These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14736306)

  • 1. Isolating the special component of face recognition: peripheral identification and a Mooney face.
    McKone E
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Jan; 30(1):181-97. PubMed ID: 14736306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Holistic processing for faces operates over a wide range of sizes but is strongest at identification rather than conversational distances.
    McKone E
    Vision Res; 2009 Jan; 49(2):268-83. PubMed ID: 19022276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparative case study of face recognition: the contribution of configural and part-based recognition systems, and their interaction.
    Rivest J; Moscovitch M; Black S
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Nov; 47(13):2798-811. PubMed ID: 19524599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Configural processing and face viewpoint.
    McKone E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Apr; 34(2):310-27. PubMed ID: 18377173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Holistic processing of faces: learning effects with Mooney faces.
    Latinus M; Taylor MJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Aug; 17(8):1316-27. PubMed ID: 16197686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. 18-Month-olds can perceive Mooney faces.
    Doi H; Koga T; Shinohara K
    Neurosci Res; 2009 Jul; 64(3):317-22. PubMed ID: 19428135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The recognition of emotional expression in prosopagnosia: decoding whole and part faces.
    Stephan BC; Breen N; Caine D
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2006 Nov; 12(6):884-95. PubMed ID: 17064450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Face recognition memory and configural processing: a developmental ERP study using upright, inverted, and contrast-reversed faces.
    Itier RJ; Taylor MJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Apr; 16(3):487-502. PubMed ID: 15072683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Face processing in humans and new world monkeys: the influence of experiential and ecological factors.
    Neiworth JJ; Hassett JM; Sylvester CJ
    Anim Cogn; 2007 Apr; 10(2):125-34. PubMed ID: 16909230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. When inverted faces are recognized: the role of configural information in face recognition.
    Leder H; Bruce V
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 May; 53(2):513-36. PubMed ID: 10881616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Face processing stages: impact of difficulty and the separation of effects.
    Latinus M; Taylor MJ
    Brain Res; 2006 Dec; 1123(1):179-87. PubMed ID: 17054923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Distinguishing the cause and consequence of face inversion: the perceptual field hypothesis.
    Rossion B
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Nov; 132(3):300-12. PubMed ID: 19747674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Spatial frequency tuning of upright and inverted face identification.
    Gaspar C; Sekuler AB; Bennett PJ
    Vision Res; 2008 Dec; 48(28):2817-26. PubMed ID: 18835403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. EEG phase synchrony differences across visual perception conditions may depend on recording and analysis methods.
    Trujillo LT; Peterson MA; Kaszniak AW; Allen JJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jan; 116(1):172-89. PubMed ID: 15589196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The horizontal and vertical relations in upright faces are transmitted by different spatial frequency ranges.
    Goffaux V
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 May; 128(1):119-26. PubMed ID: 18166166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Haptic face recognition and prosopagnosia.
    Kilgour AR; de Gelder B; Lederman SJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(6):707-12. PubMed ID: 15037050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Configural masking of faces: evidence for high-level interactions in face perception.
    Loffler G; Gordon GE; Wilkinson F; Goren D; Wilson HR
    Vision Res; 2005 Aug; 45(17):2287-97. PubMed ID: 15924942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Picture-plane inversion leads to qualitative changes of face perception.
    Rossion B
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jun; 128(2):274-89. PubMed ID: 18396260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Electrophysiological correlates of facial decision: insights from upright and upside-down Mooney-face perception.
    George N; Jemel B; Fiori N; Chaby L; Renault B
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Aug; 24(3):663-73. PubMed ID: 15890502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Rapid adaptation of the m170 response: importance of face parts.
    Harris A; Nakayama K
    Cereb Cortex; 2008 Feb; 18(2):467-76. PubMed ID: 17573371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.