These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14723930)

  • 21. Microbiological aspects of an urban river used for unrestricted irrigation in the semi-arid region of north-east Brazil.
    Ceballos BS; Soares NE; Moraes MR; Catão RM; Konig A
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(3):51-7. PubMed ID: 12639005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Enterococci vs coliforms as a possible fecal contamination indicator: baseline data for Karachi.
    Hussain M; Rasool SA; Khan MT; Wajid A
    Pak J Pharm Sci; 2007 Apr; 20(2):107-11. PubMed ID: 17416563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Microbial source tracking in a small southern California urban watershed indicates wild animals and growth as the source of fecal bacteria.
    Jiang SC; Chu W; Olson BH; He JW; Choi S; Zhang J; Le JY; Gedalanga PB
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2007 Sep; 76(4):927-34. PubMed ID: 17589839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Occurrence of Salmonella in coastal North Sea water and their hygienic relation to indicator bacteria and sources of contamination].
    Tobias H; Heinemeyer EA
    Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed; 1994 Jun; 195(5-6):495-508. PubMed ID: 7916878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Growing season surface water loading of fecal indicator organisms within a rural watershed.
    Sinclair A; Hebb D; Jamieson R; Gordon R; Benedict K; Fuller K; Stratton GW; Madani A
    Water Res; 2009 Mar; 43(5):1199-206. PubMed ID: 19117588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Enumeration of viable E. coli in rivers and wastewaters by fluorescent in situ hybridization.
    Garcia-Armisen T; Servais P
    J Microbiol Methods; 2004 Aug; 58(2):269-79. PubMed ID: 15234525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Impacts of rainfall on the water quality of the Newport River Estuary (Eastern North Carolina, USA).
    Coulliette AD; Noble RT
    J Water Health; 2008 Dec; 6(4):473-82. PubMed ID: 18401112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The impact of rainfall on fecal coliform bacteria in Bayou Dorcheat (North Louisiana).
    Hill DD; Owens WE; Tchounwou PB
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2006 Mar; 3(1):114-7. PubMed ID: 16823083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Persistent toxic substance inputs to the river Seine basin (France) via atmospheric deposition and urban sludge application.
    Blanchard M; Teil MJ; Guigon E; Larcher-Tiphagne K; Ollivon D; Garban B; Chevreuil M
    Sci Total Environ; 2007 Apr; 375(1-3):232-43. PubMed ID: 17258292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Identifying human and livestock sources of fecal contamination in Kenya with host-specific Bacteroidales assays.
    Jenkins MW; Tiwari S; Lorente M; Gichaba CM; Wuertz S
    Water Res; 2009 Nov; 43(19):4956-66. PubMed ID: 19692107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Multiple modes of water quality impairment by fecal contamination in a rapidly developing coastal area: southwest Brunswick County, North Carolina.
    Cahoon LB; Hales JC; Carey ES; Loucaides S; Rowland KR; Toothman BR
    Environ Monit Assess; 2016 Feb; 188(2):89. PubMed ID: 26769702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Role of organic matter in microbial transport during irrigation with sewage effluent.
    Fine P; Hass A
    J Environ Qual; 2007; 36(4):1050-60. PubMed ID: 17526884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Sources and growth dynamics of fecal indicator bacteria in a coastal wetland system and potential impacts to adjacent waters.
    Evanson M; Ambrose RF
    Water Res; 2006 Feb; 40(3):475-86. PubMed ID: 16386284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Antibiotic resistant bacteria in wastewater processed by the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago system.
    Rijal GK; Zmuda JT; Gore R; Abedin Z; Granato T; Kollias L; Lanyon R
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 59(12):2297-304. PubMed ID: 19542634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Precipitation thresholds for fecal bacterial indicators in the Chesapeake Bay.
    Leight AK; Hood RR
    Water Res; 2018 Aug; 139():252-262. PubMed ID: 29655096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Faecal bacterial indicators removal in various wastewater treatment plants located in Almendares River watershed (Cuba).
    Garcia-Armisen T; Prats J; Marrero Y; Servais P
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(4):773-9. PubMed ID: 18776611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Assessing fecal coliform fate and transport in a coastal watershed using HSPF.
    Rolle K; Gitau MW; Chen G; Chauhan A
    Water Sci Technol; 2012; 66(5):1096-102. PubMed ID: 22797240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Survey of coastal inland pollution sources and their influence on seawater quality in Doam bay, Korea.
    Suh J; Shin S; Kahng HY; Ahn S; Lee YS; Jung JS
    Environ Monit Assess; 2018 Sep; 190(10):605. PubMed ID: 30251083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Quantification of host-specific Bacteroides-Prevotella 16S rRNA genetic markers for assessment of fecal pollution in freshwater.
    Okabe S; Okayama N; Savichtcheva O; Ito T
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2007 Mar; 74(4):890-901. PubMed ID: 17139508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Modeling the dry-weather tidal cycling of fecal indicator bacteria in surface waters of an intertidal wetland.
    Sanders BF; Arega F; Sutula M
    Water Res; 2005 Sep; 39(14):3394-408. PubMed ID: 16051310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.