BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14716128)

  • 1. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance: is it worthwhile to qualify them further?
    Sodhani P; Gupta S; Sehgal A; Singh V; Khan IU; Mitra AB
    Indian J Cancer; 2003; 40(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 14716128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Significance of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance on ThinPrep papanicolaou smears.
    Eltabbakh GH; Lipman JN; Mount SL; Morgan A
    Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Oct; 79(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 11006029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Diagnosis and survey of abnormal/atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions: a retrospective study.
    Giudice A; Rizzo M; Rossi RT; Bonaffini O; Buda CA; Pettineo G
    Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(2B):1195-9. PubMed ID: 10810421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance in liquid-based cytologic specimens: results of reflex human papillomavirus testing and histologic follow-up in routine practice with comparison of interpretive and probabilistic reporting methods.
    Levi AW; Kelly DP; Rosenthal DL; Ronnett BM
    Cancer; 2003 Aug; 99(4):191-7. PubMed ID: 12925979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Qualifiers of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance help in patient management.
    Collins LC; Wang HH; Abu-Jawdeh GM
    Mod Pathol; 1996 Jun; 9(6):677-81. PubMed ID: 8782207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. ASCUS and AGUS criteria. International Academy of Cytology Task Force summary. Diagnostic Cytology Towards the 21st Century: An International Expert Conference and Tutorial.
    Solomon D; Frable WJ; Vooijs GP; Wilbur DC; Amma NS; Collins RJ; Davey DD; Knight BK; Luff RD; Meisels A; Navin J; Rosenthal DL; Sauer T; Stoler M; Suprun HZ; Yamauchi K
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 9479320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Virologic versus cytologic triage of women with equivocal Pap smears: a meta-analysis of the accuracy to detect high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia.
    Arbyn M; Buntinx F; Van Ranst M; Paraskevaidis E; Martin-Hirsch P; Dillner J
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Feb; 96(4):280-93. PubMed ID: 14970277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cost and effectiveness comparison of immediate colposcopy versus human papillomavirus DNA testing in management of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance in Turkish women.
    Kececioglu M; Seckin B; Baser E; Togrul C; Kececioglu TS; Cicek MN; Gungor T
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2013; 14(1):511-4. PubMed ID: 23534785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. AGUS and ASCUS: different incidence in pre- and postmenopausal women.
    Balbi GC; Cardone A; Zarcone R; Visconti S; Del Piano L
    Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2004; 25(5):603-5. PubMed ID: 15493176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Colposcopic and histologic findings in women with a cytologic diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.
    Yarandi F; Izadi Mood N; Mirashrafi F; Eftekhar Z
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2004 Dec; 44(6):514-6. PubMed ID: 15598287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. ASCUS on cervical cytologic smears. Clinical significance.
    Yang M; Zachariah S
    J Reprod Med; 1997 Jun; 42(6):329-31. PubMed ID: 9219118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical impact of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. A cytohistologic comparison.
    Lousuebsakul V; Knutsen SM; Gram IT; Akin MR
    Acta Cytol; 2000; 44(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 10667155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Atypical epithelial cells and specimen adequacy: current laboratory practices of participants in the college of American pathologists interlaboratory comparison program in cervicovaginal cytology.
    Davey DD; Woodhouse S; Styer P; Stastny J; Mody D
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2000 Feb; 124(2):203-11. PubMed ID: 10656727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. ASCUS: comparative follow-up results related to previous SIL diagnosis.
    Alameda F; Fuste P; Conangla M; Gimferrer E; Soler I; Antorn MT; Persico S; Carreras R; Serrano S
    Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2000; 21(1):81-3. PubMed ID: 10726627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Histology correlation with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) cytology diagnoses: An argument to ensure ASCUS follow-up that is as aggressive as that for LSIL.
    Dvorak KA; Finnemore M; Maksem JA
    Diagn Cytopathol; 1999 Oct; 21(4):292-5. PubMed ID: 10495326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Human papillomavirus testing as triage for atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions: sensitivity, specificity, and cost-effectiveness.
    Kaufman RH; Adam E; Icenogle J; Reeves WC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Oct; 177(4):930-6. PubMed ID: 9369847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reducing or eliminating use of the category of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance decreases the diagnostic accuracy of the Papanicolaou smear.
    Pitman MB; Cibas ES; Powers CN; Renshaw AA; Frable WJ
    Cancer; 2002 Jun; 96(3):128-34. PubMed ID: 12115299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quality metrics in cervical cytopathology: A single institutional study.
    Senthil Kumar D; Ravikumar G
    Cytopathology; 2022 Mar; 33(2):230-235. PubMed ID: 34854153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Should the cytologic diagnosis of "atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance" be qualified? An assessment including comparison between conventional and liquid-based technologies.
    Anton RC; Ramzy I; Schwartz MR; Younes P; Chakraborty S; Mody DR
    Cancer; 2001 Apr; 93(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 11309773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is p16(INK4A) expression more useful than human papillomavirus test to determine the outcome of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance-categorized Pap smear? A comparative analysis using abnormal cervical smears with follow-up biopsies.
    Nieh S; Chen SF; Chu TY; Lai HC; Lin YS; Fu E; Gau CH
    Gynecol Oncol; 2005 Apr; 97(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 15790434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.