617 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14736237)
1. Evaluation of docking performance: comparative data on docking algorithms.
Kontoyianni M; McClellan LM; Sokol GS
J Med Chem; 2004 Jan; 47(3):558-65. PubMed ID: 14736237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A detailed comparison of current docking and scoring methods on systems of pharmaceutical relevance.
Perola E; Walters WP; Charifson PS
Proteins; 2004 Aug; 56(2):235-49. PubMed ID: 15211508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A critical assessment of docking programs and scoring functions.
Warren GL; Andrews CW; Capelli AM; Clarke B; LaLonde J; Lambert MH; Lindvall M; Nevins N; Semus SF; Senger S; Tedesco G; Wall ID; Woolven JM; Peishoff CE; Head MS
J Med Chem; 2006 Oct; 49(20):5912-31. PubMed ID: 17004707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prediction of multiple binding modes of the CDK2 inhibitors, anilinopyrazoles, using the automated docking programs GOLD, FlexX, and LigandFit: an evaluation of performance.
Sato H; Shewchuk LM; Tang J
J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(6):2552-62. PubMed ID: 17125195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of library ranking efficacy in virtual screening.
Kontoyianni M; Sokol GS; McClellan LM
J Comput Chem; 2005 Jan; 26(1):11-22. PubMed ID: 15526325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of several molecular docking programs: pose prediction and virtual screening accuracy.
Cross JB; Thompson DC; Rai BK; Baber JC; Fan KY; Hu Y; Humblet C
J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Jun; 49(6):1455-74. PubMed ID: 19476350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Lead finder: an approach to improve accuracy of protein-ligand docking, binding energy estimation, and virtual screening.
Stroganov OV; Novikov FN; Stroylov VS; Kulkov V; Chilov GG
J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Dec; 48(12):2371-85. PubMed ID: 19007114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. ConsDock: A new program for the consensus analysis of protein-ligand interactions.
Paul N; Rognan D
Proteins; 2002 Jun; 47(4):521-33. PubMed ID: 12001231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Catalytic site prediction and virtual screening of cytochrome P450 2D6 substrates by consideration of water and rescoring in automated docking.
de Graaf C; Oostenbrink C; Keizers PH; van der Wijst T; Jongejan A; Vermeulen NP
J Med Chem; 2006 Apr; 49(8):2417-30. PubMed ID: 16610785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. High quality binding modes in docking ligands to proteins.
Gorelik B; Goldblum A
Proteins; 2008 May; 71(3):1373-86. PubMed ID: 18058908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validation studies of the site-directed docking program LibDock.
Rao SN; Head MS; Kulkarni A; LaLonde JM
J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(6):2159-71. PubMed ID: 17985863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The consequences of scoring docked ligand conformations using free energy correlations.
Spyrakis F; Amadasi A; Fornabaio M; Abraham DJ; Mozzarelli A; Kellogg GE; Cozzini P
Eur J Med Chem; 2007 Jul; 42(7):921-33. PubMed ID: 17346861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Surflex: fully automatic flexible molecular docking using a molecular similarity-based search engine.
Jain AN
J Med Chem; 2003 Feb; 46(4):499-511. PubMed ID: 12570372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Retrospective docking study of PDE4B ligands and an analysis of the behavior of selected scoring functions.
Mpamhanga CP; Chen B; McLay IM; Ormsby DL; Lindvall MK
J Chem Inf Model; 2005; 45(4):1061-74. PubMed ID: 16045302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative evaluation of eight docking tools for docking and virtual screening accuracy.
Kellenberger E; Rodrigo J; Muller P; Rognan D
Proteins; 2004 Nov; 57(2):225-42. PubMed ID: 15340911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Investigation of MM-PBSA rescoring of docking poses.
Thompson DC; Humblet C; Joseph-McCarthy D
J Chem Inf Model; 2008 May; 48(5):1081-91. PubMed ID: 18465849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Multiple active site corrections for docking and virtual screening.
Vigers GP; Rizzi JP
J Med Chem; 2004 Jan; 47(1):80-9. PubMed ID: 14695822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. GAsDock: a new approach for rapid flexible docking based on an improved multi-population genetic algorithm.
Li H; Li C; Gui C; Luo X; Chen K; Shen J; Wang X; Jiang H
Bioorg Med Chem Lett; 2004 Sep; 14(18):4671-6. PubMed ID: 15324886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. FDS: flexible ligand and receptor docking with a continuum solvent model and soft-core energy function.
Taylor RD; Jewsbury PJ; Essex JW
J Comput Chem; 2003 Oct; 24(13):1637-56. PubMed ID: 12926007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Protein structures in virtual screening: a case study with CDK2.
Thomas MP; McInnes C; Fischer PM
J Med Chem; 2006 Jan; 49(1):92-104. PubMed ID: 16392795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
