These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
42. The problem with advance directives: maybe it is the medium, not the message. Moseley R; Dobalian A; Hatch R Arch Gerontol Geriatr; 2005; 41(2):211-9. PubMed ID: 15899529 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Medical: advance health care planning. Final rule. Department of Veterans Affairs Fed Regist; 2005 Nov; 70(229):71772-4. PubMed ID: 16317815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Hypothetical autonomy and actual autonomy: some problem cases involving advance directives. Wreen MJ J Clin Ethics; 2004; 15(4):319-33. PubMed ID: 15830561 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. The health care agent: protecting the choices and interests of patients who lack capacity. Swidler RN N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 1988; 6(1):1-61. PubMed ID: 16998980 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Advance directives and proxies' predictions about patients' treatment preferences. Barrio-Cantalejo IM; Molina-Ruiz A; Simón-Lorda P; Cámara-Medina C; Toral López I; del Mar Rodríguez del Aguila M; Bailón-Gómez RM Nurs Ethics; 2009 Jan; 16(1):93-109. PubMed ID: 19103694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Respecting end-of-life treatment preferences. Crane MK; Wittink M; Doukas DJ Am Fam Physician; 2005 Oct; 72(7):1263-8. PubMed ID: 16225029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Legislating advance directives for the terminally ill: the living will and durable power of attorney. Martyn SR; Jacobs LB Neb Law Rev; 1984; 63(4):779-809. PubMed ID: 16041874 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Ethics update: lessons learned from Terri Schiavo: the importance of healthcare proxies in clinical decision-making. Cohen NH; Kummer HB Curr Opin Anaesthesiol; 2006 Apr; 19(2):122-6. PubMed ID: 16552217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Essentials of hospice: what every Oklahoma physician needs to know, Part II. Winn P; Salinas R J Okla State Med Assoc; 2005 Jan; 98(1):9-11. PubMed ID: 15729991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Deferred proxy consent in emergency critical care research: ethically valid and practically feasible. Jansen TC; Kompanje EJ; Bakker J Crit Care Med; 2009 Jan; 37(1 Suppl):S65-8. PubMed ID: 19104227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Advance directives and living wills. Palazzani L NeuroRehabilitation; 2004; 19(4):305-13. PubMed ID: 15671585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. A pilot study on the utility of a more informative living will. DePriest JL; Cox P; Bryant A W V Med J; 2014; 110(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 24640271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. [What (abdominal) surgeons must know about aspects of autonomic decisions with respect to self-determination, advance healthcare directives and suicide]. Simon A; Meyer F Chirurg; 2022 Feb; 93(2):152-157. PubMed ID: 34297150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. [Characteristics and aims of patient advance directive laws]. Kletecka-Pulker M Bull Soc Sci Med Grand Duche Luxemb; 2008; (3):289-97. PubMed ID: 19069727 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Autonomy and the family as (in)appropriate surrogates for DNR decisions: a qualitative analysis of dying cancer patients' talk. Eliott J; Olver I J Clin Ethics; 2007; 18(3):206-18. PubMed ID: 18051937 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]