These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14736305)

  • 21. Thinking about the future moves attention to the right.
    Ouellet M; Santiago J; Funes MJ; Lupiáñez J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Feb; 36(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 20121292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Frames of reference in spatial language acquisition.
    Shusterman A; Li P
    Cogn Psychol; 2016 Aug; 88():115-61. PubMed ID: 27423134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Dynamic modulation of visual detection by auditory cues in spatial neglect.
    Golay L; Hauert CA; Greber C; Schnider A; Ptak R
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(9):1258-65. PubMed ID: 15949510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Combined expectancy effects are modulated by the relation between expectancy cues.
    Mattler U
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Feb; 57(2):193-221. PubMed ID: 14742174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Language within your reach: near-far perceptual space and spatial demonstratives.
    Coventry KR; Valdés B; Castillo A; Guijarro-Fuentes P
    Cognition; 2008 Sep; 108(3):889-95. PubMed ID: 18706538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Lateralization of egocentric and allocentric spatial processing after parietal brain lesions.
    Iachini T; Ruggiero G; Conson M; Trojano L
    Brain Cogn; 2009 Apr; 69(3):514-20. PubMed ID: 19070951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Separate mechanisms recruited by exogenous and endogenous spatial cues: evidence from a spatial Stroop paradigm.
    Funes MJ; Lupiáñez J; Milliken B
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Apr; 33(2):348-62. PubMed ID: 17469972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Developmental differences in giving directions: spatial frames of reference and mental rotation.
    Roberts RJ; Aman CJ
    Child Dev; 1993 Aug; 64(4):1258-70. PubMed ID: 8404267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Geometric cues, reference frames, and the equivalence of experienced-aligned and novel-aligned views in human spatial memory.
    Kelly JW; Sjolund LA; Sturz BR
    Cognition; 2013 Mar; 126(3):459-74. PubMed ID: 23305700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Inhibition within a reference frame during the interpretation of spatial language.
    Carlson LA; Van Deman SR
    Cognition; 2008 Jan; 106(1):384-407. PubMed ID: 17449023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The semantics of space: integrating linguistic typology and cognitive neuroscience.
    Kemmerer D
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(9):1607-21. PubMed ID: 16516934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Memory for object location and route direction in virtual large-scale space.
    Janzen G
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Mar; 59(3):493-508. PubMed ID: 16627352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Egocentric inference of object positions during reading and listening].
    Hörnig R; Eyferth K; Claus B
    Z Exp Psychol; 1999; 46(3):140-51. PubMed ID: 10474318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Asymmetric learning transfer between imagined viewer- and object-rotations: evidence of a hierarchical organization of spatial reference frames.
    Pellizzer G; Bâ MB; Zanello A; Merlo MC
    Brain Cogn; 2009 Dec; 71(3):272-8. PubMed ID: 19748718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Formation of spatial short-term memory in 18-54-month old children].
    Dashniani MG; Chkhikvishvili NTs; Aragveli RI; Noselidze AG; Naneĭshvili TL
    Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 2001; 51(3):315-9. PubMed ID: 11550638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Stepping into a map: initial heading direction influences spatial memory flexibility.
    Gagnon SA; Brunyé TT; Gardony A; Noordzij ML; Mahoney CR; Taylor HA
    Cogn Sci; 2014 Mar; 38(2):275-302. PubMed ID: 23855500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Retrograde amnesia: neither partial nor complete hippocampal lesions in rats result in preferential sparing of remote spatial memory, even after reminding.
    Martin SJ; de Hoz L; Morris RG
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(4):609-24. PubMed ID: 15716151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Control networks and hemispheric asymmetries in parietal cortex during attentional orienting in different spatial reference frames.
    Wilson KD; Woldorff MG; Mangun GR
    Neuroimage; 2005 Apr; 25(3):668-83. PubMed ID: 15808968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Apes' use of iconic cues in the object-choice task.
    Herrmann E; Melis AP; Tomasello M
    Anim Cogn; 2006 Apr; 9(2):118-30. PubMed ID: 16395566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Background visual cues and memory-guided reaching.
    Krigolson O; Heath M
    Hum Mov Sci; 2004 Dec; 23(6):861-77. PubMed ID: 15664677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.