These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14732200)

  • 21. Evidence that activation following failed defibrillation is not caused by triggered activity.
    Zheng X; Walcott GP; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2005 Nov; 16(11):1200-5. PubMed ID: 16302904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effects of defibrillation shock energy and timing on 3-D computer model of heart.
    Province RA; Fishler MG; Thakor NV
    Ann Biomed Eng; 1993; 21(1):19-31. PubMed ID: 8434817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Preshock phase singularity and the outcome of ventricular defibrillation.
    Hayashi H; Lin SF; Chen PS
    Heart Rhythm; 2007 Jul; 4(7):927-34. PubMed ID: 17599680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Delayed afterdepolarization inhibitor: a potential pharmacologic intervention to improve defibrillation efficacy.
    Chattipakorn N; Ideker RE
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2003 Jan; 14(1):72-5. PubMed ID: 12625614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of rapid biphasic shock subpulse switching on ventricular defibrillation thresholds.
    Dosdall DJ; Rothe DE; Brandon TA; Sweeney JD
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2004 Jul; 15(7):802-8. PubMed ID: 15250866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Direct evidence of the role of virtual electrode-induced phase singularity in success and failure of defibrillation.
    Efimov IR; Cheng Y; Yamanouchi Y; Tchou PJ
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2000 Aug; 11(8):861-8. PubMed ID: 10969748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The potential gradient field created by epicardial defibrillation electrodes in dogs.
    Chen PS; Wolf PD; Claydon FJ; Dixon EG; Vidaillet HJ; Danieley ND; Pilkington TC; Ideker RE
    Circulation; 1986 Sep; 74(3):626-36. PubMed ID: 3742760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Predicting the potential gradient field in ventricular fibrillation from shocks delivered in paced rhythm.
    Idriss SF; Melnick SB; Wolf PD; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    Am J Physiol; 1995 Jun; 268(6 Pt 2):H2336-44. PubMed ID: 7611485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of the defibrillation threshold and the upper limit of ventricular vulnerability.
    Chen PS; Shibata N; Dixon EG; Martin RO; Ideker RE
    Circulation; 1986 May; 73(5):1022-8. PubMed ID: 3698224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effect of pinacidil on postshock activation and ventricular defibrillation threshold in canine hearts.
    Jin Q; Zhang N; Zhou J; Lin CJ; Pang Y; Gu G; Shen WF; Wu LQ
    Acta Pharmacol Sin; 2012 Dec; 33(12):1488-94. PubMed ID: 23064720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effects of high-frequency biphasic shocks on ventricular vulnerability and defibrillation outcomes through synchronized virtual electrode responses.
    Chiou YA; Cheng LK; Lin SF
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(5):e0232529. PubMed ID: 32357163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. On the mechanism of the probabilistic nature of ventricular defibrillation threshold.
    Yashima M; Kim YH; Armin S; Wu TJ; Miyauchi Y; Mandel WJ; Chen PS; Karagueuzian HS
    Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol; 2003 Jan; 284(1):H249-55. PubMed ID: 12388279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Activation sequences following failed atrial defibrillation.
    Zheng X; Huang J; Walcott GP; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    Heart Rhythm; 2004 Nov; 1(5):616-23. PubMed ID: 15851229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Shock-induced epicardial and endocardial virtual electrodes leading to ventricular fibrillation via reentry, graded responses, and transmural activation.
    Evans FG; Gray RA
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2004 Jan; 15(1):79-87. PubMed ID: 15028078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Improvement of defibrillation efficacy with preshock synchronized pacing.
    Pak HN; Okuyama Y; Oh YS; Hayashi H; Liu YB; Chen PS; Lin SF
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2004 May; 15(5):581-7. PubMed ID: 15149429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effects of time to defibrillation and subthreshold preshocks on defibrillation success in pigs.
    Fujimura O; Jones DL; Klein GJ
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1989 Feb; 12(2):358-65. PubMed ID: 2468146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Termination of spiral waves with biphasic shocks: role of virtual electrode polarization.
    Anderson C; Trayanova N; Skouibine K
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2000 Dec; 11(12):1386-96. PubMed ID: 11196563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. An investigation of inter-shock timing and electrode placement for double-sequential defibrillation.
    Taylor TG; Melnick SB; Chapman FW; Walcott GP
    Resuscitation; 2019 Jul; 140():194-200. PubMed ID: 31063842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Epicardial activation after unsuccessful defibrillation shocks in dogs.
    Shibata N; Chen PS; Dixon EG; Wolf PD; Danieley ND; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    Am J Physiol; 1988 Oct; 255(4 Pt 2):H902-9. PubMed ID: 3177679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Recurrent appearance of protective zones after an unsuccessful defibrillation shock.
    Hwang C; Fan W; Chen PS
    Am J Physiol; 1996 Oct; 271(4 Pt 2):H1491-7. PubMed ID: 8897944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.