237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14732910)
1. [Oscillometric wrist devices: comparison with the standard mercury sphygmomanometer and estimate of the "supine" error].
Caridi G; Zoccali C; Enia G
G Ital Nefrol; 2003; 20(6):589-91. PubMed ID: 14732910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Both body and arm position significantly influence blood pressure measurement.
Netea RT; Lenders JW; Smits P; Thien T
J Hum Hypertens; 2003 Jul; 17(7):459-62. PubMed ID: 12821952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Arm position and blood pressure: a risk factor for hypertension?
Mourad A; Carney S; Gillies A; Jones B; Nanra R; Trevillian P
J Hum Hypertens; 2003 Jun; 17(6):389-95. PubMed ID: 12764401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validation of the Samsung SBM-100A and Microlife BP 3BU1-5 wrist blood pressure measuring devices in adults according to the International Protocol.
Altunkan S; Ilman N; Altunkan E
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Apr; 12(2):119-25. PubMed ID: 17353656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validation of three oscillometric blood pressure devices against auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in children.
Wong SN; Tz Sung RY; Leung LC
Blood Press Monit; 2006 Oct; 11(5):281-91. PubMed ID: 16932037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of oscillometric blood pressure measurements at the wrist with an upper-arm auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer.
Rogers P; Burke V; Stroud P; Puddey IB
Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol; 1999; 26(5-6):477-81. PubMed ID: 10386242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Comparison of invasive blood pressure measurement in the aorta with indirect oscillometric blood pressure measurement at the wrist and forearm].
Saul F; Aristidou Y; Klaus D; Wiemeyer A; Lösse B
Z Kardiol; 1995 Sep; 84(9):675-85. PubMed ID: 8525669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation of the Braun BP 3550 wrist blood pressure measuring device with a position sensor and an EasyClick cuff according to the International Protocol in adults.
Ilman N; Altunkan S; Kayatürk N; Altunkan E
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Feb; 12(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 17303987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Dinamap PRO-100 and mercury sphygmomanometer blood pressure measurements in a population-based study.
Ni H; Wu C; Prineas R; Shea S; Liu K; Kronmal R; Bild D
Am J Hypertens; 2006 Apr; 19(4):353-60. PubMed ID: 16580569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Replacing the mercury manometer with an oscillometric device in a hypertension clinic: implications for clinical decision making.
Stergiou GS; Lourida P; Tzamouranis D
J Hum Hypertens; 2011 Nov; 25(11):692-8. PubMed ID: 21107434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of two sphygmomanometers that may replace the traditional mercury column in the healthcare workplace.
Elliott WJ; Young PE; DeVivo L; Feldstein J; Black HR
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Feb; 12(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 17303984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical validation of an automatic device measuring blood pressure in the fingers.
Arosio E; Zannoni M
Panminerva Med; 1999 Jun; 41(2):143-8. PubMed ID: 10479914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of an oscillometric device for monitoring blood pressure in dialysis patients.
Lodi CA; Estridge C; Ghidini C
Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2007 Oct; 22(10):2950-61. PubMed ID: 17556423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Brachial or wrist blood pressure in obese patients: which is the best?
de Senarclens O; Feihl F; Giusti V; Engelberger RP; Rodieux F; Gomez P; Liaudet L; Waeber B
Blood Press Monit; 2008 Jun; 13(3):149-51. PubMed ID: 18496290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validation of two automatic devices for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension: the Omron M6 (HEM-7001-E) and the Omron R7 (HEM 637-IT).
Topouchian JA; El Assaad MA; Orobinskaia LV; El Feghali RN; Asmar RG
Blood Press Monit; 2006 Jun; 11(3):165-71. PubMed ID: 16702826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Comparison between brachial blood pressures obtained by aneroid sphygmomanometer and central aortic pressures: factors affecting the measurements].
Kayrak M; Ulgen MS; Yazici M; Demir K; Doğan Y; Koç F; Zengin K; Ari H
Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars; 2008 Jun; 36(4):239-46. PubMed ID: 18765967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validation of the Omron M6 (HEM-7001-E) upper-arm blood pressure measuring device according to the International Protocol in adults and obese adults.
Altunkan S; Ilman N; Kayatürk N; Altunkan E
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Aug; 12(4):219-25. PubMed ID: 17625394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validation of the Omron 637IT wrist blood pressure measuring device with a position sensor according to the International Protocol in adults and obese adults.
Altunkan S; Oztaş K; Altunkan E
Blood Press Monit; 2006 Apr; 11(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 16534409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The impact of pulse pressure on the accuracy of wrist blood pressure measurement.
Westhoff TH; Schmidt S; Meissner R; Zidek W; van der Giet M
J Hum Hypertens; 2009 Jun; 23(6):391-5. PubMed ID: 19092843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Lack of sphygmomanometer calibration causes over- and under-detection of hypertension: a computer simulation study.
Turner MJ; Irwig L; Bune AJ; Kam PC; Baker AB
J Hypertens; 2006 Oct; 24(10):1931-8. PubMed ID: 16957551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
