BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14735016)

  • 1. Actual role of unenhanced magnetic resonance angiography (mra tof 3d) in the study of stenosis and occlusion of extracranial carotid artery.
    Scarabino T; Fossaceca R; Carra L; Florio F; Marano G; Carriero A
    Radiol Med; 2003; 106(5-6):497-503. PubMed ID: 14735016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Noninvasive detection of steno-occlusive disease of the supra-aortic arteries with three-dimensional contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography: a prospective, intra-individual comparative analysis with digital subtraction angiography.
    Willinek WA; von Falkenhausen M; Born M; Gieseke J; Höller T; Klockgether T; Textor HJ; Schild HH; Urbach H
    Stroke; 2005 Jan; 36(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 15569881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Carotid artery stenosis: contrast-enhanced MR angiography with two different scan times compared with digital subtraction angiography.
    Sundgren PC; Sundén P; Lindgren A; Lanke J; Holtås S; Larsson EM
    Neuroradiology; 2002 Jul; 44(7):592-9. PubMed ID: 12136361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy and utility of three-dimensional contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in planning carotid stenting.
    Timaran CH; Rosero EB; Valentine RJ; Modrall JG; Smith S; Clagett GP
    J Vasc Surg; 2007 Aug; 46(2):257-63; discussion 263-4. PubMed ID: 17600659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Doppler ultrasound and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in assessing carotid artery stenosis.
    D'Onofrio M; Mansueto G; Faccioli N; Guarise A; Tamellini P; Bogina G; Pozzi Mucelli R
    Radiol Med; 2006 Feb; 111(1):93-103. PubMed ID: 16623309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of apparent internal carotid occlusion on ultrasound: prospective comparison of contrast-enhanced ultrasound, magnetic resonance angiography and digital subtraction angiography.
    Hammond CJ; McPherson SJ; Patel JV; Gough MJ
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2008 Apr; 35(4):405-12. PubMed ID: 18262445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Efficacy of patient selection strategies for carotid endarterectomy by contrast-enhanced MRA on a 1 T machine and duplex ultrasound in a regional hospital.
    Korteweg MA; Kerkhoff H; Bakker J; Elgersma OE
    Clin Radiol; 2008 Feb; 63(2):174-83. PubMed ID: 18194694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Overestimation of carotid artery stenosis with magnetic resonance angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography.
    Nederkoorn PJ; Elgersma OE; Mali WP; Eikelboom BC; Kappelle LJ; van der Graaf Y
    J Vasc Surg; 2002 Oct; 36(4):806-13. PubMed ID: 12368742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography of the carotid artery at 1.0 Tesla compared to i.a. DSA: is the method suitable for the diagnosis of carotid stenosis?].
    Oberholzer K; Kreitner KF; Kalden P; Pitton M; Requardt M; Thelen M
    Rofo; 2001 Apr; 173(4):350-5. PubMed ID: 11367845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of chronic carotid artery occlusion by non-contrast 3D-MERGE MR vessel wall imaging: comparison with 3D-TOF-MRA, contrast-enhanced MRA, and DSA.
    Zhang J; Ding S; Zhao H; Sun B; Li X; Zhou Y; Wan J; Degnan AJ; Xu J; Zhu C
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Nov; 30(11):5805-5814. PubMed ID: 32529567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Magnetic resonance angiography is an accurate imaging adjunct to duplex ultrasound scan in patient selection for carotid endarterectomy.
    Back MR; Wilson JS; Rushing G; Stordahl N; Linden C; Johnson BL; Bandyk DF
    J Vasc Surg; 2000 Sep; 32(3):429-38; discussion 439-40. PubMed ID: 10957649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. High-resolution contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the carotid arteries using fluoroscopic monitoring of contrast arrival: diagnostic accuracy and interobserver variability.
    Butz B; Dorenbeck U; Borisch I; Zorger N; Lenhart M; Feuerbach S; Link J
    Acta Radiol; 2004 Apr; 45(2):164-70. PubMed ID: 15191100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MR angiography: Diagnostic performance of four doses for detection and grading of carotid, renal, and aorto-iliac stenoses compared to digital subtraction angiography.
    Schneider G; Ballarati C; Grazioli L; Manfredi R; Thurnher S; Kroencke TJ; Taupitz M; Merlino B; Bonomo L; Shen N; Pirovano G; Kirchin MA; Spinazzi A
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Oct; 26(4):1020-32. PubMed ID: 17896354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Contrast-enhanced MRA of the carotid arteries using 0.5 Tesla: comparison with selective digital angiography].
    Barbier C; Lefèvre F; Bui P; Denny P; Aiouaz C; Becker S
    J Radiol; 2001 Mar; 82(3 Pt 1):245-9. PubMed ID: 11287855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Assessment of extracranial internal carotid artery stenosis by duplex scanning magnetic resonance angiography and digital subtraction angiography: a comparative study].
    Guo D; Wang Y; Fu W
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2000 Feb; 80(2):98-100. PubMed ID: 11798743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How should we estimate carotid stenosis using magnetic resonance angiography?
    Vanninen RL; Manninen HI; Partanen PK; Tulla H; Vainio PA
    Neuroradiology; 1996 May; 38(4):299-305. PubMed ID: 8738083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Preoperative assessment of the carotid bifurcation. Can magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasonography replace contrast arteriography?
    Patel MR; Kuntz KM; Klufas RA; Kim D; Kramer J; Polak JF; Skillman JJ; Whittemore AD; Edelman RR; Kent KC
    Stroke; 1995 Oct; 26(10):1753-8. PubMed ID: 7570720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Magnetic resonance angiography with contrast media in the study of carotid arteries].
    Catalano C; Laghi A; Pediconi F; Fraioli F; Napoli A; Passariello R
    Radiol Med; 2001; 101(1-2):54-9. PubMed ID: 11360754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Stenosis-occlusion of the carotid bifurcation. Angiography with MR and contrast media versus digital angiography].
    Scarabino T; Carriero A; Balzano S; Sciannelli V; Bonomo L; Salvolini U
    Radiol Med; 1998 Mar; 95(3):170-3. PubMed ID: 9638160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of CE-MRA for the rapid detection of supra-aortic vascular disease.
    Wright VL; Olan W; Dick B; Yu H; Alberts-Grill N; Latour LL; Baird AE
    Neurology; 2005 Jul; 65(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 16009882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.