These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14728302)

  • 1. The Certainty-Agreement diagram: comparing the functionality of coding schemes in primary care clinical information systems.
    Brown PJ; Warmington V
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2003; 2003():797. PubMed ID: 14728302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A methodology for the functional comparison of coding schemes in primary care.
    Brown PJ; Warmington V; Laurence M; Prevost AT
    Inform Prim Care; 2003; 11(3):145-8. PubMed ID: 14680537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Randomised crossover trial comparing the performance of Clinical Terms Version 3 and Read Codes 5 byte set coding schemes in general practice.
    Brown PJ; Warmington V; Laurence M; Prevost AT
    BMJ; 2003 May; 326(7399):1127. PubMed ID: 12763986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Toward a model for the evaluation of clinical coding systems.
    Bolton P; Warren J
    Aust Fam Physician; 2001 Aug; 30(8):814-6. PubMed ID: 11681160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The connection between terms used in medical records and coding system: a study on Swedish primary health care data.
    Petersson H; Nilsson G; Strender LE; Ahlfeldt H
    Med Inform Internet Med; 2001; 26(2):87-99. PubMed ID: 11560294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Variation in the recording of diabetes diagnostic data in primary care computer systems: implications for the quality of care.
    Rollason W; Khunti K; de Lusignan S
    Inform Prim Care; 2009; 17(2):113-9. PubMed ID: 19807953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An overview of coding and its relationship to standardized clinical terminology.
    Peden AH
    Top Health Inf Manage; 2000 Nov; 21(2):1-9. PubMed ID: 11143274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Premillennial and postmillennial coding.
    Morgan J
    Top Health Inf Manage; 2000 Nov; 21(2):81-4. PubMed ID: 11143284
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Delving into computer-assisted coding.
    AHIMA computer-assisted coding e-HIM work group
    J AHIMA; 2004; 75(10):48A-48H. PubMed ID: 15559840
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Safe at home. Remote coding meets HIPAA.
    Keough T
    J AHIMA; 2004 Feb; 75(2):42-6; quiz 47-8. PubMed ID: 14981854
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. ICD9 Code Assistant: A prototype.
    Erdal S; Ding J; Osborn C; Mekhjian H; Kamal J
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2007 Oct; ():950. PubMed ID: 18694050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Time on your side. Interface to coding system saves hours each day at acute care facility.
    Collins D
    Healthc Inform; 2000 Sep; 17(9):109-10. PubMed ID: 11187302
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. MediClass: A system for detecting and classifying encounter-based clinical events in any electronic medical record.
    Hazlehurst B; Frost HR; Sittig DF; Stevens VJ
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2005; 12(5):517-29. PubMed ID: 15905485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does size matter?--Evaluation of value added content of two decades of successive coding schemes in secondary care.
    Brown PJ; Odusanya L
    Proc AMIA Symp; 2001; ():71-5. PubMed ID: 11825157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Managers see the problems associated with coding clinical data as a technical issue whilst clinicians also see cultural barriers.
    de Lusignan S; Wells SE; Hague NJ; Thiru K
    Methods Inf Med; 2003; 42(4):416-22. PubMed ID: 14534643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Documentation and coding of ED patient encounters: an evaluation of the accuracy of an electronic medical record.
    Silfen E
    Am J Emerg Med; 2006 Oct; 24(6):664-78. PubMed ID: 16984834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In for the long haul. PHRs, computer-assisted coding touted at AHIMA.
    Conn J
    Mod Healthc; 2006 Oct; 36(41):16. PubMed ID: 17086955
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Regional variation in medical classification agreement: benchmarking the coding gap.
    Lorence D
    J Med Syst; 2003 Oct; 27(5):435-43. PubMed ID: 14584620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Representation of clinical problem assessment phrases in U.S. family practice using Read version 3.1 terms: a preliminary study.
    Hausam RR; Hahn AW
    Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care; 1995; ():426-30. PubMed ID: 8563317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of three Swedish ICD-10 primary care versions: reliability and ease of use in diagnostic coding.
    Nilsson G; Petersson H; Ahlfeldt H; Strender LE
    Methods Inf Med; 2000 Dec; 39(4-5):325-31. PubMed ID: 11191701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.