These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14732410)
1. Imaginal perspective switches in remembered environments: transformation versus interference accounts. May M Cogn Psychol; 2004 Mar; 48(2):163-206. PubMed ID: 14732410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Disentangling spatial conflicts in mental perspective taking. Puls K; May M Acta Psychol (Amst); 2020 Jun; 207():103078. PubMed ID: 32360790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Imaginal repositioning in everyday environments: effects of testing method and setting. May M Psychol Res; 2007 May; 71(3):277-87. PubMed ID: 16957955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Updating space during imagined self- and array translations. Creem-Regehr SH Mem Cognit; 2003 Sep; 31(6):941-52. PubMed ID: 14651301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Where you are affects what you can easily imagine: Environmental geometry elicits sensorimotor interference in remote perspective taking. Riecke BE; McNamara TP Cognition; 2017 Dec; 169():1-14. PubMed ID: 28802103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Imagined rotations of self versus objects: an fMRI study. Wraga M; Shephard JM; Church JA; Inati S; Kosslyn SM Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(9):1351-61. PubMed ID: 15949519 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of a body-oriented response measure on the neural substrate of imagined perspective rotations. Wraga M; Flynn CM; Boyle HK; Evans GC J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Aug; 22(8):1782-93. PubMed ID: 19642881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Access to knowledge of spatial structure at novel points of observation. Rieser JJ J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1989 Nov; 15(6):1157-65. PubMed ID: 2530309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Facilitated pointing to remembered objects in front: evidence for egocentric retrieval or for spatial priming? Kelly JW; McNamara TP Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Apr; 16(2):295-300. PubMed ID: 19293097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sex differences in components of imagined perspective transformation. Gardner MR; Sorhus I; Edmonds CJ; Potts R Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 May; 140(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 22426425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Updating displays after imagined object and viewer rotations. Wraga M; Creem SH; Proffitt DR J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2000 Jan; 26(1):151-68. PubMed ID: 10682295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The embodied nature of spatial perspective taking: embodied transformation versus sensorimotor interference. Kessler K; Thomson LA Cognition; 2010 Jan; 114(1):72-88. PubMed ID: 19782971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Asymmetric learning transfer between imagined viewer- and object-rotations: evidence of a hierarchical organization of spatial reference frames. Pellizzer G; Bâ MB; Zanello A; Merlo MC Brain Cogn; 2009 Dec; 71(3):272-8. PubMed ID: 19748718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. What's so difficult with adopting imagined perspectives? Avraamides MN; Hatzipanayioti A; Galati A Cogn Process; 2015 Sep; 16 Suppl 1():121-4. PubMed ID: 26224277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparing viewer and array mental rotations in different planes. Carpenter M; Proffitt DR Mem Cognit; 2001 Apr; 29(3):441-8. PubMed ID: 11407421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]