These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14717827)

  • 21. Cue competition affects temporal dynamics of edge-assignment in human visual cortex.
    Brooks JL; Palmer SE
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Mar; 23(3):631-44. PubMed ID: 20146596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Multiple cues add up in defining a figure on a ground.
    Devinck F; Spillmann L
    Vision Res; 2013 Jan; 77():51-8. PubMed ID: 23201562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Exogenous attention differentially modulates the processing of categorical and coordinate spatial relations.
    Okubo M; Laeng B; Saneyoshi A; Michimata C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Sep; 135(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 20441992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The role of spatial organization in preference for color pairs.
    Schloss KB; Palmer SE
    Perception; 2011; 40(9):1063-80. PubMed ID: 22208128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Interactions between voluntary and stimulus-driven spatial attention mechanisms across sensory modalities.
    Santangelo V; Olivetti Belardinelli M; Spence C; Macaluso E
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Dec; 21(12):2384-97. PubMed ID: 19199406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Figure-Ground Processing: A Reassessment of Gelb and Granit.
    Nelson R; Hebda N
    Perception; 2018 Mar; 47(3):344-354. PubMed ID: 29285993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A new cue to figure-ground coding: top-bottom polarity.
    Hulleman J; Humphreys GW
    Vision Res; 2004 Nov; 44(24):2779-91. PubMed ID: 15342222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The modulation of spatial congruency by object-based attention: analysing the "locus" of the modulation.
    Luo C; Lupiáñez J; Funes MJ; Fu X
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Dec; 64(12):2455-69. PubMed ID: 21923623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Occipital-parietal interactions during shifts of exogenous visuospatial attention: trial-dependent changes of effective connectivity.
    Indovina I; Macaluso E
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Dec; 22(10):1477-86. PubMed ID: 15707797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The cat's response to stimulus difference as attention focus and cue.
    Robinson JS; Murray DM; Voneida TJ
    Perception; 1978; 7(4):437-47. PubMed ID: 704274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effects of visual cue and response assignment on spatial stimulus coding in stimulus-response compatibility.
    Nishimura A; Yokosawa K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(1):55-72. PubMed ID: 21939367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Investigating the time course of tactile reflexive attention using a non-spatial discrimination task.
    Miles E; Poliakoff E; Brown RJ
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jun; 128(2):210-5. PubMed ID: 18262498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Figure-ground segmentation can occur without attention.
    Kimchi R; Peterson MA
    Psychol Sci; 2008 Jul; 19(7):660-8. PubMed ID: 18727781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The time course of figure-ground reversal.
    Hulleman J; Gedamke L; Humphreys GW
    Percept Psychophys; 2005 May; 67(4):595-605. PubMed ID: 16134454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Interactions between exogenous auditory and visual spatial attention.
    Schmitt M; Postma A; De Haan E
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 Feb; 53(1):105-30. PubMed ID: 10718066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Interaction between endogenous and exogenous orienting in crossmodal attention.
    Chen X; Chen Q; Gao D; Yue Z
    Scand J Psychol; 2012 Aug; 53(4):303-8. PubMed ID: 22670628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Figure-ground effects on shape memory for objects versus holes.
    Palmer S; Davis J; Nelson R; Rock I
    Perception; 2008; 37(10):1569-86. PubMed ID: 19065859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Learning in shifts of transient attention improves recognition of parts of ambiguous figure-ground displays.
    Kristjánsson A
    J Vis; 2009 Apr; 9(4):21.1-11. PubMed ID: 19757930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Figure and ground in the visual cortex: v2 combines stereoscopic cues with gestalt rules.
    Qiu FT; von der Heydt R
    Neuron; 2005 Jul; 47(1):155-66. PubMed ID: 15996555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Learned value and predictiveness affect gaze but not figure assignment.
    Onie S; Peterson MA; Le Pelley M; Most SB
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Jan; 83(1):156-172. PubMed ID: 33145714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.