These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1472518)

  • 21. Effects of different surgical regimes on nasal asymmetry and facial attractiveness in patients with clefts of the lip and palate.
    Roberts-Harry DP; Evans R; Hathorn IS
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1991 Jul; 28(3):274-8. PubMed ID: 1911815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Reliability of Americleft Yardstick Nasolabial Appearance Assessment With/Without Basal View for Japanese Children With Unilateral Complete Cleft Lip and Palate.
    Amir MS; Fuchigami T; Kibe T; Tezuka M; Ishihata K; Nakamura N
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2019 Aug; 56(7):953-959. PubMed ID: 30602307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Judgment of Nasolabial Esthetics in Cleft Lip and Palate Is Not Influenced by Overall Facial Attractiveness.
    Kocher K; Kowalski P; Kolokitha OE; Katsaros C; Fudalej PS
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2016 May; 53(3):e45-52. PubMed ID: 25932752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. An Intercenter Comparison of Nasolabial Appearance Including a Center Using Nasoalveolar Molding.
    Peanchitlertkajorn S; Mercado A; Daskalogiannakis J; Hathaway R; Russell K; Semb G; Shaw W; Lamichane M; Cohen M; Long RE
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2018 May; 55(5):655-663. PubMed ID: 29446986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparative evaluation of nasolabial appearance of unilateral cleft lip and palate patients by professional, patient and layperson using 2 aesthetic scoring systems: A cross sectional study.
    Duggal I; Talwar A; Duggal R; Chaudhari PK; Samrit V
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2023 Nov; 26(4):660-666. PubMed ID: 37061872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluation of facial growth in non-cleft patients using the analysis method for patients after a cleft lip and/or palate repair.
    Li CH; Shi B; He X; Meng T
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2010 Feb; 63(2):277-81. PubMed ID: 19158005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Nasolabial appearance in unilateral cleft lip, alveolus and palate: a comparison with Eurocleft.
    Nollet PJ; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; Chatzigianni A; Semb G; Shaw WC; Bronkhorst EM; Katsaros C
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2007; 35(6-7):278-86. PubMed ID: 17904376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Aesthetic evaluation of the nasolabial region in children with unilateral cleft lip and palate comparing expert versus nonexperience health professionals.
    Paiva TS; Andre M; Paiva WS; Mattos BS
    Biomed Res Int; 2014; 2014():460106. PubMed ID: 25126560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Scandcleft randomised trials of primary surgery for unilateral cleft lip and palate: 8. Assessing naso-labial appearance in 5-year-olds - a preliminary study.
    Mølsted K; Humerinta K; Küseler A; Skaare P; Bellardie H; Shaw W; Karsten A; Kåre Sæle P; Rizell S; Marcusson A; Eyres P; Semb G
    J Plast Surg Hand Surg; 2017 Feb; 51(1):64-72. PubMed ID: 28218555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The Americleft study: an inter-center study of treatment outcomes for patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate part 5. General discussion and conclusions.
    Russell K; Long RE; Hathaway R; Daskalogiannakis J; Mercado A; Cohen M; Semb G; Shaw W
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2011 May; 48(3):265-70. PubMed ID: 21219225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Facial attractiveness of patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate and of controls assessed by laypersons and professionals.
    Eichenberger M; Staudt CB; Pandis N; Gnoinski W; Eliades T
    Eur J Orthod; 2014 Jun; 36(3):284-9. PubMed ID: 23832974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Correlation between facial morphology and esthetics in patients with repaired complete unilateral cleft lip and palate.
    Russell KA; Orthod D; Tompson B; Orthod D; Paedo D
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2009 May; 46(3):319-25. PubMed ID: 19642746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Nasolabial aesthetics of patients with repaired unilateral cleft lip and palate: A comparison of three rating methods in two countries.
    Nguyen VT; Nguyen T; Jagomägi T
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 Aug; 46(8):1385-1389. PubMed ID: 29861405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The Americleft study: an inter-center study of treatment outcomes for patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate part 2. Dental arch relationships.
    Hathaway R; Daskalogiannakis J; Mercado A; Russell K; Long RE; Cohen M; Semb G; Shaw W
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2011 May; 48(3):244-51. PubMed ID: 21219228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of Three Methods of Rating Nasolabial Appearance in Cleft Lip and Palate.
    Fudalej SA; Desmedt D; Bronkhorst E; Fudalej PS
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2017 Jul; 54(4):400-407. PubMed ID: 28140671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Nasolabial symmetry and aesthetics in children with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate.
    Fudalej P; Katsaros C; Hozyasz K; Borstlap WA; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Oct; 50(7):621-5. PubMed ID: 22245268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluation of 5-year-old children with complete cleft lip and palate: Multicenter study. Part 1: Lip and nose aesthetic results.
    Dissaux C; Bodin F; Grollemund B; Picard A; Vazquez MP; Morand B; James I; Kauffmann I; Bruant-Rodier C
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Dec; 43(10):2085-92. PubMed ID: 26515264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Appreciation of cleft lip and palate treatment outcome by professionals and laypeople.
    Papamanou DA; Gkantidis N; Topouzelis N; Christou P
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Oct; 34(5):553-60. PubMed ID: 21771802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Nasolabial symmetry and esthetics in cleft lip and palate: analysis of 3D facial images.
    Desmedt DJ; Maal TJ; Kuijpers MA; Bronkhorst EM; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; Fudalej PS
    Clin Oral Investig; 2015 Nov; 19(8):1833-42. PubMed ID: 25802221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A novel computer system for the evaluation of nasolabial morphology, symmetry and aesthetics after cleft lip and palate treatment. Part 2: Comparative anthropometric analysis of patients with repaired unilateral complete cleft lip and palate and healthy individuals.
    Pietruski P; Majak M; Pawlowska E; Skiba A; Antoszewski B
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 Apr; 45(4):505-514. PubMed ID: 28258919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.