469 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14719754)
1. Clinical evaluation of packable and conventional hybrid resin-based composites for posterior restorations in permanent teeth: results at 12 months.
Yip KH; Poon BK; Chu FC; Poon EC; Kong FY; Smales RJ
J Am Dent Assoc; 2003 Dec; 134(12):1581-9. PubMed ID: 14719754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical evaluation of packable and conventional hybrid posterior resin-based composites: results at 3.5 years.
Poon EC; Smales RJ; Yip KH
J Am Dent Assoc; 2005 Nov; 136(11):1533-40. PubMed ID: 16329416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Two-year clinical evaluation of a packable resin-based composite.
Türkün LS; Türkün M; Ozata F
J Am Dent Assoc; 2003 Sep; 134(9):1205-12. PubMed ID: 14528992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical evaluation of two packable posterior composites: a five-year follow-up.
Fagundes TC; Barata TJ; Carvalho CA; Franco EB; van Dijken JW; Navarro MF
J Am Dent Assoc; 2009 Apr; 140(4):447-54. PubMed ID: 19339534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Two-year clinical evaluation of packable and nanostructured resin-based composites placed with two techniques.
Monteiro PM; Manso MC; Gavinha S; Melo P
J Am Dent Assoc; 2010 Mar; 141(3):319-29. PubMed ID: 20194388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Eighteen-month clinical evaluation of microhybrid, packable and nanofilled resin composites in Class I restorations.
Sadeghi M; Lynch CD; Shahamat N
J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Jul; 37(7):532-7. PubMed ID: 20202097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A clinical evaluation of packable and microhybrid resin composite restorations: one-year report.
de Souza FB; Guimarães RP; Silva CH
Quintessence Int; 2005 Jan; 36(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 15709496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of packable and conventional hybrid resin composites in Class I restorations: three-year results of a randomized, double-blind and controlled clinical trial.
Shi L; Wang X; Zhao Q; Zhang Y; Zhang L; Ren Y; Chen Z
Oper Dent; 2010; 35(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 20166406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical evaluation of polyacid-modified resin composite posterior restorations: one-year results.
Luo Y; Lo EC; Fang DT; Wei SH
Quintessence Int; 2000 Oct; 31(9):630-6. PubMed ID: 11203987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. 3-Year clinical evaluation of posterior packable composite resin restorations.
Loguercio AD; Reis A; Hernandez PA; Macedo RP; Busato AL
J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Feb; 33(2):144-51. PubMed ID: 16457675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical performance of Class II adhesive restorations in pulpectomized primary molars: 12-month results.
Zulfikaroglu BT; Atac AS; Cehreli ZC
J Dent Child (Chic); 2008; 75(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 18505646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical Performance and Epidemiologic Aspects of Fractured Anterior Teeth Restored with a Composite Resin: A Two-Year Clinical Study.
Vural UK; Kiremitçi A; Gökalp S
J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan; 28(1):e204-e209. PubMed ID: 28960769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical performance of a packable resin composite for a period of 3 years.
Türkün LS; Türkün M; Ozata F
Quintessence Int; 2005 May; 36(5):365-72. PubMed ID: 15892534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Six-year clinical evaluation of packable composite restorations.
Kiremitci A; Alpaslan T; Gurgan S
Oper Dent; 2009; 34(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 19192832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of the mechanical and physical properties of a posterior resin composite in posterior adult teeth.
Agbaje LO; Shaba OP; Adegbulugbe IC
Niger J Clin Pract; 2010 Dec; 13(4):431-5. PubMed ID: 21220860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. One-year clinical evaluation of SureFil packable composite.
Perry R; Kugel G; Leinfelder K
Compend Contin Educ Dent; 1999 Jun; 20(6):544-50, 552-3. PubMed ID: 10650367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Twenty-four-month clinical evaluation of different posterior composite resin materials.
Türkün LS; Aktener BO
J Am Dent Assoc; 2001 Feb; 132(2):196-203; quiz 224-5. PubMed ID: 11217593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of pattern of failure of resin composite restorations in non-carious cervical lesions with and without occlusal wear facets.
Oginni AO; Adeleke AA
J Dent; 2014 Jul; 42(7):824-30. PubMed ID: 24746714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical evaluation of a nanohybrid and a flowable resin composite in non-carious cervical lesions: 24-month results.
Karaman E; Yazici AR; Ozgunaltay G; Dayangac B
J Adhes Dent; 2012 Aug; 14(5):485-92. PubMed ID: 22724113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical performance of a packable resin composite for posterior teeth after 3 years.
Ernst CP; Martin M; Stuff S; Willershausen B
Clin Oral Investig; 2001 Sep; 5(3):148-55. PubMed ID: 11642558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
