These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14732959)

  • 1. [Determination of absorbed dose to water for high energy photon and electron beams--comparison of different dosimetry protocols].
    Zakaria GA; Schütte W
    Z Med Phys; 2003; 13(4):281-9. PubMed ID: 14732959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of the IAEA TRS-398 and AAPM TG-51 absorbed dose to water protocols in the dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams.
    Huq MS; Andreo P; Song H
    Phys Med Biol; 2001 Nov; 46(11):2985-3006. PubMed ID: 11720359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Determination of absorbed dose to water for high-energy photon and electron beams-comparison of the standards DIN 6800-2 (1997), IAEA TRS 398 (2000) and DIN 6800-2 (2006).
    Zakaria GA; Schuette W
    J Med Phys; 2007 Jan; 32(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 21217912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Calculated absorbed-dose ratios, TG51/TG21, for most widely used cylindrical and parallel-plate ion chambers over a range of photon and electron energies.
    Tailor RC; Hanson WF
    Med Phys; 2002 Jul; 29(7):1464-72. PubMed ID: 12148727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Protocols for the dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams: a comparison of the IAEA TRS-398 and previous international codes of practice. International Atomic Energy Agency.
    Andreo P; Huq MS; Westermark M; Song H; Tilikidis A; DeWerd L; Shortt K
    Phys Med Biol; 2002 Sep; 47(17):3033-53. PubMed ID: 12361209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reference Dosimetry according to the New German Protocol DIN 6800-2 and Comparison with IAEA TRS 398 and AAPM TG 51.
    Zakaria A; Schuette W; Younan C
    Biomed Imaging Interv J; 2011 Apr; 7(2):e15. PubMed ID: 22287987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reference dosimetry in clinical high-energy electron beams: comparison of the AAPM TG-51 and AAPM TG-21 dosimetry protocols.
    Saiful Huq M; Song H; Andreo P; Houser CJ
    Med Phys; 2001 Oct; 28(10):2077-87. PubMed ID: 11695769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of high-energy photon and electron dosimetry for various dosimetry protocols.
    Araki F; Kubo HD
    Med Phys; 2002 May; 29(5):857-68. PubMed ID: 12033582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reference dose determination in 60Co and high-energy radiotherapy photon beams by using Farmer-type cylindrical ionization chambers - an experimental investigation.
    Swanpalmer J
    Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2020 May; 6(4):045003. PubMed ID: 33444264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A dosimetry study comparing NCS report-5, IAEA TRS-381, AAPM TG-51 and IAEA TRS-398 in three clinical electron beam energies.
    Palmans H; Nafaa L; de Patoul N; Denis JM; Tomsej M; Vynckier S
    Phys Med Biol; 2003 May; 48(9):1091-107. PubMed ID: 12765324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Determination of absorbed dose for photon and electron beams from a linear accelerator by comparing various protocols on different phantoms.
    Banjade DP; Tajuddin AA; Shukri A
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2001 Aug; 55(2):235-43. PubMed ID: 11393765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reference dosimetry in clinical high-energy photon beams: comparison of the AAPM TG-51 and AAPM TG-21 dosimetry protocols.
    Saiful Huq M; Andreo P
    Med Phys; 2001 Jan; 28(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 11213922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Calibration of high-energy photon and electron beams for radiotherapy using AAPM 1983 and IAEA 1987 dosimetry protocols.
    Huq MS; Agostinelli AG; Nath R
    Med Phys; 1993; 20(2 Pt 1):293-8. PubMed ID: 8497213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. AAPM's TG-51 protocol for clinical reference dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams.
    Almond PR; Biggs PJ; Coursey BM; Hanson WF; Huq MS; Nath R; Rogers DW
    Med Phys; 1999 Sep; 26(9):1847-70. PubMed ID: 10505874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of the AAPM "Protocol for the determination of absorbed dose from high-energy photon and electron beams" with currently used protocols.
    Hunt MA; Malik S; Thomason C; Masterson ME
    Med Phys; 1984; 11(6):806-13. PubMed ID: 6439991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of IAEA 1987 and AAPM 1983 protocols for dosimetry calibration of radiotherapy beams.
    Huq MS; Nath R
    Med Phys; 1991; 18(1):26-35. PubMed ID: 1901129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Absorbed dose to water based dosimetry versus air kerma based dosimetry for high-energy photon beams: an experimental study.
    Palmans H; Nafaa L; De JJ; Gillis S; Hoornaert MT; Martens C; Piessens M; Thierens H; Van der Plaetsen A; Vynckier S
    Phys Med Biol; 2002 Feb; 47(3):421-40. PubMed ID: 11848121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Absorbed dose determination for high energy photon and electron beams at a PRIMUS linear accelerator using the documents DIN 6800-2 and TRS-398.
    Hartmann GH
    Z Med Phys; 2003; 13(4):241-50. PubMed ID: 14732953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison between TG-51 and TG-21: Calibration of photon and electron beams in water using cylindrical chambers.
    Cho SH; Lowenstein JR; Balter PA; Wells NH; Hanson WF
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2000; 1(3):108-15. PubMed ID: 11674825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ionization chamber dosimetry of proton beams using cylindrical and plane parallel chambers. Nw versus Nk ion chamber calibrations.
    Medin J; Andreo P; Grusell E; Mattsson O; Montelius A; Roos M
    Phys Med Biol; 1995 Jul; 40(7):1161-76. PubMed ID: 7568375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.