These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

280 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14732915)

  • 1. [Critical appraisal of systematic reviews of randomised trials in nephrology: theory and practice for interpreting level I evidence].
    Strippoli GF; Manno C; Schena FP
    G Ital Nefrol; 2003; 20(6):615-24. PubMed ID: 14732915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management, part I: introduction and general considerations.
    Manchikanti L
    Pain Physician; 2008; 11(2):161-86. PubMed ID: 18354710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Dec; 133 Suppl 7():S225-46. PubMed ID: 19034813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The usefulness of Cochrane systematic reviews in nephrology].
    Di Micco L; Manno C; Cianciaruso B; Strippoli G
    G Ital Nefrol; 2009; 26(1):38-54. PubMed ID: 19255963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [How to produce systematic reviews of excellent quality and to define evidence-based nephrology].
    Darnand K; Fouque D
    Nephrologie; 2000; 21(2):71-4. PubMed ID: 10798207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A method for defining a journal subset for a clinical discipline using the bibliographies of systematic reviews.
    Wilczynski NL; Garg AX; Haynes B;
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2007; 129(Pt 1):721-4. PubMed ID: 17911811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How to use a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.
    Tseng TY; Dahm P; Poolman RW; Preminger GM; Canales BJ; Montori VM
    J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4):1249-56. PubMed ID: 18707741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Methodologic issues in systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Montori VM; Swiontkowski MF; Cook DJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 Aug; (413):43-54. PubMed ID: 12897595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses: an illustrated, step-by-step guide.
    Pai M; McCulloch M; Gorman JD; Pai N; Enanoria W; Kennedy G; Tharyan P; Colford JM
    Natl Med J India; 2004; 17(2):86-95. PubMed ID: 15141602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [The Italian Society of Nephrology Guidelines (3rd Edition): principles and methods].
    Manno C; Strippoli GF; Cianciaruso B; Cagnoli L; Cancarini G; Messa P; Segoloni GP; Stratta P; Triolo G; Schena FP;
    G Ital Nefrol; 2006; 23(2):173-81. PubMed ID: 16710822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Systematic reviews and meta-analysis in laboratory medicine: principles and methods].
    Watine J
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2004; 62(6):611-27. PubMed ID: 15563420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evidence summaries and synthesis: necessary but insufficient approach for determining clinical practice of integrated medicine?
    Coulter ID
    Integr Cancer Ther; 2006 Dec; 5(4):282-6. PubMed ID: 17101756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reducing obesity and related chronic disease risk in children and youth: a synthesis of evidence with 'best practice' recommendations.
    Flynn MA; McNeil DA; Maloff B; Mutasingwa D; Wu M; Ford C; Tough SC
    Obes Rev; 2006 Feb; 7 Suppl 1():7-66. PubMed ID: 16371076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The quality of reports of critical care meta-analyses in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: an independent appraisal.
    Delaney A; Bagshaw SM; Ferland A; Laupland K; Manns B; Doig C
    Crit Care Med; 2007 Feb; 35(2):589-94. PubMed ID: 17205029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Systematic reviews--triumph of form over substance?
    Thomas L; Wilson JA
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2006 Dec; 31(6):492-5. PubMed ID: 17184452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An analysis of systematic reviews indicated low incorpororation of results from clinical trial quality assessment.
    de Craen AJ; van Vliet HA; Helmerhorst FM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Mar; 58(3):311-3. PubMed ID: 15718121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Producing systematic reviews of best quality: a prerequisite for evidence-based nephrology.
    Fouque D
    J Nephrol; 1999; 12(5):314-7. PubMed ID: 10630695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A scoring system for appraising mixed methods research, and concomitantly appraising qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods primary studies in Mixed Studies Reviews.
    Pluye P; Gagnon MP; Griffiths F; Johnson-Lafleur J
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2009 Apr; 46(4):529-46. PubMed ID: 19233357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.