BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14720125)

  • 1. Proposal of Polish guidelines for conducting financial analysis and their comparison to existing guidance on budget impact in other countries.
    Orlewska E; Mierzejewski P
    Value Health; 2004; 7(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 14720125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Budget impact analysis-principles of good practice: report of the ISPOR 2012 Budget Impact Analysis Good Practice II Task Force.
    Sullivan SD; Mauskopf JA; Augustovski F; Jaime Caro J; Lee KM; Minchin M; Orlewska E; Penna P; Rodriguez Barrios JM; Shau WY
    Value Health; 2014; 17(1):5-14. PubMed ID: 24438712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Principles of good practice for budget impact analysis: report of the ISPOR Task Force on good research practices--budget impact analysis.
    Mauskopf JA; Sullivan SD; Annemans L; Caro J; Mullins CD; Nuijten M; Orlewska E; Watkins J; Trueman P
    Value Health; 2007; 10(5):336-47. PubMed ID: 17888098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Guidelines for conducting pharmaceutical budget impact analyses for submission to public drug plans in Canada.
    Marshall DA; Douglas PR; Drummond MF; Torrance GW; Macleod S; Manti O; Cheruvu L; Corvari R
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2008; 26(6):477-95. PubMed ID: 18489199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Budget impact analysis.
    Leelahavarong P
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2014 May; 97 Suppl 5():S65-71. PubMed ID: 24964701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The French National Authority for Health (HAS) Guidelines for Conducting Budget Impact Analyses (BIA).
    Ghabri S; Autin E; PoulliƩ AI; Josselin JM
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2018 Apr; 36(4):407-417. PubMed ID: 29247437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [HAS budget impact analysis guidelines: A new decision-making tool].
    Ghabri S; PoulliƩ AI; Autin E; Josselin JM
    Sante Publique; 2017 Oct; 29(4):585-588. PubMed ID: 29034674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Cost-effectiveness of new drugs impacts reimbursement decision making but room for improvement].
    Hoomans T; van der Roer N; Severens JL; Delwel GO
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2010; 154():A958. PubMed ID: 20699045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Role of budget impact in drug reimbursement decisions.
    Cohen JP; Stolk E; Niezen M
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 2008 Apr; 33(2):225-47. PubMed ID: 18325899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Health technology assessment in Poland and Scotland: comparison of process and decisions.
    Kolasa K; Wasiak R
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2012 Jan; 28(1):70-6. PubMed ID: 22617739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Finding legitimacy for the role of budget impact in drug reimbursement decisions.
    Niezen MG; de Bont A; Busschbach JJ; Cohen JP; Stolk EA
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Jan; 25(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 19126251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cost-effectiveness analysis in relation to budgetary constraints and reallocative restrictions.
    Adang E; Voordijk L; Jan van der Wilt G; Ament A
    Health Policy; 2005 Oct; 74(2):146-56. PubMed ID: 16153475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Budget Impact Analysis of Diabetes Drugs: A Systematic Literature Review.
    Luo Z; Ruan Z; Yao D; Ung COL; Lai Y; Hu H
    Front Public Health; 2021; 9():765999. PubMed ID: 34869180
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Belgian guidelines for budget impact analyses.
    Neyt M; Cleemput I; Sande SV; Thiry N;
    Acta Clin Belg; 2015 Jun; 70(3):175-80. PubMed ID: 25579611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Drug reimbursement decision-making in Thailand, China, and South Korea.
    Ngorsuraches S; Meng W; Kim BY; Kulsomboon V
    Value Health; 2012; 15(1 Suppl):S120-5. PubMed ID: 22265058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS)--explanation and elaboration: a report of the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluation Publication Guidelines Good Reporting Practices Task Force.
    Husereau D; Drummond M; Petrou S; Carswell C; Moher D; Greenberg D; Augustovski F; Briggs AH; Mauskopf J; Loder E;
    Value Health; 2013; 16(2):231-50. PubMed ID: 23538175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Do health-care decision makers find economic evaluations useful? The findings of focus group research in UK health authorities.
    Hoffmann C; Stoykova BA; Nixon J; Glanville JM; Misso K; Drummond MF
    Value Health; 2002; 5(2):71-8. PubMed ID: 11918822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Estimating Downstream Budget Impacts in Implementation Research.
    Wagner TH; Dopp AR; Gold HT
    Med Decis Making; 2020 Nov; 40(8):968-977. PubMed ID: 32951506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A methodological review of national and transnational pharmaceutical budget impact analysis guidelines for new drug submissions.
    Foroutan N; Tarride JE; Xie F; Levine M
    Clinicoecon Outcomes Res; 2018; 10():821-854. PubMed ID: 30538513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Pharmaco-economic evaluations of new drugs: potential key to a more efficient allocation of the health care budget].
    Delwel GO; Sprenger MJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2002 Jun; 146(23):1068-71. PubMed ID: 12085554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.