205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14730421)
1. The validity of decision rules for selecting women with primary osteoporosis for bone mineral density testing.
Cadarette SM; McIsaac WJ; Hawker GA; Jaakkimainen L; Culbert A; Zarifa G; Ola E; Jaglal SB
Osteoporos Int; 2004 May; 15(5):361-6. PubMed ID: 14730421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Development and validation of the osteoporosis prescreening risk assessment (OPERA) tool to facilitate identification of women likely to have low bone density.
Salaffi F; Silveri F; Stancati A; Grassi W
Clin Rheumatol; 2005 Jun; 24(3):203-11. PubMed ID: 15549501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Decision rules for selecting women for bone mineral density testing: application in postmenopausal women referred to a bone densitometry unit.
Martínez-Aguilà D; Gómez-Vaquero C; Rozadilla A; Romera M; Narváez J; Nolla JM
J Rheumatol; 2007 Jun; 34(6):1307-12. PubMed ID: 17552058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Development and validation of the Osteoporosis Risk Assessment Instrument to facilitate selection of women for bone densitometry.
Cadarette SM; Jaglal SB; Kreiger N; McIsaac WJ; Darlington GA; Tu JV
CMAJ; 2000 May; 162(9):1289-94. PubMed ID: 10813010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of decision rules for referring women for bone densitometry by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry.
Cadarette SM; Jaglal SB; Murray TM; McIsaac WJ; Joseph L; Brown JP;
JAMA; 2001 Jul; 286(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 11434827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. BFH-OST, a new predictive screening tool for identifying osteoporosis in postmenopausal Han Chinese women.
Ma Z; Yang Y; Lin J; Zhang X; Meng Q; Wang B; Fei Q
Clin Interv Aging; 2016; 11():1051-9. PubMed ID: 27536085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Performance of four clinical screening tools to select peri- and early postmenopausal women for dual X-ray absorptiometry.
Rud B; Jensen JE; Mosekilde L; Nielsen SP; Hilden J; Abrahamsen B
Osteoporos Int; 2005 Jul; 16(7):764-72. PubMed ID: 15986263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A clinical decision rule to enhance targeted bone mineral density testing in healthy mid-life women.
Hawker G; Mendel A; Lam MA; Akhavan PS; Cancino-Romero J; Waugh E; Jamal S; Mian S; Jaglal S
Osteoporos Int; 2012 Jul; 23(7):1931-8. PubMed ID: 22159633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validation and comparative evaluation of the osteoporosis self-assessment tool (OST) in a Caucasian population from Belgium.
Richy F; Gourlay M; Ross PD; Sen SS; Radican L; De Ceulaer F; Ben Sedrine W; Ethgen O; Bruyere O; Reginster JY
QJM; 2004 Jan; 97(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 14702510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Risk Assessment Tools for Osteoporosis Screening in Postmenopausal Women: A Systematic Review.
Crandall CJ
Curr Osteoporos Rep; 2015 Oct; 13(5):287-301. PubMed ID: 26233285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Discriminatory Performance of the Calcaneal Quantitative Ultrasound and Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool to Select Older Women for Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry.
McLeod KM; Johnson S; Rasali D; Verma A
J Clin Densitom; 2015; 18(2):157-64. PubMed ID: 25937306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validation of osteoporosis risk assessment tools in middle-aged Thai women.
Indhavivadhana S; Rattanachaiyanont M; Angsuwathana S; Techatraisak K; Tanmahasamut P; Leerasiri P
Climacteric; 2016 Dec; 19(6):588-593. PubMed ID: 27667093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of decision rules for identifying low bone density in postmenopausal African-American women.
Wallace LS; Ballard JE; Holiday D; Turner LW; Keenum AJ; Pearman CM
J Natl Med Assoc; 2004 Mar; 96(3):290-6. PubMed ID: 15040510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparative study of computed digital absorptiometry and conventional dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in postmenopausal women.
Fiter J; Nolla JM; Gómez-Vaquero C; Martínez-Aguilá D; Valverde J; Roig-Escofet D
Osteoporos Int; 2001; 12(7):565-9. PubMed ID: 11527054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of Clinical Risk Tools for Predicting Osteoporosis in Women Ages 50-64.
Pecina JL; Romanovsky L; Merry SP; Kennel KA; Thacher TD
J Am Board Fam Med; 2016; 29(2):233-9. PubMed ID: 26957380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. FRAX without bone mineral density versus osteoporosis self-assessment screening tool as predictors of osteoporosis in primary screening of individuals aged 70 and older.
Pang WY; Inderjeeth CA
J Am Geriatr Soc; 2014 Mar; 62(3):442-6. PubMed ID: 24617899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Identification of women at increased risk of osteoporosis: no need to use different screening tools at different ages.
Dargent-Molina P; Piault S; Bréart G
Maturitas; 2006 Apr; 54(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 16202546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool versus alternative tests for selecting postmenopausal women for bone mineral density assessment: a comparative systematic review of accuracy.
Rud B; Hilden J; Hyldstrup L; Hróbjartsson A
Osteoporos Int; 2009 Apr; 20(4):599-607. PubMed ID: 18716823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Screening for osteoporosis using easily obtainable biometrical data: diagnostic accuracy of measured, self-reported and recalled BMI, and related costs of bone mineral density measurements.
van der Voort DJ; Brandon S; Dinant GJ; van Wersch JW
Osteoporos Int; 2000; 11(3):233-9. PubMed ID: 10824239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical performance of osteoporosis risk assessment tools in women aged 67 years and older.
Gourlay ML; Powers JM; Lui LY; Ensrud KE;
Osteoporos Int; 2008 Aug; 19(8):1175-83. PubMed ID: 18219434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
