286 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14732660)
1. Digital epiluminescence microscopy monitoring of high-risk patients.
Robinson JK; Nickoloff BJ
Arch Dermatol; 2004 Jan; 140(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 14732660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Follow-up of melanocytic skin lesions with digital epiluminescence microscopy: patterns of modifications observed in early melanoma, atypical nevi, and common nevi.
Kittler H; Pehamberger H; Wolff K; Binder M
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2000 Sep; 43(3):467-76. PubMed ID: 10954658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Incidence of new and changed nevi and melanomas detected using baseline images and dermoscopy in patients at high risk for melanoma.
Banky JP; Kelly JW; English DR; Yeatman JM; Dowling JP
Arch Dermatol; 2005 Aug; 141(8):998-1006. PubMed ID: 16103329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of digital epiluminescence microscopy to help define the edge of lentigo maligna.
Robinson JK
Arch Dermatol; 2004 Sep; 140(9):1095-100. PubMed ID: 15381550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Results from an observational trial: digital epiluminescence microscopy follow-up of atypical nevi increases the sensitivity and the chance of success of conventional dermoscopy in detecting melanoma.
Haenssle HA; Krueger U; Vente C; Thoms KM; Bertsch HP; Zutt M; Rosenberger A; Neumann C; Emmert S
J Invest Dermatol; 2006 May; 126(5):980-5. PubMed ID: 16514414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Dysplastic melanocytic nevus].
Salava A; Ranki A; Saksela O
Duodecim; 2010; 126(21):2492-501. PubMed ID: 21171474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Utility of lesion diameter in the clinical diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma.
Abbasi NR; Yancovitz M; Gutkowicz-Krusin D; Panageas KS; Mihm MC; Googe P; King R; Prieto V; Osman I; Friedman RJ; Rigel DS; Kopf AW; Polsky D
Arch Dermatol; 2008 Apr; 144(4):469-74. PubMed ID: 18427040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The "ugly duckling" sign: agreement between observers.
Scope A; Dusza SW; Halpern AC; Rabinovitz H; Braun RP; Zalaudek I; Argenziano G; Marghoob AA
Arch Dermatol; 2008 Jan; 144(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 18209169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical diagnosis of pigmented lesions using digital epiluminescence microscopy. Grading protocol and atlas.
Kenet RO; Kang S; Kenet BJ; Fitzpatrick TB; Sober AJ; Barnhill RL
Arch Dermatol; 1993 Feb; 129(2):157-74. PubMed ID: 8434973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The impact of total body photography on biopsy rate in patients from a pigmented lesion clinic.
Risser J; Pressley Z; Veledar E; Washington C; Chen SC
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2007 Sep; 57(3):428-34. PubMed ID: 17624623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Correlation of dermoscopy with in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy of streaks in melanocytic lesions.
Scope A; Gill M; Benveuto-Andrade C; Halpern AC; Gonzalez S; Marghoob AA
Arch Dermatol; 2007 Jun; 143(6):727-34. PubMed ID: 17576938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Melanomas detected with the aid of total cutaneous photography.
Feit NE; Dusza SW; Marghoob AA
Br J Dermatol; 2004 Apr; 150(4):706-14. PubMed ID: 15099367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Selection of patients for long-term surveillance with digital dermoscopy by assessment of melanoma risk factors.
Haenssle HA; Korpas B; Hansen-Hagge C; Buhl T; Kaune KM; Johnsen S; Rosenberger A; Schön MP; Emmert S
Arch Dermatol; 2010 Mar; 146(3):257-64. PubMed ID: 20231495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of the optimal interval for and sensitivity of short-term sequential digital dermoscopy monitoring for the diagnosis of melanoma.
Altamura D; Avramidis M; Menzies SW
Arch Dermatol; 2008 Apr; 144(4):502-6. PubMed ID: 18427044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Microscopic in vivo description of cellular architecture of dermoscopic pigment network in nevi and melanomas.
Pellacani G; Cesinaro AM; Longo C; Grana C; Seidenari S
Arch Dermatol; 2005 Feb; 141(2):147-54. PubMed ID: 15724010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Significance of dermoscopic patterns in detecting malignant melanoma on acral volar skin: results of a multicenter study in Japan.
Saida T; Miyazaki A; Oguchi S; Ishihara Y; Yamazaki Y; Murase S; Yoshikawa S; Tsuchida T; Kawabata Y; Tamaki K
Arch Dermatol; 2004 Oct; 140(10):1233-8. PubMed ID: 15492186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The diagnostic performance of expert dermoscopists vs a computer-vision system on small-diameter melanomas.
Friedman RJ; Gutkowicz-Krusin D; Farber MJ; Warycha M; Schneider-Kels L; Papastathis N; Mihm MC; Googe P; King R; Prieto VG; Kopf AW; Polsky D; Rabinovitz H; Oliviero M; Cognetta A; Rigel DS; Marghoob A; Rivers J; Johr R; Grant-Kels JM; Tsao H
Arch Dermatol; 2008 Apr; 144(4):476-82. PubMed ID: 18427041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Automatic differentiation of melanoma from melanocytic nevi with multispectral digital dermoscopy: a feasibility study.
Elbaum M; Kopf AW; Rabinovitz HS; Langley RG; Kamino H; Mihm MC; Sober AJ; Peck GL; Bogdan A; Gutkowicz-Krusin D; Greenebaum M; Keem S; Oliviero M; Wang S
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2001 Feb; 44(2):207-18. PubMed ID: 11174377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Supply-and-demand discrepancy in academic pigmented lesion clinics: a case for a new health care delivery model.
Vickery EL; Seidler EM; Jones TE; Veledar E; Chen SC
JAMA Dermatol; 2014 Nov; 150(11):1167-72. PubMed ID: 25028988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Simulators of malignant melanoma of the skin.
Cerroni L; Kerl H
Eur J Dermatol; 1998 Sep; 8(6):388-96. PubMed ID: 9729049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
