These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14718881)

  • 1. Bond strength of various bracket base designs.
    Wang WN; Li CH; Chou TH; Wang DD; Lin LH; Lin CT
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Jan; 125(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 14718881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of orthodontic bracket base design on shear bond strength.
    Sharma-Sayal SK; Rossouw PE; Kulkarni GV; Titley KC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Jul; 124(1):74-82. PubMed ID: 12867901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of bond strength between simple foil mesh and laser-structured base retention brackets.
    Sorel O; El Alam R; Chagneau F; Cathelineau G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Sep; 122(3):260-6. PubMed ID: 12226606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of the debonding characteristics of two innovative ceramic bracket designs.
    Bishara SE; Olsen ME; VonWald L; Jakobsen JR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Jul; 116(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 10393585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative evaluation of ceramic bracket base designs.
    Bordeaux JM; Moore RN; Bagby MD
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Jun; 105(6):552-60. PubMed ID: 8198079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bond strength: a comparison between chemical coated and mechanical interlock bases of ceramic and metal brackets.
    Wang WN; Meng CL; Tarng TH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Apr; 111(4):374-81. PubMed ID: 9109582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of Bond Strength of Brackets with Foil Mesh and Laser Structure Base using Light Cure Composite Resin: An in vitro Study.
    Rajesh RN; Girish KS; Sanjay N; Scindhia RD; Kumar SG; Rajesh S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2015 Dec; 16(12):963-70. PubMed ID: 27018031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of variation in mesh-base design on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets.
    Bishara SE; Soliman MM; Oonsombat C; Laffoon JF; Ajlouni R
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Jun; 74(3):400-4. PubMed ID: 15264654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the shear bond strength of different ceramic bracket base designs.
    Olsen ME; Bishara SE; Jakobsen JR
    Angle Orthod; 1997; 67(3):179-82. PubMed ID: 9188961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bond strength and debonding characteristics of a new ceramic bracket.
    Liu JK; Chung CH; Chang CY; Shieh DB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Dec; 128(6):761-5; quiz 802. PubMed ID: 16360918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An in vitro evaluation of a metal reinforced orthodontic ceramic bracket.
    Mundstock KS; Sadowsky PL; Lacefield W; Bae S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Dec; 116(6):635-41. PubMed ID: 10587597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of different debonding techniques on the debonding forces and failure modes of ceramic brackets in simulated clinical set-ups.
    Chen HY; Su MZ; Chang HF; Chen YJ; Lan WH; Lin CP
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Nov; 132(5):680-6. PubMed ID: 18005844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of bracket base design on the strength of the bracket-cement interface.
    Knox J; Hubsch P; Jones ML; Middleton J
    J Orthod; 2000 Sep; 27(3):249-54. PubMed ID: 11099557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quantitative analysis of mechanically retentive ceramic bracket base surfaces with a three-dimensional imaging system.
    Kang DY; Choi SH; Cha JY; Hwang CJ
    Angle Orthod; 2013 Jul; 83(4):705-11. PubMed ID: 23270384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of the debonding characteristics of 2 ceramic brackets: an in vitro study.
    Theodorakopoulou LP; Sadowsky PL; Jacobson A; Lacefield W
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Mar; 125(3):329-36. PubMed ID: 15014410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of orthodontic bracket base diameter and mesh size on bond strength.
    Cucu M; Driessen CH; Ferreira PD
    SADJ; 2002 Jan; 57(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 11901581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of debonding characteristics of a new collapsible ceramic bracket.
    Bishara SE; Olsen ME; Von Wald L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Nov; 112(5):552-9. PubMed ID: 9387843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The relationship between bond strength and orthodontic bracket base surface area with conventional and microetched foil-mesh bases.
    MacColl GA; Rossouw PE; Titley KC; Yamin C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Mar; 113(3):276-81. PubMed ID: 9517718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of repeated bonding on the shear bond strength of different orthodontic adhesives.
    Bishara SE; Laffoon JF; Vonwald L; Warren JJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 May; 121(5):521-5. PubMed ID: 12045771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of self-etchant pH on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets.
    Ostby AW; Bishara SE; Denehy GE; Laffoon JF; Warren JJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Aug; 134(2):203-8. PubMed ID: 18675201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.