200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1471493)
1. Association of reliability with reproducibility of the glaucomatous visual field.
McMillan TA; Stewart WC; Hunt HH
Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1992 Oct; 70(5):665-70. PubMed ID: 1471493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A prospective three-year study of response properties of normal subjects and patients during automated perimetry.
Johnson CA; Nelson-Quigg JM
Ophthalmology; 1993 Feb; 100(2):269-74. PubMed ID: 8437837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Is visual field evaluation using multiple correlations and linear regressions useful? An evaluation of Delphi perimetry.
Wishart PK; Wardrop DR; Kosmin AS
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1998 Jul; 236(7):493-500. PubMed ID: 9672794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Baseline visual field characteristics in the ocular hypertension treatment study.
Johnson CA; Keltner JL; Cello KE; Edwards M; Kass MA; Gordon MO; Budenz DL; Gaasterland DE; Werner E;
Ophthalmology; 2002 Mar; 109(3):432-7. PubMed ID: 11874743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Detection of glaucomatous visual field defect using a screening program of Humphrey Field Analyzer.
Hong C; Song KY; Youn DH; Park WH
Korean J Ophthalmol; 1990 Jun; 4(1):23-5. PubMed ID: 2214247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparing the Performance of Compass Perimetry With Humphrey Field Analyzer in Eyes With Glaucoma.
Rao HL; Raveendran S; James V; Dasari S; Palakurthy M; Reddy HB; Pradhan ZS; Rao DA; Puttaiah NK; Devi S
J Glaucoma; 2017 Mar; 26(3):292-297. PubMed ID: 27977480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Analysis of reliability indices from Humphrey visual field tests in an urban glaucoma population.
Birt CM; Shin DH; Samudrala V; Hughes BA; Kim C; Lee D
Ophthalmology; 1997 Jul; 104(7):1126-30. PubMed ID: 9224465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of five methods for estimating general glaucomatous visual field depression.
Funkhouser A; Flammer J; Fankhauser F; Hirsbrunner HP
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1992; 230(2):101-6. PubMed ID: 1577286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reliability of computerized perimetric threshold tests as assessed by reliability indices and threshold reproducibility in patients with suspect and manifest glaucoma.
Bengtsson B
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2000 Oct; 78(5):519-22. PubMed ID: 11037906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A multicenter comparison study of the Humphrey Field Analyzer I and the Humphrey Field Analyzer II.
Johnson CA; Cioffi GA; Drance SM; Gaasterland D; Mills RP; Ashburn F; Hnik P; Van Coevorden RE
Ophthalmology; 1997 Nov; 104(11):1910-7. PubMed ID: 9373125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Short-wavelength automated perimetry in low-, medium-, and high-risk ocular hypertensive eyes. Initial baseline results.
Johnson CA; Brandt JD; Khong AM; Adams AJ
Arch Ophthalmol; 1995 Jan; 113(1):70-6. PubMed ID: 7826296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study. 2. Visual field test scoring and reliability.
Ophthalmology; 1994 Aug; 101(8):1445-55. PubMed ID: 7741836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Static versus kinetic testing in the nasal peripheral field in patients with glaucoma.
Stewart WC
Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1992 Feb; 70(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 1557979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Response properties of normal observers and patients during automated perimetry.
Nelson-Quigg JM; Twelker JD; Johnson CA
Arch Ophthalmol; 1989 Nov; 107(11):1612-5. PubMed ID: 2818281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Glaucomatous damage patterns by short-wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP) in glaucoma suspects.
Polo V; Larrosa JM; Pinilla I; Gonzalvo F; Ferreras A; Honrubia FM
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2002; 12(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 11936444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Temporal visual field in glaucoma: a re-evaluation in the automated perimetry era.
Pennebaker GE; Stewart WC
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1992; 230(2):111-4. PubMed ID: 1577288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Blue-on-yellow perimetry can predict the development of glaucomatous visual field loss.
Johnson CA; Adams AJ; Casson EJ; Brandt JD
Arch Ophthalmol; 1993 May; 111(5):645-50. PubMed ID: 8489447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluating the accuracy of the visual field index for the Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer in patients with mild to moderate glaucoma.
Talbot R; Goldberg I; Kelly P
Am J Ophthalmol; 2013 Dec; 156(6):1272-6. PubMed ID: 24075425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Performance of frequency-doubling technology perimetry in a population-based prevalence survey of glaucoma: the Tajimi study.
Iwase A; Tomidokoro A; Araie M; Shirato S; Shimizu H; Kitazawa Y;
Ophthalmology; 2007 Jan; 114(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 17070580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Confirmation of visual field abnormalities in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study. Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study Group.
Keltner JL; Johnson CA; Quigg JM; Cello KE; Kass MA; Gordon MO
Arch Ophthalmol; 2000 Sep; 118(9):1187-94. PubMed ID: 10980763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
