(6):767-77. PubMed ID: 22405588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Measurement of Rayleigh Wave Beams Using Angle Beam Wedge Transducers as the Transmitter and Receiver with Consideration of Beam Spreading. Zhang S; Li X; Jeong H Sensors (Basel); 2017 Jun; 17(6):. PubMed ID: 28632183 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ultrasonic field modeling: a comparison of analytical, semi-analytical, and numerical techniques. Kundu T; Placko D; Rahani EK; Yanagita T; Dao CM IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2010 Dec; 57(12):2795-807. PubMed ID: 21156375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Rapid transient pressure field computations in the nearfield of circular transducers using frequency-domain time-space decomposition. Alles EJ; Zhu Y; van Dongen KW; McGough RJ Ultrason Imaging; 2012 Oct; 34(4):237-60. PubMed ID: 23160476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Determination of acoustic impedances of multi matching layers for narrowband ultrasonic airborne transducers at frequencies <2.5 MHz - Application of a genetic algorithm. Saffar S; Abdullah A Ultrasonics; 2012 Jan; 52(1):169-85. PubMed ID: 21893329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Experimental study of underwater transmission characteristics of high-frequency 30 MHz polyurea ultrasonic transducer. Nakazawa M; Aoyagi T; Tabaru M; Nakamura K; Ueha S Ultrasonics; 2014 Feb; 54(2):526-36. PubMed ID: 24035608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An evaluation of effective radiuses of bulk-wave ultrasonic transducers as circular piston sources for accurate velocity measurements. Arakawa M; Kushibiki J; Aoki N IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2004 May; 51(5):496-501. PubMed ID: 15217227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]