These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14736298)

  • 21. Recollection and familiarity in negative schizophrenia.
    Thoma P; Zoppelt D; Wiebel B; Daum I
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(3):430-5. PubMed ID: 15993449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Imaging recollection and familiarity in the medial temporal lobe: a three-component model.
    Diana RA; Yonelinas AP; Ranganath C
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2007 Sep; 11(9):379-86. PubMed ID: 17707683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effects of retention intervals on receiver operating characteristics in artificial grammar learning.
    Tunney RJ; Bezzina G
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 May; 125(1):37-50. PubMed ID: 16899208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Investigating strength and frequency effects in recognition memory using type-2 signal detection theory.
    Higham PA; Perfect TJ; Bruno D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jan; 35(1):57-80. PubMed ID: 19210081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Decision-making models of remember-know judgments: comment on Rotello, Macmillan, and Reeder (2004).
    Murdock B
    Psychol Rev; 2006 Jul; 113(3):648-56. PubMed ID: 16802885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Use of the process dissociation procedure to study the contextual effects on face recognition in schizophrenia: familiarity, associative recollection and discriminative recollection.
    Guillaume F; Guillem F; Tiberghien G; Martin F; Ganeva E; Germain M; Pampoulova T; Stip E; Lalonde P
    Psychiatry Res; 2007 Jan; 149(1-3):105-19. PubMed ID: 17125845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Four types of novelty-familiarity responses in associative recognition memory of humans.
    Düzel E; Habib R; Guderian S; Heinze HJ
    Eur J Neurosci; 2004 Mar; 19(5):1408-16. PubMed ID: 15016098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Six regularities of source recognition.
    Glanzer M; Hilford A; Kim K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Nov; 30(6):1176-95. PubMed ID: 15521797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Prefrontal and hippocampal contributions to visual associative recognition: interactions between cognitive control and episodic retrieval.
    Bunge SA; Burrows B; Wagner AD
    Brain Cogn; 2004 Nov; 56(2):141-52. PubMed ID: 15518931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Recognition ROCs are curvilinear-or are they? On premature arguments against the two-high-threshold model of recognition.
    Bröder A; Schütz J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 May; 35(3):587-606. PubMed ID: 19379038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Neural correlates of recollection and familiarity: a review of neuroimaging and patient data.
    Skinner EI; Fernandes MA
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Jun; 45(10):2163-79. PubMed ID: 17445844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Recollection and familiarity in hippocampal amnesia.
    Turriziani P; Serra L; Fadda L; Caltagirone C; Carlesimo GA
    Hippocampus; 2008; 18(5):469-80. PubMed ID: 18306303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Associative reinstatement: a novel approach to assessing associative memory in patients with unilateral temporal lobe excisions.
    Cohn M; McAndrews MP; Moscovitch M
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Nov; 47(13):2989-94. PubMed ID: 19591854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Remembering and knowing: electrophysiological distinctions at encoding but not retrieval.
    Voss JL; Paller KA
    Neuroimage; 2009 May; 46(1):280-9. PubMed ID: 19457375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Source ROCs are (typically) curvilinear: comment on Yonelinas (1999).
    Qin J; Raye CL; Johnson MK; Mitchell KJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Jul; 27(4):1110-5. PubMed ID: 11486922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Intra- and inter-item associations doubly dissociate the electrophysiological correlates of familiarity and recollection.
    Jäger T; Mecklinger A; Kipp KH
    Neuron; 2006 Nov; 52(3):535-45. PubMed ID: 17088218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Impairment of verbal recollection following ischemic damage to the right anterior hippocampus.
    Peters J; Thoma P; Koch B; Schwarz M; Daum I
    Cortex; 2009 May; 45(5):592-601. PubMed ID: 19019352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Associative recognition of face pairs by younger and older adults: the role of familiarity-based processing.
    Rhodes MG; Castel AD; Jacoby LL
    Psychol Aging; 2008 Jun; 23(2):239-49. PubMed ID: 18573000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Activation and binding in verbal working memory: a dual-process model for the recognition of nonwords.
    Oberauer K; Lange EB
    Cogn Psychol; 2009 Feb; 58(1):102-36. PubMed ID: 18757052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Exploring the recognition memory deficit in Parkinson's disease: estimates of recollection versus familiarity.
    Davidson PS; Anaki D; Saint-Cyr JA; Chow TW; Moscovitch M
    Brain; 2006 Jul; 129(Pt 7):1768-79. PubMed ID: 16714314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.