These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

67 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14728335)

  • 1. Electronic access to care system: improving patient's access to clinical information through an Interactive Voice Response (IVR) system and Web portal.
    Do N; Marinkovich A; Koisch J; Wheeler G
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2003; 2003():830. PubMed ID: 14728335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A randomized experiment investigating the suitability of speech-enabled IVR and Web modes for publicly reported surveys of patients' experience of hospital care.
    Elliott MN; Brown JA; Lehrman WG; Beckett MK; Hambarsoomian K; Giordano LA; Goldstein EH
    Med Care Res Rev; 2013 Apr; 70(2):165-84. PubMed ID: 23132892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Patients' perceptions of a Web portal offering clinic messaging and personal health information.
    Volk LA; Pizziferri L; Wald J; Bates DW
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2005; 2005():1147. PubMed ID: 16779433
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interactive voice response systems for medication identification requests: poison or cure?
    Benson BE
    Clin Toxicol (Phila); 2011 Nov; 49(9):799-800. PubMed ID: 22077245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A regional poison information center IVR medication identification system: does it accomplish its goal?
    Krenzelok EP; Mrvos R
    Clin Toxicol (Phila); 2011 Nov; 49(9):858-61. PubMed ID: 22077249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An Internet-based patient-provider communication system: randomized controlled trial.
    Lin CT; Wittevrongel L; Moore L; Beaty BL; Ross SE
    J Med Internet Res; 2005 Aug; 7(4):e47. PubMed ID: 16236699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Do Patients Who Access Clinical Information on Patient Internet Portals Have More Primary Care Visits?
    Leveille SG; Mejilla R; Ngo L; Fossa A; Elmore JG; Darer J; Ralston JD; Delbanco T; Walker J
    Med Care; 2016 Jan; 54(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 26565525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Integrating voice recognition and EMR cuts transcription time, costs.
    Perform Improv Advis; 2005 Nov; 9(11):130-2, 121. PubMed ID: 16363106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Giving office-based physicians electronic access to patients' prior imaging and lab results did not deter ordering of tests.
    McCormick D; Bor DH; Woolhandler S; Himmelstein DU
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2012 Mar; 31(3):488-96. PubMed ID: 22392659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Consent-based access to core EHR information: the SUMO-project.
    Heimly V
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 136():431-6. PubMed ID: 18487769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Privacy and efficiency in patients focused health care processes.
    Morger O; Nitsche U; Teufel S
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1998; 52 Pt 2():1143-7. PubMed ID: 10384638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Who uses the patient internet portal? The PatientSite experience.
    Weingart SN; Rind D; Tofias Z; Sands DZ
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2006; 13(1):91-5. PubMed ID: 16221943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Patient-focused nursing documentation expressed by nurses.
    Laitinen H; Kaunonen M; Astedt-Kurki P
    J Clin Nurs; 2010 Feb; 19(3-4):489-97. PubMed ID: 20500288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Experiences with a prototype tracking and verification system implemented within an imaging center.
    Guo B; Documet J; Lee J; Liu B; King N; Shrestha R; Wang K; Huang HK; Grant EG
    Acad Radiol; 2007 Mar; 14(3):270-8. PubMed ID: 17307659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Exploring challenges and potentials of personal health records in diabetes self-management: implementation and initial assessment.
    Hess R; Bryce CL; Paone S; Fischer G; McTigue KM; Olshansky E; Zickmund S; Fitzgerald K; Siminerio L
    Telemed J E Health; 2007 Oct; 13(5):509-17. PubMed ID: 17999613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ontology-based framework for electronic health records interoperability.
    González C; Blobel BG; López DM
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2011; 169():694-8. PubMed ID: 21893836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Initial evaluation of a computer-based medication management tool in a geriatric clinic.
    Hornick TR; Higgins PA; Stollings C; Wetzel L; Barzilai K; Wolpaw D
    Am J Geriatr Pharmacother; 2006 Mar; 4(1):62-9. PubMed ID: 16730622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A study of user requests regarding the fully electronic health record system at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital: challenges for future electronic health record systems.
    Yoo S; Kim S; Lee S; Lee KH; Baek RM; Hwang H
    Int J Med Inform; 2013 May; 82(5):387-97. PubMed ID: 22959193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multisite regional telephone care.
    Schwartz F; Genovese L; Devitt K; Gottlieb T
    Nurs Clin North Am; 2000 Jun; 35(2):527-39. PubMed ID: 10873265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use and satisfaction of a patient Web portal with a shared medical record between patients and providers.
    Ralston JD; Hereford J; Carrell D
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2006; 2006():1070. PubMed ID: 17238689
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.