473 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14719754)
21. Clinical evaluation of Dyract AP restorative in permanent molars: 2-year results.
Luo Y; Lo EC; Fang DT; Smales RJ; Wei SH
Am J Dent; 2002 Dec; 15(6):403-6. PubMed ID: 12691278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Clinical evaluation of two packable resin-based composite restorations: a three-year report.
Torres CR; Borges AB; Goncalves SE; Pucci CR; de Araujo MA; Barcellos DC
Gen Dent; 2010; 58(4):338-43. PubMed ID: 20591781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Three-year clinical evaluation of different restorative resins in class I restorations.
Yazici AR; Ustunkol I; Ozgunaltay G; Dayangac B
Oper Dent; 2014; 39(3):248-55. PubMed ID: 24754716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparative clinical evaluation of different treatment approaches using a microfilled resin composite and a compomer in Class III cavities: two-year results.
Demirci M; Yildiz E; Uysal O
Oper Dent; 2008; 33(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 18335727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Clinical evaluation of two packable posterior composites: 2-year follow-up.
Fagundes TC; Barata TJ; Bresciani E; Cefaly DF; Jorge MF; Navarro MF
Clin Oral Investig; 2006 Sep; 10(3):197-203. PubMed ID: 16823554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The physical properties of packable and conventional posterior resin-based composites: a comparison.
Cobb DS; MacGregor KM; Vargas MA; Denehy GE
J Am Dent Assoc; 2000 Nov; 131(11):1610-5. PubMed ID: 11103581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Clinical evaluation of two one-bottle dentin adhesives at three years.
Swift EJ; Perdigão J; Wilder AD; Heymann HO; Sturdevant JR; Bayne SC
J Am Dent Assoc; 2001 Aug; 132(8):1117-23. PubMed ID: 11575019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A 3-year clinical evaluation of a compomer, a composite and a compomer/composite (sandwich) in class II restorations.
Wucher M; Grobler SR; Senekal PJ
Am J Dent; 2002 Aug; 15(4):274-8. PubMed ID: 12572648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Retention and marginal adaptation of a compomer placed in non-stress-bearing areas used with the total-etch technique: a 3-year retrospective study.
Prati C; Chersoni S; Cretti L; Montanari G
Clin Oral Investig; 1998 Dec; 2(4):168-73. PubMed ID: 10388389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Direct resin composite restorations versus indirect composite inlays: one-year results.
Mendonça JS; Neto RG; Santiago SL; Lauris JR; Navarro MF; de Carvalho RM
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 May; 11(3):025-32. PubMed ID: 20461321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Two-year clinical performance of a packable posterior composite with and without a flowable composite liner.
Ernst CP; Canbek K; Aksogan K; Willershausen B
Clin Oral Investig; 2003 Sep; 7(3):129-34. PubMed ID: 12898294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Clinical evaluation of a nanofilled composite in posterior teeth: 12-month results.
Dresch W; Volpato S; Gomes JC; Ribeiro NR; Reis A; Loguercio AD
Oper Dent; 2006; 31(4):409-17. PubMed ID: 16924980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. One-year clinical evaluation of posterior packable resin composite restorations.
Loguercio AD; Reis A; Rodrigues Filho LE; Busato AL
Oper Dent; 2001; 26(5):427-34. PubMed ID: 11551005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Total-etch versus self-etch adhesive: effect on postoperative sensitivity.
Perdigão J; Geraldeli S; Hodges JS
J Am Dent Assoc; 2003 Dec; 134(12):1621-9. PubMed ID: 14719760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A randomized controlled 27 years follow up of three resin composites in Class II restorations.
Pallesen U; van Dijken JW
J Dent; 2015 Dec; 43(12):1547-58. PubMed ID: 26363442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Performance of 2 packable composites at 12 months.
Browning WD; Myers ML; Chan DC; Downey MC; Pohjola RM; Frazier KB
Quintessence Int; 2006 May; 37(5):361-8. PubMed ID: 16683683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Clinical evaluation of a hybrid composite and a polyacid-modified composite resin in Class-II restorations in deciduous molars.
Attin T; Opatowski A; Meyer C; Zingg-Meyer B; Hellwig E
Clin Oral Investig; 1998 Sep; 2(3):115-9. PubMed ID: 9927911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Marginal Gap Formation in Approximal "Bulk Fill" Resin Composite Restorations After Artificial Ageing.
Peutzfeldt A; Mühlebach S; Lussi A; Flury S
Oper Dent; 2018; 43(2):180-189. PubMed ID: 29148914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A clinical evaluation of a self-etching primer and a giomer restorative material: results at eight years.
Gordan VV; Mondragon E; Watson RE; Garvan C; Mjör IA
J Am Dent Assoc; 2007 May; 138(5):621-7. PubMed ID: 17473040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A clinical evaluation of a giomer restorative system containing surface prereacted glass ionomer filler: results from a 13-year recall examination.
Gordan VV; Blaser PK; Watson RE; Mjör IA; McEdward DL; Sensi LG; Riley JL
J Am Dent Assoc; 2014 Oct; 145(10):1036-43. PubMed ID: 25270702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
