These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1472801)
1. National regulation of and achievements in assisted reproduction in Japan. Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Mori T J Assist Reprod Genet; 1992 Aug; 9(4):293-8. PubMed ID: 1472801 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Ethical considerations of the new reproductive technologies. American Fertility Society. Ethics Committee Fertil Steril; 1986 Sep; 46(3) Suppl. 1):1S-94S. PubMed ID: 11658710 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. In Britain and Australia, new in vitro guidelines. Levine C Hastings Cent Rep; 1983 Feb; 13(1):2. PubMed ID: 11643983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Religious views regarding treatment of infertility by assisted reproductive technologies. Schenker JG J Assist Reprod Genet; 1992 Feb; 9(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 1617246 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Assisted reproduction practice in Europe: legal and ethical aspects. Schenker JG Hum Reprod Update; 1997; 3(2):173-84. PubMed ID: 9286740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Regulations and results concerning assisted reproduction in Sweden. Hamberger L; Wikland M J Assist Reprod Genet; 1993 May; 10(4):243-5. PubMed ID: 8130425 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Rules and ethics concerning assisted procreation established by the government in Germany. Krebs D J Assist Reprod Genet; 1996 Mar; 13(3):193-5. PubMed ID: 11644839 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Current differences and consequences of legislation on practice of assisted reproductive technology in the Nordic countries. The Nordic Committee on Assisted Reproduction of the Scandinavian Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Hazekamp JT Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1996 Feb; 75(2):198-200. PubMed ID: 8604616 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Ethical considerations of the new reproductive technologies. American Fertility Society. Ethics Committee Fertil Steril; 1990 Jun; 53(6) Suppl. 2):i-1S-109S. PubMed ID: 11659223 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Ethical aspects of advanced reproductive technologies. Schenker JG Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2003 Nov; 997():11-21. PubMed ID: 14644805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assisted reproduction in contemporary Jewish law and ethics. Grazi RV; Wolowelsky JB; Jewelewicz R Gynecol Obstet Invest; 1994; 37(4):217-25. PubMed ID: 8050723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fertility innovation or exploitation? Weiss R Washington Post; 1998 Feb; ():A1, A12. PubMed ID: 11648092 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Assisted reproduction: a process ripe for regulation? A conference of the National Advisory Board on Ethics in Reproduction. Jonsen AR; Macklin R; White GB Womens Health Issues; 1996; 6(3):117-21. PubMed ID: 8672893 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The status of regulation of assisted reproductive technology in the United States. Jones HW J Assist Reprod Genet; 1993 Jul; 10(5):331-6. PubMed ID: 8003876 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. FIGO Committee for the study of ethical aspects of human reproduction. Guidelines regarding informed consent. International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Schenker JG Ginekol Pol; 1996 Nov; 67(11):581-2. PubMed ID: 9289447 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Legal and ethical aspects in assisted reproductive techniques. The debate in Spain. Boada M; Veiga A; Quintana O Rev Derecho Genoma Hum; 2002; (17):205-14. PubMed ID: 12703115 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]