These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14733043)
21. Exploring the legal status of healthcare documentation in the UK. Dimond B Br J Nurs; 2005 May 12-25; 14(9):517-8. PubMed ID: 15924003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Quality assurance activities and the impact of the Quality of Care Information Protection Act, 2004. Boudreau J Health Law Can; 2005 Mar; 25(3):45-51. PubMed ID: 15844628 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Lawful disclosure of confidential information. Dimond B Br J Nurs; 2005 Oct 13-26; 14(18):984-5. PubMed ID: 16237355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Access by patients to the clinical record. Malcolmson S Health Law Can; 1992; 13(2):160-1. PubMed ID: 10126146 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Patient privacy in the COVID-19 era: Data access, transparency, rights, regulation and the case for retaining the status quo. Henderson J Health Inf Manag; 2021; 50(1-2):6-8. PubMed ID: 33176491 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Practice brief. Redisclosure of patient health information (updated). American Health Information Management Association J AHIMA; 2003 Apr; 74(4):56A-56C. PubMed ID: 12698943 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. The application and scope of the proposed new law. Cavoukian A Health Law Can; 1992; 13(2):153-5. PubMed ID: 10126144 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Moral reconstruction in the hospital: a legal and philosophical perspective on patient rights. Dougherty CJ; Dougherty SL Creighton Law Rev; 1980 Suppl ): 1409-1434, 1980; 14(4):. PubMed ID: 11665272 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Trial will test privacy rules for health files. Francis T Wall St J (East Ed); 2003 Dec; ():B1, B11. PubMed ID: 14971382 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. [When the violation of medical confidentiality is imposed by law: Another side effect of Law N° 20.584]. Vega J; Quintana MS Rev Med Chil; 2016 Feb; 144(2):253-6. PubMed ID: 27092681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Confidence matters: the rise and fall of informational autonomy in medical law. Case P Med Law Rev; 2003; 11(2):208-36. PubMed ID: 15085818 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Rights to information access under the Data Protection Act. Dimond B Br J Nurs; 2005 Jul 28-Aug 10; 14(14):774-6. PubMed ID: 16116383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Banking on confidentiality: should consumers be allowed access to the National Practitioner Data Bank? Schendel NJ J Health Hosp Law; 1994 Oct; 27(10):289-305. PubMed ID: 10137985 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Doubling the guard: ethics and law at the privacy gate. Blake MB J Clin Ethics; 2002; 13(4):310-5. PubMed ID: 12793323 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Implementation of the Cross-border Care Directive in EU Member States: Luxembourg. Schwebag M Eur J Health Law; 2014 Mar; 21(1):56-64. PubMed ID: 24665671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Importance and limits of medical confidentiality. Hoffman BF Health Law Can; 1997 Feb; 17(3):93-5. PubMed ID: 10165697 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. [Informing the surgical patient. Reflections on the basic law of patient autonomy]. Acea B Cir Esp; 2005 Feb; 77(2):60-4. PubMed ID: 16420888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Practice brief. Consent for the use or disclosure of individually identifiable health information. Hughes G; J AHIMA; 2001 May; 72(5):suppl 64E-64G. PubMed ID: 12793262 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]