149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14728468)
21. Automated classification of eligibility criteria in clinical trials to facilitate patient-trial matching for specific patient populations.
Zhang K; Demner-Fushman D
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2017 Jul; 24(4):781-787. PubMed ID: 28339690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Automatic data source identification for clinical trial eligibility criteria resolution.
Shivade C; Hebert C; Regan K; Fosler-Lussier E; Lai AM
AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2016; 2016():1149-1158. PubMed ID: 28269912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. RuleEd, a web-based semantic network interface for constructing and revising computable eligibility rules.
Olasov B; Sim I
AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2006; 2006():1051. PubMed ID: 17238670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Parsable Clinical Trial Eligibility Criteria Representation Using Natural Language Processing.
Kim J; Izower M; Quintana Y
AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2022; 2022():616-624. PubMed ID: 37128426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Repurposing the clinical record: can an existing natural language processing system de-identify clinical notes?
Morrison FP; Li L; Lai AM; Hripcsak G
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2009; 16(1):37-9. PubMed ID: 18952938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Decision support for clinical trial eligibility determination in breast cancer.
Ohno-Machado L; Wang SJ; Mar P; Boxwala AA
Proc AMIA Symp; 1999; ():340-4. PubMed ID: 10566377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Sharable representation of clinical guidelines in GLIF: relationship to the Arden Syntax.
Peleg M; Boxwala AA; Bernstam E; Tu S; Greenes RA; Shortliffe EH
J Biomed Inform; 2001 Jun; 34(3):170-81. PubMed ID: 11723699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Use of natural language programming to extract medication from unstructured electronic medical records.
Chhieng D; Day T; Gordon G; Hicks J
AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2007 Oct; ():908. PubMed ID: 18694008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Conformity between protocol eligibility criteria for electronic patient identification: a comparison of clinical trials.
Kamauu A; Agbor S; Kamauu A
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 192():1167. PubMed ID: 23920941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Automated Matching of Patients to Clinical Trials: A Patient-Centric Natural Language Processing Approach for Pediatric Leukemia.
Kaskovich S; Wyatt KD; Oliwa T; Graglia L; Furner B; Lee J; Mayampurath A; Volchenboum SL
JCO Clin Cancer Inform; 2023 Jul; 7():e2300009. PubMed ID: 37428994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Development of Markup Language for Medical Record Charting: A Charting Language.
Jung WM; Chae Y; Jang BH
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2015; 216():879. PubMed ID: 26262181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Artificial Intelligence Tool for Optimizing Eligibility Screening for Clinical Trials in a Large Community Cancer Center.
Beck JT; Rammage M; Jackson GP; Preininger AM; Dankwa-Mullan I; Roebuck MC; Torres A; Holtzen H; Coverdill SE; Williamson MP; Chau Q; Rhee K; Vinegra M
JCO Clin Cancer Inform; 2020 Jan; 4():50-59. PubMed ID: 31977254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Towards Phenotyping of Clinical Trial Eligibility Criteria.
Löbe M; Stäubert S; Goldberg C; Haffner I; Winter A
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2018; 248():293-299. PubMed ID: 29726450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Desiderata for Major Eligibility Criteria in Breast Cancer Clinical Trials.
Paulson ML; Weng C
AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2015; 2015():2025-34. PubMed ID: 26958302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The use of DRG for identifying clinical trials centers with high recruitment potential: a feasability study.
Aegerter P; Bendersky N; Tran TC; Ropers J; Taright N; Chatellier G
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2014; 205():783-7. PubMed ID: 25160294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Computer-based screening of patients with HIV/AIDS for clinical-trial eligibility.
Carlson RW; Tu SW; Lane NM; Lai TL; Kemper CA; Musen MA; Shortliffe EH
Online J Curr Clin Trials; 1995 Mar; Doc No 179():[3347 words; 32 paragraphs]. PubMed ID: 7719564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Using an information warehouse to screen patients for clinical trials: a prototype.
Kamal J; Pasuparthi K; Rogers P; Buskirk J; Mekhjian H
AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2005; 2005():1004. PubMed ID: 16779291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Interface for electronic data capture systems for clinical trials by optimal utilization of available hospital resources.
Kaushik S; Khan A; Kaushik S; Lindenmayer JP
AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2008 Nov; ():998. PubMed ID: 18999083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Current trends with natural language processing.
Rassinoux AM; Michel PA; Wagner J; Baud R
Medinfo; 1995; 8 Pt 2():1657. PubMed ID: 8591530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A review of research on eligibility criteria for clinical trials.
Su Q; Cheng G; Huang J
Clin Exp Med; 2023 Oct; 23(6):1867-1879. PubMed ID: 36602707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
