422 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14718419)
1. Effect of three wound dressings on infection, healing comfort, and cost in patients with sternotomy wounds: a randomized trial.
Wynne R; Botti M; Stedman H; Holsworth L; Harinos M; Flavell O; Manterfield C
Chest; 2004 Jan; 125(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 14718419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of three wound dressings in patients undergoing heart surgery.
Wikblad K; Anderson B
Nurs Res; 1995; 44(5):312-6. PubMed ID: 7567488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Occlusive vs gauze dressings for local wound care in surgical patients: a randomized clinical trial.
Ubbink DT; Vermeulen H; Goossens A; Kelner RB; Schreuder SM; Lubbers MJ
Arch Surg; 2008 Oct; 143(10):950-5. PubMed ID: 18936373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparative study of three occlusive dressings in the treatment of full-thickness wounds in pigs.
Agren MS; Mertz PM; Franzén L
J Am Acad Dermatol; 1997 Jan; 36(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 8996261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Costs of dressings in the community.
Bale S; Hagelstein S; Banks V; Harding KG
J Wound Care; 1998 Jul; 7(7):327-30. PubMed ID: 9791356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A prospective, randomized, multisite clinical evaluation of a transparent absorbent acrylic dressing and a hydrocolloid dressing in the management of Stage II and shallow Stage III pressure ulcers.
Brown-Etris M; Milne C; Orsted H; Gates JL; Netsch D; Punchello M; Couture N; Albert M; Attrell E; Freyberg J
Adv Skin Wound Care; 2008 Apr; 21(4):169-74. PubMed ID: 18385577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A new hydrocolloid dressing prevents surgical site infection of median sternotomy wounds.
Teshima H; Kawano H; Kashikie H; Nakamura K; Imada T; Oda T; Aoyagi S
Surg Today; 2009; 39(10):848-54. PubMed ID: 19784722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A prospective trial comparing Biobrane, Duoderm and xeroform for skin graft donor sites.
Feldman DL; Rogers A; Karpinski RH
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1991 Jul; 173(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 1907769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of three new hydrocolloid dressings: retention of dressing integrity and biodegradability of absorbent components attenuate inflammation.
Chakravarthy D; Rodway N; Schmidt S; Smith D; Evancho M; Sims R
J Biomed Mater Res; 1994 Oct; 28(10):1165-73. PubMed ID: 7530252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quality improvement evaluation of postoperative wound dressings in orthopaedic patients.
Pickles S; McAllister E; McCullagh G; Nieroba TJ
Int J Orthop Trauma Nurs; 2022 May; 45():100922. PubMed ID: 35227950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A prospective, randomized controlled trial comparing 3 dressing types following sternotomy.
Dickinson Jennings C; Culver Clark R; Baker JW
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2015 May; 61(5):42-9. PubMed ID: 25965091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prospective evaluation of occlusive hydrocolloid dressing versus conventional gauze dressing regarding the healing effect after abdominal operations: randomized controlled trial.
Shinohara T; Yamashita Y; Satoh K; Mikami K; Yamauchi Y; Hoshino S; Noritomi A; Maekawa T
Asian J Surg; 2008 Jan; 31(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 18334461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Comparison of Three Dressing Methods for Pilonidal Sinus Surgery Wound Healing.
Sadati L; Froozesh R; Beyrami A; Khaneghah ZN; Elahi SA; Asl MF; Salehi T
Adv Skin Wound Care; 2019 Jul; 32(7):1-5. PubMed ID: 31232840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparing DuoDERM E with scarlet red in the treatment of split skin graft donor sites.
Tan ST; Roberts RH; Blake GB
Br J Plast Surg; 1993 Jan; 46(1):79-81. PubMed ID: 8431748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Role of Surgical Dressings in Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Springer BD; Beaver WB; Griffin WL; Mason JB; Odum SM
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2015 Sep; 44(9):415-20. PubMed ID: 26372751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical benefit of a hydrocolloid dressing in closed surgical wounds.
Hermans MH
J ET Nurs; 1993; 20(2):68-72. PubMed ID: 8507729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pressure ulcers--randomised controlled trial comparing hydrocolloid and saline gauze dressings.
Chang KW; Alsagoff S; Ong KT; Sim PH
Med J Malaysia; 1998 Dec; 53(4):428-31. PubMed ID: 10971989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A cost-effectiveness study of leg ulcer treatment in primary care. Comparison of saline-gauze and hydrocolloid treatment in a prospective, randomized study.
Ohlsson P; Larsson K; Lindholm C; Möller M
Scand J Prim Health Care; 1994 Dec; 12(4):295-9. PubMed ID: 7863149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Management of superficial to partial-thickness wounds.
Beam JW
J Athl Train; 2007; 42(3):422-4. PubMed ID: 18059999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Modelling the cost implications of using carboxymethylcellulose dressing compared with gauze in the management of surgical wounds healing by secondary intention in the US and UK.
Guest JF; Ruiz FJ
Curr Med Res Opin; 2005 Feb; 21(2):281-90. PubMed ID: 15801999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
