160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14733044)
21. The Human Rights Act 1998--legal implications for those engaged in infertility services.
Maunder J
Hum Fertil (Camb); 2004 Mar; 7(1):5-9. PubMed ID: 16192077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Attitudes of Italian Infertile Women Toward Ethical and Regulatory Limits of Medically Assisted Procreation (MAP).
Cioffi A; Cecannecchia C; Santurro A; Cipolloni L; Cioffi F
Clin Ter; 2023; 174(3):251-256. PubMed ID: 37199360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Suicide and homosexual procreation: why "medicalize"?].
Nau JY
Rev Med Suisse; 2012 Nov; 8(364):2306-7. PubMed ID: 23240248
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Reproductive technologies and United States law.
Vetri D
Int Comp Law Q; 1988 Jul; 37():505-34. PubMed ID: 16032817
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Prisoners of progress or hostages to fortune?
Morgan D; Nielsen L
J Law Med Ethics; 1993; 21(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 11652120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The consequences of S.H. and Others v. Austria for legislation on gamete donation in Europe: an ethical analysis of the European Court of Human Rights judgments.
Van Hoof W; Pennings G
Reprod Biomed Online; 2012 Dec; 25(7):665-9. PubMed ID: 23063819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Evolution of assisted reproductive technologies].
Jouannet P
Bull Acad Natl Med; 2009 Mar; 193(3):573-82. PubMed ID: 19883012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Assisted human reproduction--legal rights of the unborn in respect of avoidable damage.
Adam GM
Med Law; 2007 Jun; 26(2):325-37. PubMed ID: 17639854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Italy enacts new law on medically assisted reproduction.
Boggio A
Hum Reprod; 2005 May; 20(5):1153-7. PubMed ID: 15790606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Medically assisted procreation: legal analysis and precepts].
Knoppers BM
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1992; 21(3):331-2. PubMed ID: 1351083
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. The process of justifying assisted reproductive technologies in Iran.
Gooshki ES; Allahbedashti N
Indian J Med Ethics; 2015; 12(2):57-96. PubMed ID: 25920968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A new approach to sex-based classifications in the context of procreative rights: S.H. & Others V. Austria in context.
Sanderson M
Eur J Health Law; 2013 Mar; 20(1):21-40. PubMed ID: 23544315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Gender and parenthood: the case for realignment.
McGuinness S; Alghrani A
Med Law Rev; 2008; 16(2):261-83. PubMed ID: 18441087
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Assisted reproduction--Islamic views on the science of procreation.
Ahmad NH
Eubios J Asian Int Bioeth; 2003 Mar; 13(2):59-61. PubMed ID: 17117542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Ethical and legal issues in human embryo donation.
Robertson JA
Fertil Steril; 1995 Nov; 64(5):885-94. PubMed ID: 7589629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Heterologous Fertilization: the Opinion of Italian Physicians and a Brief European Overview.
Zaami S; Busardò FP; Santurro A; Di Sanzo M; Agostini S; Baglio G; Frati P
Curr Pharm Biotechnol; 2016; 17(4):342-6. PubMed ID: 26718923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Assisted reproduction and mental illness: a human rights perspective from New Zealand.
Fancourt N
J Law Med; 2010 Sep; 18(1):124-9. PubMed ID: 20977166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [The infra-value of human rights in the context of assisted regulation in México].
Esparza-Pérez RV
Gac Med Mex; 2017; 153(5):626-632. PubMed ID: 29099116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Human rights and reproductive choices in the case-law of Italian and European courts.
Valongo A
Eur J Health Law; 2014 Apr; 21(2):123-40. PubMed ID: 24851649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The Report of the Warnock Committee on Human Fertilisation and Embryology.
Priest JA
Mod Law Rev; 1985 Jan; 48(1):73-85. PubMed ID: 16100813
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
