160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14733044)
1. Human assisted procreation and human rights--the Greek response to the felt necessities of the time.
Kriari-Catranis I
Eur J Health Law; 2003 Sep; 10(3):271-80. PubMed ID: 14733044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Health, human rights and the regulation of reproductive technologies in S.H. And others V Austria (application no. 57813/00).
McGuinness S
Med Law Rev; 2013; 21(1):146-60. PubMed ID: 23420774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reproductive rights in Hungarian law: a new right to assisted procreation?
Sándor J
Health Hum Rights; 2000; 4(2):196-218. PubMed ID: 10796975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Privacy and the regulation of the new reproductive technologies: a decision-making approach.
Sedillo Lopez A
Fam Law Q; 1988; 22(2):173-97. PubMed ID: 16100818
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Regulating a revolution: the extent of reproductive rights in Canada.
Washenfelder C
Health Law Rev; 2003; 12(2):44-52. PubMed ID: 15742499
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Italian law on medically assisted reproduction: do women's autonomy and health matter?
Riezzo I; Neri M; Bello S; Pomara C; Turillazzi E
BMC Womens Health; 2016 Jul; 16():44. PubMed ID: 27449932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Medically-assisted procreation in Italy.
Conti A; Delbon P
Med Law; 2005 Mar; 24(1):163-72. PubMed ID: 15887620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Advances in Medically-assisted procreation technologies: can malpractice claims and "reproductive damage" be identified.
Negro F; Varone MC; Del Rio A
Clin Ter; 2020; 171(3):e225-e228. PubMed ID: 32323709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The regulation of assisted reproductive technology: a comparative study of permissive and prescriptive laws and policies.
Petersen K
J Law Med; 2002 May; 9(4):483-97. PubMed ID: 12194479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is there anything left of the Italian law governing medically-assisted procreation?
Negro F; Marinelli S
Clin Ter; 2021; 171(1):e57-e59. PubMed ID: 33346329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The law of February 19th 2004, No. 40: procreation and punishment.
Canestrari S
Rev Derecho Genoma Hum; 2005; (22):57-73. PubMed ID: 16385790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Attitudes of fertile and infertile woman towards new reproductive technologies: a case study of Lithuania.
Blaževičienė A; Jakušovaitė I; Vaškelytė A
Reprod Health; 2014 Apr; 11():26. PubMed ID: 24684746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Debate in embryo donation: embryo donation or both-gamete donation?
Samani RO; Moalem MR; Merghati ST; Alizadeh L
Reprod Biomed Online; 2009; 19 Suppl 1():29-33. PubMed ID: 19622248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A human right to reproduce non-coitally? A comment on the Austrian Constitutional Court's judgment of 14 October 1999.
Bernat E
Univ Tasman Law Rev; 2002; 21(1):20-38. PubMed ID: 15214357
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Access to in vitro fertilization deserves increased regulation in the United States.
Murphy JB
J Sex Marital Ther; 2013; 39(2):85-92. PubMed ID: 23252634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Medically assisted procreation and the right to found a family.
Mazars C
Hum Reprod Genet Ethics; 2004; 10(1):40-2. PubMed ID: 15459992
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Human rights and procreation].
Leroy F
Rev Med Brux; 1990 May; 11(5):135-41. PubMed ID: 2191405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Japanese attitudes toward assisted procreation.
Shirai Y
J Law Med Ethics; 1993; 21(1):43-53. PubMed ID: 11652121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [MAR: current and future practices with the review of the law on bioethics].
Keromnès G
Soins Pediatr Pueric; 2019 Nov; 40(311):12-17. PubMed ID: 31757269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Infertility, assisted reproduction and rights.
Chan CC; Ho PC
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2006 Jun; 20(3):369-80. PubMed ID: 16503202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
