These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14727123)

  • 1. Objective evaluation of the quality of substitution voices.
    Moerman M; Pieters G; Martens JP; Van der Borgt MJ; Dejonckere P
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2004 Nov; 261(10):541-7. PubMed ID: 14727123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The intelligibility of tracheoesophageal speech, with an emphasis on the voiced-voiceless distinction.
    Jongmans P; Hilgers FJ; Pols LC; van As-Brooks CJ
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2006; 31(4):172-81. PubMed ID: 17114130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Automatic intelligibility assessment of speakers after laryngeal cancer by means of acoustic modeling.
    Bocklet T; Riedhammer K; Nöth E; Eysholdt U; Haderlein T
    J Voice; 2012 May; 26(3):390-7. PubMed ID: 21820272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The role of the different neoglottis forms in the development of esophageal voice.
    Tóth A; Csernoch L; Sziklai I; Szűcs A
    Acta Physiol Hung; 2014 Sep; 101(3):291-300. PubMed ID: 24866929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multidimensional assessment of strongly irregular voices such as in substitution voicing and spasmodic dysphonia: a compilation of own research.
    Moerman M; Martens JP; Dejonckere P
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2015 Apr; 40(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 25019410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Influence of Native Language on Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Vocal Samples Completed by Brazilian and Canadian SLPs.
    Chaves CR; Campbell M; Côrtes Gama AC
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):258.e1-258.e5. PubMed ID: 27427162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Voice and speech after laryngectomy.
    Stajner-Katusić S; Horga D; Musura M; Globlek D
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2006; 20(2-3):195-203. PubMed ID: 16428237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The vocal clarity of female speech-language pathology students: an exploratory study.
    Warhurst S; Madill C; McCabe P; Heard R; Yiu E
    J Voice; 2012 Jan; 26(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 21439779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Acoustic voice analysis in phonatory fistuloplasty after total laryngectomy].
    Rosique M; Ramón JL; Campos M; Cervantes J
    Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 1999 Mar; 50(2):129-33. PubMed ID: 10217687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Substitution voicing index: towards improved speech assessment in patients who have undergone laryngeal oncosurgery.
    Pribuisis K; Pribuisiene R; Padervinskis E; Ulozas V
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2023 Jul; 37(7):583-598. PubMed ID: 35656723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cepstral analysis of hypokinetic and ataxic voices: correlations with perceptual and other acoustic measures.
    Jannetts S; Lowit A
    J Voice; 2014 Nov; 28(6):673-80. PubMed ID: 24836365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Severity of voice disorders in children: correlations between perceptual and acoustic data.
    Lopes LW; Barbosa Lima IL; Alves Almeida LN; Cavalcante DP; de Almeida AA
    J Voice; 2012 Nov; 26(6):819.e7-12. PubMed ID: 23177753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Results of rehabilitation of voice and speeches after implantation of valve vocal prosthesis at ill after total removal of larynx].
    Ratajczak J; Wojdas A; Jurkiewicz D
    Otolaryngol Pol; 2008; 62(6):727-30. PubMed ID: 19205520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Comparative evaluation of the voice prosthesis after laryngectomy].
    Kischk BT; Gross M
    HNO; 1995 May; 43(5):304-10. PubMed ID: 7607916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Acoustic and aerodynamic measurement of speech production after supracricoid partial laryngectomy.
    Makeieff M; Barbotte E; Giovanni A; Guerrier B
    Laryngoscope; 2005 Mar; 115(3):546-51. PubMed ID: 15744175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Objective and subjective assessment of tracheoesophageal prosthesis voice outcome.
    D'Alatri L; Bussu F; Scarano E; Paludetti G; Marchese MR
    J Voice; 2012 Sep; 26(5):607-13. PubMed ID: 22209062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Spectrographic differences between tracheal-esophageal and esophageal voice.
    Bertino G; Bellomo A; Miani C; Ferrero F; Staffieri A
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 1996; 48(5):255-61. PubMed ID: 8828283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multidimensional assessment of female tracheoesophageal prosthetic speech.
    Kazi R; Kiverniti E; Prasad V; Venkitaraman R; Nutting CM; Clarke P; Rhys-Evans P; Harrington KJ
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2006 Dec; 31(6):511-7. PubMed ID: 17184457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Acoustic analysis of the voice in phonatory fistuloplasty after total laryngectomy.
    Arias MR; Ramón JL; Campos M; Cervantes JJ
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2000 May; 122(5):743-7. PubMed ID: 10793358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Toward improved ecological validity in the acoustic measurement of overall voice quality: combining continuous speech and sustained vowels.
    Maryn Y; Corthals P; Van Cauwenberge P; Roy N; De Bodt M
    J Voice; 2010 Sep; 24(5):540-55. PubMed ID: 19883993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.