These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14728483)

  • 1. Evaluation of the implementation of an electronic medical record.
    Raman S; Harris IB; Connelly DP; Speedie SM; Daniels B
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2003; 2003():979. PubMed ID: 14728483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluating physician satisfaction regarding user interactions with an electronic medical record system.
    Sittig DF; Kuperman GJ; Fiskio J
    Proc AMIA Symp; 1999; ():400-4. PubMed ID: 10566389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An electronic medical record in primary care: impact on satisfaction, work efficiency and clinic processes.
    Joos D; Chen Q; Jirjis J; Johnson KB
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2006; 2006():394-8. PubMed ID: 17238370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. No paper, but the same routines: a qualitative exploration of experiences in two Norwegian hospitals deprived of the paper based medical record.
    Lium JT; Tjora A; Faxvaag A
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2008 Jan; 8():2. PubMed ID: 18186935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Electronic medical records: are physicians ready?
    Dansky KH; Gamm LD; Vasey JJ; Barsukiewicz CK
    J Healthc Manag; 1999; 44(6):440-54; discussion 454-5. PubMed ID: 10662431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Measuring the success of electronic medical record implementation using electronic and survey data.
    Keshavjee K; Troyan S; Holbrook AM; VanderMolen D;
    Proc AMIA Symp; 2001; ():309-13. PubMed ID: 11825201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Differing faculty and housestaff acceptance of an electronic health record one year after implementation.
    Hier DB; Rothschild A; LeMaistre A; Keeler J
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 107(Pt 2):1300-3. PubMed ID: 15361024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using a phased-in incremental approach to EMR implementation.
    McGrath D
    J Med Pract Manage; 2009; 24(6):355-7. PubMed ID: 19663360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A physician's perspective: deploying the EMR.
    Smith D; Newell LM
    J Healthc Inf Manag; 2002; 16(2):71-9. PubMed ID: 11941926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pre-post evaluation of physicians' satisfaction with a redesigned electronic medical record system.
    Jaspers MW; Peute LW; Lauteslager A; Bakker PJ
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 136():303-8. PubMed ID: 18487748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. AOFAS member experience with computerization of the office.
    Michelson JD; Speer JA
    Foot Ankle Int; 2005 Aug; 26(8):645-55. PubMed ID: 16115423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measuring clinicians' expectations prior to EHR implementation.
    Cantor MN; Raucher BG
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2005; 2005():911. PubMed ID: 16779198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Faculty, resident, and clinic staff's evaluation of the effects of EHR implementation.
    Bloom MV; Huntington MK
    Fam Med; 2010 Sep; 42(8):562-6. PubMed ID: 20830621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comprehensive information technology system to support physician learning at the point of care.
    Cook DA; Sorensen KJ; Nishimura RA; Ommen SR; Lloyd FJ
    Acad Med; 2015 Jan; 90(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 25374037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Electronic medical records in somatic hospitals--availability and clinical use].
    Laerum H; Ellingsen G; Faxvaag A
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2002 Oct; 122(26):2540-3. PubMed ID: 12522880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pre- and post-control model research on end-users' satisfaction with an electronic medical record: preliminary results.
    Gamm LD; Barsukiewicz CK; Dansky KH; Vasey JJ; Bisordi JE; Thompson PC
    Proc AMIA Symp; 1998; ():225-9. PubMed ID: 9929215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A tale of two hospitals: a sociotechnical appraisal of the introduction of computerized physician order entry in two Dutch hospitals.
    Aarts J; Berg M
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 107(Pt 2):999-1002. PubMed ID: 15360962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of a commercial electronic medical record (EMR) by primary care physicians 5 years after implementation.
    Kaelber D; Greco P; Cebul RD
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2005; 2005():1002. PubMed ID: 16779289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Attitudes of academic-based and community-based physicians regarding EMR use during outpatient encounters.
    Penrod LE; Gadd CS
    Proc AMIA Symp; 2001; ():528-32. PubMed ID: 11825244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Validation of a nurses' views on electronic medical record systems (EMR) questionnaire in Turkish health system.
    Top M; Yilmaz A; Karabulut E; Otieno OG; Saylam M; Bakır S; Top S
    J Med Syst; 2015 Jun; 39(6):67. PubMed ID: 25957164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.