370 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14724781)
1. [Prospective study comparing conventional and transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy for routine diagnosis].
Krakamp B; Parusel M; Saers T
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2004 Jan; 129(3):82-6. PubMed ID: 14724781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Unsedated transnasal versus transoral sedated upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a one-series prospective study on safety and patient acceptability.
Stroppa I; Grasso E; Paoluzi OA; Razzini C; Tosti C; Andrei F; Biancone L; Palmieri G; Romeo F; Pallone F
Dig Liver Dis; 2008 Sep; 40(9):767-75. PubMed ID: 18424197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Patients' perception of transnasal gastroscopy.
Luman W
Singapore Med J; 2008 Apr; 49(4):339-41. PubMed ID: 18418528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A prospective randomized comparison of unsedated ultrathin versus standard esophagogastroduodenoscopy in routine outpatient gastroenterology practice: does it work better through the nose?
Birkner B; Fritz N; Schatke W; Hasford J
Endoscopy; 2003 Aug; 35(8):647-51. PubMed ID: 12929058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A randomized prospective trial comparing unsedated esophagoscopy via transnasal and transoral routes using a 4-mm video endoscope with conventional endoscopy with sedation.
Thota PN; Zuccaro G; Vargo JJ; Conwell DL; Dumot JA; Xu M
Endoscopy; 2005 Jun; 37(6):559-65. PubMed ID: 15933930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A prospective randomized comparative study on the safety and tolerability of transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy.
Yagi J; Adachi K; Arima N; Tanaka S; Ose T; Azumi T; Sasaki H; Sato M; Kinoshita Y
Endoscopy; 2005 Dec; 37(12):1226-31. PubMed ID: 16329022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prospective randomized trial of transnasal versus peroral endoscopy using an ultrathin videoendoscope in unsedated patients.
Murata A; Akahoshi K; Sumida Y; Yamamoto H; Nakamura K; Nawata H
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2007 Apr; 22(4):482-5. PubMed ID: 17376037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A randomized trial of unsedated transnasal small-caliber esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) versus peroral small-caliber EGD versus conventional EGD.
Preiss C; Charton JP; Schumacher B; Neuhaus H
Endoscopy; 2003 Aug; 35(8):641-6. PubMed ID: 12929057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prospective evaluation of a new ultrathin one-plane bending videoendoscope for transnasal EGD: a comparative study on performance and tolerance.
Dumortier J; Josso C; Roman S; Fumex F; Lepilliez V; Prost B; Lot M; Guillaud O; Petit-Laurent F; Lapalus MG; Ponchon T
Gastrointest Endosc; 2007 Jul; 66(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 17591468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Transnasal gastroscopy compared to conventional gastroscopy: a randomized study of feasibility, safety, and tolerance.
Campo R; Montserrat A; Brullet E
Endoscopy; 1998 Jun; 30(5):448-52. PubMed ID: 9693891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prospective comparative study on the acceptability of unsedated transnasal endoscopy in younger versus older patients.
Murata A; Akahoshi K; Motomura Y; Matsui N; Kubokawa M; Kimura M; Ouchi J; Honda K; Endo S; Nakamura K; Takayanagi R
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2008 Oct; 42(9):965-8. PubMed ID: 18622302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of thin versus standard esophagogastroduodenoscopy.
Wilkins T; Brewster A; Lammers J
J Fam Pract; 2002 Jul; 51(7):625-9. PubMed ID: 12160501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A prospective controlled trial of an ultrathin versus a conventional endoscope in unsedated upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.
Mulcahy HE; Riches A; Kiely M; Farthing MJ; Fairclough PD
Endoscopy; 2001 Apr; 33(4):311-6. PubMed ID: 11315891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Endoscopic-guided versus cotton-tipped applicator methods of nasal anesthesia for transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy: a randomized, prospective, controlled study.
Hu CT
Am J Gastroenterol; 2008 May; 103(5):1114-21. PubMed ID: 18445099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of the effects on cardiopulmonary function of ultrathin transnasal versus normal diameter transoral esophagogastroduodenoscopy in Japan.
Kawai T; Miyazaki I; Yagi K; Kataoka M; Kawakami K; Yamagishi T; Sofuni A; Itoi T; Moriyasu F; Osaka Y; Takagi Y; Aoki T
Hepatogastroenterology; 2007; 54(75):770-4. PubMed ID: 17591059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Transnasal endoscopy vs. fluoroscopy for the placement of nasoenteric feeding tubes in critically ill patients.
Fang JC; Hilden K; Holubkov R; DiSario JA
Gastrointest Endosc; 2005 Nov; 62(5):661-6. PubMed ID: 16246675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparision between per-oral and ultrathin transnasal endoscopy in unsedated patients.
Al Karawi MA; Yasawy MI; Sanai FM; Mohammed Ael S
Saudi J Gastroenterol; 2001 Jan; 7(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 19861762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Feasibility and tolerance of 2-way and 4-way angulation videoscopes for unsedated patients undergoing transnasal EGD in GI cancer screening.
Tatsumi Y; Harada A; Matsumoto T; Tani T; Nishida H
Gastrointest Endosc; 2008 Jun; 67(7):1021-7. PubMed ID: 18279865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biopsy specimens obtained with small-caliber endoscopes have comparable diagnostic performances than those obtained with conventional endoscopes: a prospective study on 1335 specimens.
Walter T; Chesnay AL; Dumortier J; Mège-LeChevallier F; Hervieu V; Guillaud O; Lapalus MG; Lépilliez V; Fumex F; Ponchon T; Scoazec JY
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2010 Jan; 44(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 19661817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Transnasal gastroscopy.
Christensen M; Achiam M; Trap R; Støckel M; Rosenberg J; Schulze S
Dan Med Bull; 2000 Jun; 47(3):218-20. PubMed ID: 10913986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
