149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14726047)
1. Skeletonization versus pedicle preparation of the radial artery with and without the ultrasonic scalpel.
Rukosujew A; Reichelt R; Fabricius AM; Drees G; Tjan TD; Rothenburger M; Hoffmeier A; Scheld HH; Schmid C
Ann Thorac Surg; 2004 Jan; 77(1):120-5. PubMed ID: 14726047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Harvest of the radial artery: technique of the skeletonization and pedicle preparation.
Rukosujew A; Hoffmeier A; Rothenburger M; Löher A; Etz C; Ghezelbash F; Scheld HH; Schmid C
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 2005 Oct; 46(5):509-14. PubMed ID: 16278643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ultrastructural Investigations of Arterial Bypass Conduits after the Use of Different Harvesting Techniques Using an Electron Microscope.
Uyar İS; Kahraman D; Keskin G; Khalil E
Heart Surg Forum; 2020 Feb; 23(1):E070-E075. PubMed ID: 32118547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of harmonic scalpel and high-frequency electrocautery in radial artery harvesting.
Erkut B; Unlu Y; Karapolat S; Ugur Kocogullari C; Ceviz M; Becit N; Kocak H
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 2008 Jun; 49(3):371-9. PubMed ID: 18446124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Harvesting of the radial artery for coronary artery bypass grafting: comparison of ultrasonic harmonic scalpel dissector with the conventional technique.
Fawzy HF
J Card Surg; 2009; 24(3):285-9. PubMed ID: 19302198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of ultrasonically activated scalpel and traditional technique in radial artery harvesting; an electron microscopic evaluation.
Dumantepe M; Kehlibar T; Güllü AU; Arslan Y; Yılmaz M; Berköz K; Tarhan IA; Ozler A
Anadolu Kardiyol Derg; 2011 May; 11(3):250-6. PubMed ID: 21466994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Technical aspects of harvesting the radial artery with the harmonic scalpel.
Locker C; Ben-Gal Y; Paz Y; Lev-Ran O; Nesher N; Uretzky G; Mohr R; Shapira I
Heart Surg Forum; 2003; 6(5):345-7. PubMed ID: 14721806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Endothelial integrity of ultrasonically skeletonized internal thoracic artery: morphological analysis with scanning electron microscopy.
Yoshikai M; Ito T; Kamohara K; Yunoki J
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2004 Feb; 25(2):208-11. PubMed ID: 14747114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Sharp Dissection, Electrocautery, and Ultrasonic Activated Scalpel with Regard to Endothelial Damage, Preparation Time, and Postoperative Bleeding During Radial Artery Harvesting.
Uysal D; Gülmen Ş; Özkan H; Sağlam U; Etli M; Bircan S; Sütçü R; Yavuz T; Öntaş H; Aksoy F
Braz J Cardiovasc Surg; 2019 Dec; 34(6):667-673. PubMed ID: 31364343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of ultrasonically activated scalpel and traditional technique in radial artery harvesting: clinical research.
Oz BS; Mataraci I; Iyem H; Kuralay E; Doganci S; Demirkilic U; Yokusoglu M; Tatar H
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2007 Mar; 55(2):104-7. PubMed ID: 17377863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Easy harvesting of radial artery with ultrasonically activated scalpel.
Psacioğlu H; Atay Y; Cetindağ B; Saribülbül O; Buket S; Hamulu A
Ann Thorac Surg; 1998 Apr; 65(4):984-5. PubMed ID: 9564914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Change of luminal diameter of skeletonized and non-skeletonized radial artery graft at early and late postoperative period.
Maruyama T; Kohno H; Ishida K; Ishizaka T; Funabashi N; Kobayashi Y; Matsumiya G
Heart Vessels; 2016 Apr; 31(4):474-81. PubMed ID: 25656931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sharp dissection versus electrocautery for radial artery harvesting.
Marzban M; Arya R; Mandegar MH; Karimi AA; Abbasi K; Movahed N; Abbasi SH
Tex Heart Inst J; 2006; 33(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 16572861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Technical aspects in skeletonization of the internal thoracic artery using an ultrasonic scalpel.
Menezes AM; Vasconcelos FP; Lima Rde C; Costa MG; Escobar MA
Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc; 2007; 22(2):206-11. PubMed ID: 17992326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quicker yet safe: skeletonization of 1640 internal mammary arteries with harmonic technology in 965 patients.
Kieser TM; Rose MS; Aluthman U; Narine K
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2014 May; 45(5):e142-50. PubMed ID: 24574446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Graft harvesting in coronary artery bypass grafting].
Hosono M; Suehiro S
Kyobu Geka; 2010 Jul; 63(8 Suppl):666-70. PubMed ID: 20715437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reevaluation of two techniques of harvesting the skeletonized internal mammary artery.
Peivandi AA; Weigang E; Kayhan N; Hakami L; Ister D; Denk K; Conzelmann LO; Vahl CF
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2009 Jun; 57(4):214-6. PubMed ID: 19670114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Skeletonization with an ultrasonic scalpel is as safe as a non-skeletonized dissection in preserving the endothelial function of the human gastroepiploic artery.
Shi J; Iesaki T; Kubota N; Sumiyoshi K; Kajimoto K; Kikuchi K; Daida H; Amano A
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2009 Feb; 8(2):216-20. PubMed ID: 19000990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Radial artery harvest: comparison of ultrasonic dissection with standard technique.
Ronan JW; Perry LA; Barner HB; Sundt TM
Ann Thorac Surg; 2000 Jan; 69(1):113-4. PubMed ID: 10654497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Harvesting of the radial artery: subfasciotomy or full skeletonization: a comparative study.
Kucukarslan N; Kirilmaz A; Sungun M; Ozal E; Ulusoy RE; Sanisoglu Y; Tatar H
J Card Surg; 2008; 23(4):341-5. PubMed ID: 18598325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
