These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14735661)

  • 1. Disclosure--fiduciary duty--primary care physician incentives. Horvath v. Keystone Health Plan East, Inc.
    Benefits Q; 2003; 19(4):87-9. PubMed ID: 14735661
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. HMOs--financial incentives--disclosure. Horvath v. Keystone Health Plan East, Inc.
    Benefits Q; 2005; 21(2):60-1. PubMed ID: 15977752
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fiduciary duty--HMOs--disclosure--physician compensation and financial incentives. Ehlmann v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of Texas, 198 F.3d 552 (5th Cir. 2000).
    Benefits Q; 2001; 17(3):72-3. PubMed ID: 11521555
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Patient advocates or patient adversaries? Using fiduciary law to compel disclosure of managed care financial incentives.
    Johnston K
    San Diego Law Rev; 1998; 35(4):951-92. PubMed ID: 12778919
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Complaint alleging breach of ERISA fiduciary obligation upheld. Shea v. Esensten.
    Hosp Law Newsl; 1997 Sep; 14(11):4-6. PubMed ID: 10184756
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prescription drug copayments--fiduciary duty--plan discounts--disclosure. Alves v. Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, Inc.
    Benefits Q; 2005; 21(2):61-3. PubMed ID: 15977753
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. ERISA: U.S. Supreme Court holds treatment decisions made by HMO physician-employees do not breach fiduciary duty.
    Netter W
    J Law Med Ethics; 2000; 28(3):309-11. PubMed ID: 11210385
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Supreme Court refuses to "precipitate the upheaval" in Pegram v. Herdrich.
    Torrance AB
    Health Care Law Mon; 2000 Jul; ():16-8. PubMed ID: 11066640
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fiduciaries--HMOs--incentives to ration care. Pegram v. Herdrich.
    Benefits Q; 2001; 17(2):61-3. PubMed ID: 11372475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Neade v. Portes: a physician's fiduciary duty to disclose financial incentives.
    Simmons J
    Univ Toledo Law Rev; 2000; 31(2):323-43. PubMed ID: 12625321
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. HMO liability for the use of financial incentive arrangements in the provision of health care.
    Terry BX
    Health Care Law Mon; 2000 Feb; ():3-12. PubMed ID: 10947557
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. U.S. Supreme Court validates HMO financial incentives and further undermines professionalism in the practice of medicine.
    Gale AH
    Mo Med; 2000 Oct; 97(10):475-6. PubMed ID: 11043028
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Employer sponsored health benefit plans under ERISA after Pegram v. Herdrich: the fiduciary duty argument and mixed eligibility versus treatment decisions.
    Karns JE
    J Law Health; 2000-2001; 15(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 11930500
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Supreme Court decides important HMO case involving physician incentives.
    Devlin MM
    J Med Pract Manage; 2000; 16(2):95-8. PubMed ID: 14608781
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In fiduciaries we trust.
    Sfikas PM
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1997 Sep; 128(9):1318-20. PubMed ID: 9297956
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Will ERISA law become a sword instead of a shield?
    Capitation Manag Rep; 1997 Aug; 4(8):129-31. PubMed ID: 10175789
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Litigating around ERISA to quality managed healthcare: an HMO can breach fiduciary duties.
    Karns JE
    Spec Law Dig Health Care Law; 2001 Mar; (263):9-30. PubMed ID: 11291401
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Law & psychiatry: Pegram v. Herdrich: the Supreme Court passes the buck on managed care.
    Appelbaum PS
    Psychiatr Serv; 2000 Oct; 51(10):1225-6, 1238. PubMed ID: 11013317
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pegram v. Herdrich: The Supreme Court confronts managed care.
    Jost TS
    Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2001; 1():187-93. PubMed ID: 12669328
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Disclosure of physician incentives: do practices satisfy purposes?
    Hall MA; Kidd KE; Dugan E
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2000; 19(4):156-64. PubMed ID: 10916969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.