BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

460 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14726050)

  • 1. Left ventricular pressure and volume unloading during pulsatile versus nonpulsatile left ventricular assist device support.
    Klotz S; Deng MC; Stypmann J; Roetker J; Wilhelm MJ; Hammel D; Scheld HH; Schmid C
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2004 Jan; 77(1):143-9; discussion 149-50. PubMed ID: 14726050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sympathetic neural and hemodynamic responses to upright tilt in patients with pulsatile and nonpulsatile left ventricular assist devices.
    Markham DW; Fu Q; Palmer MD; Drazner MH; Meyer DM; Bethea BT; Hastings JL; Fujimoto N; Shibata S; Levine BD
    Circ Heart Fail; 2013 Mar; 6(2):293-9. PubMed ID: 23250982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical outcomes are similar in pulsatile and nonpulsatile left ventricular assist device recipients.
    Feller ED; Sorensen EN; Haddad M; Pierson RN; Johnson FL; Brown JM; Griffith BP
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2007 Mar; 83(3):1082-8. PubMed ID: 17307463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Myocardial Structural and Functional Response After Long-Term Mechanical Unloading With Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device: Axial Versus Centrifugal Flow.
    Al-Sarie M; Rauf A; Kfoury AG; Catino A; Wever-Pinzon J; Bonios M; Horne BD; Diakos NA; Wever-Pinzon O; McKellar SH; Kelkhoff A; McCreath L; Fang J; Stehlik J; Selzman CH; Drakos SG
    JACC Heart Fail; 2016 Jul; 4(7):570-576. PubMed ID: 27179831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of pulsatile- and continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices on left ventricular unloading.
    Garcia S; Kandar F; Boyle A; Colvin-Adams M; Lliao K; Joyce L; John R
    J Heart Lung Transplant; 2008 Mar; 27(3):261-7. PubMed ID: 18342746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cellular and hemodynamics responses of failing myocardium to continuous flow mechanical circulatory support using the DeBakey-Noon left ventricular assist device: a comparative analysis with pulsatile-type devices.
    Thohan V; Stetson SJ; Nagueh SF; Rivas-Gotz C; Koerner MM; Lafuente JA; Loebe M; Noon GP; Torre-Amione G
    J Heart Lung Transplant; 2005 May; 24(5):566-75. PubMed ID: 15896754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Load dependency of right ventricular performance is a major factor to be considered in decision making before ventricular assist device implantation.
    Dandel M; Potapov E; Krabatsch T; Stepanenko A; Löw A; Vierecke J; Knosalla C; Hetzer R
    Circulation; 2013 Sep; 128(11 Suppl 1):S14-23. PubMed ID: 24030398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Myocardial sympathetic innervation and long-term left ventricular mechanical unloading.
    Drakos SG; Athanasoulis T; Malliaras KG; Terrovitis JV; Diakos N; Koudoumas D; Ntalianis AS; Theodoropoulos SP; Yacoub MH; Nanas JN
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2010 Jan; 3(1):64-70. PubMed ID: 20129533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hemodynamic responses to continuous versus pulsatile mechanical unloading of the failing left ventricle.
    Bartoli CR; Giridharan GA; Litwak KN; Sobieski M; Prabhu SD; Slaughter MS; Koenig SC
    ASAIO J; 2010; 56(5):410-6. PubMed ID: 20613490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of continuous-flow and pulsatile-flow blood pumps on reducing pulmonary artery pressure in patients with fixed pulmonary hypertension.
    Ozturk P; Engin AY; Nalbantgil S; Oguz E; Ayik F; Engin C; Yagdi T; Erkul S; Balcioglu O; Ozbaran M
    Artif Organs; 2013 Sep; 37(9):763-7. PubMed ID: 24033601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Postoperative right ventricular failure after left ventricular assist device placement is predicted by preoperative echocardiographic structural, hemodynamic, and functional parameters.
    Raina A; Seetha Rammohan HR; Gertz ZM; Rame JE; Woo YJ; Kirkpatrick JN
    J Card Fail; 2013 Jan; 19(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 23273590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of right and left ventricular responses to left ventricular assist device support in patients with severe heart failure: a primary role of mechanical unloading underlying reverse remodeling.
    Barbone A; Holmes JW; Heerdt PM; The' AH; Naka Y; Joshi N; Daines M; Marks AR; Oz MC; Burkhoff D
    Circulation; 2001 Aug; 104(6):670-5. PubMed ID: 11489773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Novel Left Heart Catheterization Ramp Protocol to Guide Hemodynamic Optimization in Patients Supported With Left Ventricular Assist Device Therapy.
    Rosenbaum AN; Frantz RP; Kushwaha SS; Stulak JM; Maltais S; Behfar A
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2019 Feb; 8(4):e010232. PubMed ID: 30755070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Normalisation of haemodynamics in patients with end-stage heart failure with continuous-flow left ventricular assist device therapy.
    Gupta S; Woldendorp K; Muthiah K; Robson D; Prichard R; Macdonald PS; Keogh AM; Kotlyar E; Jabbour A; Dhital K; Granger E; Spratt P; Jansz P; Hayward CS
    Heart Lung Circ; 2014 Oct; 23(10):963-9. PubMed ID: 24973864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Use of centrifugal left ventricular assist device as a bridge to candidacy in severe heart failure with secondary pulmonary hypertension.
    Kutty RS; Parameshwar J; Lewis C; Catarino PA; Sudarshan CD; Jenkins DP; Dunning JJ; Tsui SS
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2013 Jun; 43(6):1237-42. PubMed ID: 23345184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Gastrointestinal bleeding rates in recipients of nonpulsatile and pulsatile left ventricular assist devices.
    Crow S; John R; Boyle A; Shumway S; Liao K; Colvin-Adams M; Toninato C; Missov E; Pritzker M; Martin C; Garry D; Thomas W; Joyce L
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2009 Jan; 137(1):208-15. PubMed ID: 19154927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improved left ventricular unloading and circulatory support with synchronized pulsatile left ventricular assistance compared with continuous-flow left ventricular assistance in an acute porcine left ventricular failure model.
    Letsou GV; Pate TD; Gohean JR; Kurusz M; Longoria RG; Kaiser L; Smalling RW
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2010 Nov; 140(5):1181-8. PubMed ID: 20546799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of continuous-flow versus pulsatile-flow left ventricular assist devices on myocardial unloading and remodeling.
    Kato TS; Chokshi A; Singh P; Khawaja T; Cheema F; Akashi H; Shahzad K; Iwata S; Homma S; Takayama H; Naka Y; Jorde U; Farr M; Mancini DM; Schulze PC
    Circ Heart Fail; 2011 Sep; 4(5):546-53. PubMed ID: 21765125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Post-cardiac transplant survival after support with a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device: impact of duration of left ventricular assist device support and other variables.
    John R; Pagani FD; Naka Y; Boyle A; Conte JV; Russell SD; Klodell CT; Milano CA; Rogers J; Farrar DJ; Frazier OH
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2010 Jul; 140(1):174-81. PubMed ID: 20447659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of pulsatile and nonpulsatile flow on cerebral perfusion in patients with left ventricular assist devices.
    Cornwell WK; Tarumi T; Aengevaeren VL; Ayers C; Divanji P; Fu Q; Palmer D; Drazner MH; Meyer DM; Bethea BT; Hastings JL; Fujimoto N; Shibata S; Zhang R; Markham DW; Levine BD
    J Heart Lung Transplant; 2014 Dec; 33(12):1295-303. PubMed ID: 25307621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.