These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14734563)

  • 21. Probing the interaction mechanisms between transmembrane peptides and the chaperonin GroEL with fluorescence anisotropy.
    Wang X; Chen H; Lu X; Chi H; Li S; Huang F
    Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc; 2018 Apr; 194():1-7. PubMed ID: 29304433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. An expanded protein folding cage in the GroEL-gp31 complex.
    Clare DK; Bakkes PJ; van Heerikhuizen H; van der Vies SM; Saibil HR
    J Mol Biol; 2006 May; 358(3):905-11. PubMed ID: 16549073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Synchronized domain-opening motion of GroEL is essential for communication between the two rings.
    Shiseki K; Murai N; Motojima F; Hisabori T; Yoshida M; Taguchi H
    J Biol Chem; 2001 Apr; 276(14):11335-8. PubMed ID: 11139586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Annealing function of GroEL: structural and bioinformatic analysis.
    Stan G; Thirumalai D; Lorimer GH; Brooks BR
    Biophys Chem; 2003; 100(1-3):453-67. PubMed ID: 12646383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Chaperonin-Assisted Protein Folding: Relative Population of Asymmetric and Symmetric GroEL:GroES Complexes.
    Haldar S; Gupta AJ; Yan X; Miličić G; Hartl FU; Hayer-Hartl M
    J Mol Biol; 2015 Jun; 427(12):2244-55. PubMed ID: 25912285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Differential conformational modulations of MreB folding upon interactions with GroEL/ES and TRiC chaperonin components.
    Moparthi SB; Carlsson U; Vincentelli R; Jonsson BH; Hammarström P; Wenger J
    Sci Rep; 2016 Jun; 6():28386. PubMed ID: 27328749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Creating the Functional Single-Ring GroEL-GroES Chaperonin Systems via Modulating GroEL-GroES Interaction.
    Illingworth M; Ellis H; Chen L
    Sci Rep; 2017 Aug; 7(1):9710. PubMed ID: 28852160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Exploring the structural dynamics of the E.coli chaperonin GroEL using translation-libration-screw crystallographic refinement of intermediate states.
    Chaudhry C; Horwich AL; Brunger AT; Adams PD
    J Mol Biol; 2004 Sep; 342(1):229-45. PubMed ID: 15313620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Fast-scanning atomic force microscopy reveals the ATP/ADP-dependent conformational changes of GroEL.
    Yokokawa M; Wada C; Ando T; Sakai N; Yagi A; Yoshimura SH; Takeyasu K
    EMBO J; 2006 Oct; 25(19):4567-76. PubMed ID: 16977315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Conformational variability in the refined structure of the chaperonin GroEL at 2.8 A resolution.
    Braig K; Adams PD; Brünger AT
    Nat Struct Biol; 1995 Dec; 2(12):1083-94. PubMed ID: 8846220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Structural changes of the Escherichia coli GroEL-GroES chaperonins upon complex formation in solution: a neutron small angle scattering study.
    Stegmann R; Manakova E; Rössle M; Heumann H; Nieba-Axmann SE; Plückthun A; Hermann T; May RP; Wiedenmann A
    J Struct Biol; 1998 Jan; 121(1):30-40. PubMed ID: 9573618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A dynamic model of long-range conformational adaptations triggered by nucleotide binding in GroEL-GroES.
    Skjaerven L; Muga A; Reuter N; Martinez A
    Proteins; 2012 Oct; 80(10):2333-46. PubMed ID: 22576372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The binding of bis-ANS to the isolated GroEL apical domain fragment induces the formation of a folding intermediate with increased hydrophobic surface not observed in tetradecameric GroEL.
    Smoot AL; Panda M; Brazil BT; Buckle AM; Fersht AR; Horowitz PM
    Biochemistry; 2001 Apr; 40(14):4484-92. PubMed ID: 11284705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Distinct actions of cis and trans ATP within the double ring of the chaperonin GroEL.
    Rye HS; Burston SG; Fenton WA; Beechem JM; Xu Z; Sigler PB; Horwich AL
    Nature; 1997 Aug; 388(6644):792-8. PubMed ID: 9285593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Factors governing the substrate recognition by GroEL chaperone: a sequence correlation approach.
    Chaudhuri TK; Gupta P
    Cell Stress Chaperones; 2005; 10(1):24-36. PubMed ID: 15832945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Dissociation of the GroEL-GroES asymmetric complex is accelerated by increased cooperativity in ATP binding to the GroEL ring distal to GroES.
    Fridmann Y; Kafri G; Danziger O; Horovitz A
    Biochemistry; 2002 May; 41(18):5938-44. PubMed ID: 11980498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Hydrophilic residues at the apical domain of GroEL contribute to GroES binding but attenuate polypeptide binding.
    Motojima F; Makio T; Aoki K; Makino Y; Kuwajima K; Yoshida M
    Biochem Biophys Res Commun; 2000 Jan; 267(3):842-9. PubMed ID: 10673379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Role of the GroEL chaperonin intermediate domain in coupling ATP hydrolysis to polypeptide release.
    Martin J
    J Biol Chem; 1998 Mar; 273(13):7351-7. PubMed ID: 9516431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. From minichaperone to GroEL 2: importance of avidity of the multisite ring structure.
    Chatellier J; Hill F; Fersht AR
    J Mol Biol; 2000 Dec; 304(5):883-96. PubMed ID: 11124034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Intrinsic fluorescence studies of the chaperonin GroEL containing single Tyr --> Trp replacements reveal ligand-induced conformational changes.
    Gibbons DL; Hixson JD; Hay N; Lund P; Gorovits BM; Ybarra J; Horowitz PM
    J Biol Chem; 1996 Dec; 271(50):31989-95. PubMed ID: 8943246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.