These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14722988)

  • 1. In search of a gold standard.
    Larson TD
    Northwest Dent; 2003; 82(6):13-8. PubMed ID: 14722988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars.
    Dejak B; Mlotkowski A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Conservative indirect restorations for posterior teeth. Cast versus bonded ceramic.
    Donovan TE; Chee WW
    Dent Clin North Am; 1993 Jul; 37(3):433-43. PubMed ID: 8348996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The status of indirect restorative dental materials.
    Brown D
    Dent Update; 1998; 25(1):23-8, 30-2, 34. PubMed ID: 9709598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of cement selection and finishing technique on marginal opening of cast gold inlays.
    Farrell CV; Johnson GH; Oswald MT; Tucker RD
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):287-92. PubMed ID: 18395539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stress distributions in adhesively cemented ceramic and resin-composite Class II inlay restorations: a 3D-FEA study.
    Ausiello P; Rengo S; Davidson CL; Watts DC
    Dent Mater; 2004 Nov; 20(9):862-72. PubMed ID: 15451242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bonding indirect resin composites to metal: part 2. Effect of alloy surface treatment on elemental composition of alloy and bond strength.
    Petridis H; Garefis P; Hirayama H; Kafantaris NM; Koidis PT
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 15008237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bonding of adhesive resin luting agents to metal and amalgam.
    Osman SA; McCabe JF; Walls AW
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2008 Dec; 16(4):171-6. PubMed ID: 19177728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with indirect-composite and ceramic inlay systems.
    Soares CJ; Martins LR; Pfeifer JM; Giannini M
    Quintessence Int; 2004 Apr; 35(4):281-6. PubMed ID: 15119713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In vitro evaluation of push-out bond strength of direct ceramic inlays to tooth surface with fiber-reinforced composite at the interface.
    Cekic I; Ergun G; Uctasli S; Lassila LV
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 May; 97(5):271-8. PubMed ID: 17547945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Ceramic inlays and onlays].
    van Pelt AW; de Kloet HJ; van der Kuy P
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1996 Nov; 103(11):472-6. PubMed ID: 11921995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Gold-porcelain alloys].
    Charon LF
    Bull Group Int Rech Sci Stomatol; 1971 Jan; 14(1):5-14. PubMed ID: 5282716
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of restoration method on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars.
    Yamada Y; Tsubota Y; Fukushima S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(1):94-8. PubMed ID: 15008239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with CAD/CAM ceramic inlays.
    Hannig C; Westphal C; Becker K; Attin T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):342-9. PubMed ID: 16198171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative strength of metal-ceramic and metal-composite bonds after extended thermocycling.
    Shimoe S; Tanoue N; Yanagida H; Atsuta M; Koizumi H; Matsumura H
    J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Jul; 31(7):689-94. PubMed ID: 15210031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of mouth-motion fatigue and thermal cycling on the marginal accuracy of partial coverage restorations made of various dental materials.
    Stappert CF; Chitmongkolsuk S; Silva NR; Att W; Strub JR
    Dent Mater; 2008 Sep; 24(9):1248-57. PubMed ID: 18395785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vitro two-body wear of inlay-onlay composite resin restoratives.
    Burgoyne AR; Nicholls JI; Brudvik JS
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Feb; 65(2):206-14. PubMed ID: 2051355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Wear evaluation of porcelain opposing gold, composite resin, and enamel.
    Kadokawa A; Suzuki S; Tanaka T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Oct; 96(4):258-65. PubMed ID: 17052470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bonding orthodontic brackets to porcelain using different adhesives/enamel conditioners: a comparative study.
    Bishara SE; Ajlouni R; Oonsombat C; Laffoon J
    World J Orthod; 2005; 6(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 15794038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fracture resistance of resin-based composite and ceramic inlays luted to sound human teeth.
    da Silva SB; Hilgert LA; Busato AL
    Am J Dent; 2004 Dec; 17(6):404-6. PubMed ID: 15724750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.