BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1473248)

  • 1. Detection of mammalian carcinogens with an immunological DNA synthesis-inhibition test.
    Heil J; Reifferscheid G
    Carcinogenesis; 1992 Dec; 13(12):2389-94. PubMed ID: 1473248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A core in vitro genotoxicity battery comprising the Ames test plus the in vitro micronucleus test is sufficient to detect rodent carcinogens and in vivo genotoxins.
    Kirkland D; Reeve L; Gatehouse D; Vanparys P
    Mutat Res; 2011 Mar; 721(1):27-73. PubMed ID: 21238603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Response of the ke test to NCI/NTP-screened chemicals. II. Genotoxic carcinogens and non-genotoxic non-carcinogens.
    Bakale G; McCreary RD
    Carcinogenesis; 1992 Aug; 13(8):1437-45. PubMed ID: 1499095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens II. Further analysis of mammalian cell results, relative predictivity and tumour profiles.
    Kirkland D; Aardema M; Müller L; Makoto H
    Mutat Res; 2006 Sep; 608(1):29-42. PubMed ID: 16769241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An integrated in vitro carcinogenicity test that distinguishes between genotoxic carcinogens, non-genotoxic carcinogens, and non-carcinogens.
    Chapman KE; Shah UK; Fletcher JF; Johnson GE; Doak SH; Jenkins GJS
    Mutagenesis; 2024 Mar; 39(2):69-77. PubMed ID: 38301659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Anomalous nonidentity between Salmonella genotoxicants and rodent carcinogens: nongenotoxic carcinogens and genotoxic noncarcinogens.
    Yoshikawa K
    Environ Health Perspect; 1996 Jan; 104(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 8834860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A feasibility study: Can information collected to classify for mutagenicity be informative in predicting carcinogenicity?
    Petkov PI; Patlewicz G; Schultz TW; Honma M; Todorov M; Kotov S; Dimitrov SD; Donner EM; Mekenyan OG
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2015 Jun; 72(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 25792138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How to reduce false positive results when undertaking in vitro genotoxicity testing and thus avoid unnecessary follow-up animal tests: Report of an ECVAM Workshop.
    Kirkland D; Pfuhler S; Tweats D; Aardema M; Corvi R; Darroudi F; Elhajouji A; Glatt H; Hastwell P; Hayashi M; Kasper P; Kirchner S; Lynch A; Marzin D; Maurici D; Meunier JR; Müller L; Nohynek G; Parry J; Parry E; Thybaud V; Tice R; van Benthem J; Vanparys P; White P
    Mutat Res; 2007 Mar; 628(1):31-55. PubMed ID: 17293159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An integrative test strategy for cancer hazard identification.
    Luijten M; Olthof ED; Hakkert BC; Rorije E; van der Laan JW; Woutersen RA; van Benthem J
    Crit Rev Toxicol; 2016 Aug; 46(7):615-39. PubMed ID: 27142259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The results of assays in Drosophila as indicators of exposure to carcinogens.
    Vogel EW; Graf U; Frei HJ; Nivard MM
    IARC Sci Publ; 1999; (146):427-70. PubMed ID: 10353398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A decision tree-based integrated testing strategy for tailor-made carcinogenicity evaluation of test substances using genotoxicity test results and chemical spaces.
    Fujita Y; Honda H; Yamane M; Morita T; Matsuda T; Morita O
    Mutagenesis; 2019 Mar; 34(1):101-109. PubMed ID: 30551173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens I. Sensitivity, specificity and relative predictivity.
    Kirkland D; Aardema M; Henderson L; Müller L
    Mutat Res; 2005 Jul; 584(1-2):1-256. PubMed ID: 15979392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Can in vitro mammalian cell genotoxicity test results be used to complement positive results in the Ames test and help predict carcinogenic or in vivo genotoxic activity? II. Construction and analysis of a consolidated database.
    Kirkland D; Zeiger E; Madia F; Corvi R
    Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen; 2014 Dec; 775-776():69-80. PubMed ID: 25435357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [The DNA synthesis inhibition test for detection and quantification of the carcinogenic effects of water pollutants].
    Heil J
    Schriftenr Ver Wasser Boden Lufthyg; 1992; 89():755-61. PubMed ID: 1307838
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Integrated approach to testing and assessment for predicting rodent genotoxic carcinogenicity.
    Petkov PI; Schultz TW; Donner EM; Honma M; Morita T; Hamada S; Wakata A; Mishima M; Maniwa J; Todorov M; Kaloyanova E; Kotov S; Mekenyan OG
    J Appl Toxicol; 2016 Dec; 36(12):1536-1550. PubMed ID: 27225589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Salmonella mutagenicity and rodent carcinogenicity: quantitative structure-activity relationships.
    Blake BW; Enslein K; Gombar VK; Borgstedt HH
    Mutat Res; 1990 Jul; 241(3):261-71. PubMed ID: 2195334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A novel, integrated in vitro carcinogenicity test to identify genotoxic and non-genotoxic carcinogens using human lymphoblastoid cells.
    Wilde EC; Chapman KE; Stannard LM; Seager AL; Brüsehafer K; Shah UK; Tonkin JA; Brown MR; Verma JR; Doherty AT; Johnson GE; Doak SH; Jenkins GJS
    Arch Toxicol; 2018 Feb; 92(2):935-951. PubMed ID: 29110037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Further analysis of Ames-negative rodent carcinogens that are only genotoxic in mammalian cells in vitro at concentrations exceeding 1 mM, including retesting of compounds of concern.
    Kirkland D; Fowler P
    Mutagenesis; 2010 Nov; 25(6):539-53. PubMed ID: 20720197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Failure of the standard battery of short-term tests in detecting some rodent and human genotoxic carcinogens.
    Brambilla G; Martelli A
    Toxicology; 2004 Mar; 196(1-2):1-19. PubMed ID: 15036752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In vivo Comet assay on isolated kidney cells to distinguish genotoxic carcinogens from epigenetic carcinogens or cytotoxic compounds.
    Nesslany F; Zennouche N; Simar-Meintières S; Talahari I; Nkili-Mboui EN; Marzin D
    Mutat Res; 2007 Jun; 630(1-2):28-41. PubMed ID: 17507283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.