These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

340 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14726876)

  • 1. Reflectance confocal microscopy may differentiate acute allergic and irritant contact dermatitis in vivo.
    Swindells K; Burnett N; Rius-Diaz F; González E; Mihm MC; González S
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2004 Feb; 50(2):220-8. PubMed ID: 14726876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pilot study on the sensitivity and specificity of in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy in the diagnosis of allergic contact dermatitis.
    Astner S; Gonzalez E; Cheung A; Rius-Diaz F; González S
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2005 Dec; 53(6):986-92. PubMed ID: 16310059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Non-invasive evaluation of the kinetics of allergic and irritant contact dermatitis.
    Astner S; González E; Cheung AC; Rius-Díaz F; Doukas AG; William F; González S
    J Invest Dermatol; 2005 Feb; 124(2):351-9. PubMed ID: 15675954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Noninvasive evaluation of allergic and irritant contact dermatitis by in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy.
    Astner S; González S; Gonzalez E
    Dermatitis; 2006 Dec; 17(4):182-91. PubMed ID: 17150167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In Vivo Reflectance Confocal Microscopy: Emerging Role in Noninvasive Diagnosis and Monitoring of Eczematous Dermatoses.
    Maarouf M; Costello CM; Gonzalez S; Angulo I; Curiel-Lewandrowski CN; Shi VY
    Actas Dermosifiliogr (Engl Ed); 2019 Oct; 110(8):626-636. PubMed ID: 31202471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Allergic and irritant contact dermatitis.
    Nosbaum A; Vocanson M; Rozieres A; Hennino A; Nicolas JF
    Eur J Dermatol; 2009; 19(4):325-32. PubMed ID: 19447733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Histomorphology and Immunophenotype of Eczematous Skin Lesions Revisited-Skin Biopsies Are Not Reliable in Differentiating Allergic Contact Dermatitis, Irritant Contact Dermatitis, and Atopic Dermatitis.
    Frings VG; Böer-Auer A; Breuer K
    Am J Dermatopathol; 2018 Jan; 40(1):7-16. PubMed ID: 28296664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fluorescence confocal laser scanning microscopy for in vivo imaging of epidermal reactions to two experimental irritants.
    Suihko C; Serup J
    Skin Res Technol; 2008 Nov; 14(4):498-503. PubMed ID: 18937788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sequential application of cold and sodium lauryl sulphate decreases irritation and barrier disruption in vivo in humans.
    Fluhr JW; Bornkessel A; Akengin A; Fuchs S; Norgauer J; Kleesz P; Grieshaber R; Elsner P
    Br J Dermatol; 2005 Apr; 152(4):702-8. PubMed ID: 15840102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparative study of allergic contact dermatitis by patch test versus reflectance confocal laser microscopy, with nickel and cobalt.
    Sakanashi EN; Matsumura M; Kikuchi K; Ikeda M; Miura H
    Eur J Dermatol; 2010; 20(6):705-11. PubMed ID: 20822971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Differentiating allergic and irritant contact dermatitis by high-definition optical coherence tomography: a pilot study.
    Boone MA; Jemec GB; Del Marmol V
    Arch Dermatol Res; 2015 Jan; 307(1):11-22. PubMed ID: 25186162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Irritant Contact Dermatitis.
    Bains SN; Nash P; Fonacier L
    Clin Rev Allergy Immunol; 2019 Feb; 56(1):99-109. PubMed ID: 30293200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Chemokine responses distinguish chemical-induced allergic from irritant skin inflammation: memory T cells make the difference.
    Meller S; Lauerma AI; Kopp FM; Winterberg F; Anthoni M; Müller A; Gombert M; Haahtela A; Alenius H; Rieker J; Dieu-Nosjean MC; Kubitza RC; Gleichmann E; Ruzicka T; Zlotnik A; Homey B
    J Allergy Clin Immunol; 2007 Jun; 119(6):1470-80. PubMed ID: 17337293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Preliminary evaluation of in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy features of Discoid lupus erythematosus.
    Ardigò M; Maliszewski I; Cota C; Scope A; Sacerdoti G; Gonzalez S; Berardesca E
    Br J Dermatol; 2007 Jun; 156(6):1196-203. PubMed ID: 17381451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Electrical impedance as a potential tool to distinguish between allergic and irritant contact dermatitis.
    Nyrén M; Kuzmina N; Emtestam L
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2003 Mar; 48(3):394-400. PubMed ID: 12637919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Allergic contact dermatitis.
    Mark BJ; Slavin RG
    Med Clin North Am; 2006 Jan; 90(1):169-85. PubMed ID: 16310529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visual and confocal microscopic interpretation of patch tests to benzethonium chloride and benzalkonium chloride.
    Benjamin B; Chris F; Salvador G; Melissa G; Susan N
    Skin Res Technol; 2012 Aug; 18(3):272-7. PubMed ID: 22142417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cheilitis: analysis of 75 cases referred to a contact dermatitis clinic.
    Freeman S; Stephens R
    Am J Contact Dermat; 1999 Dec; 10(4):198-200. PubMed ID: 10594294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Contact dermatitis II. Clinical aspects and diagnosis.
    Krasteva M; Kehren J; Sayag M; Ducluzeau MT; Dupuis M; Kanitakis J; Nicolas JF
    Eur J Dermatol; 1999 Mar; 9(2):144-59. PubMed ID: 10066966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diagnostic approach in allergic and irritant contact dermatitis.
    Ale IS; Maibacht HA
    Expert Rev Clin Immunol; 2010 Mar; 6(2):291-310. PubMed ID: 20402391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.