These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

279 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14736367)

  • 1. From the five blind men to Cochrane Complementary Medicine systematic reviews.
    Ezzo J
    J Altern Complement Med; 2003 Dec; 9(6):969-72. PubMed ID: 14736367
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical research on acupuncture. Part 2. Controlled clinical trials, an overview of their methods.
    Birch S
    J Altern Complement Med; 2004 Jun; 10(3):481-98. PubMed ID: 15253852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical research on acupuncture. Part 1. What have reviews of the efficacy and safety of acupuncture told us so far?
    Birch S; Hesselink JK; Jonkman FA; Hekker TA; Bos A
    J Altern Complement Med; 2004 Jun; 10(3):468-80. PubMed ID: 15253851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Standards to improve the reporting of clinical trials in acupuncture.
    Hopewell S
    Acupunct Med; 2010 Jun; 28(2):63. PubMed ID: 20615857
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Heterogeneity in search strategies among Cochrane acupuncture reviews: is there room for improvement?
    Lui S; Smith EJ; Terplan M
    Acupunct Med; 2010 Sep; 28(3):149-53. PubMed ID: 20615852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Commentary on Sood et al.: "Cochrane systematic reviews in acupuncture: methodological diversity in database searching".
    Lao L
    J Altern Complement Med; 2005 Aug; 11(4):723-4. PubMed ID: 16131299
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bias in the trial and reporting of trials of homeopathy: a fundamental breakdown in peer review and standards?
    Frass M; Schuster E; Muchitsch I; Duncan J; Gei W; Kozel G; Kastinger-Mayr C; Felleitner AE; Reiter C; Endler C; Oberbaum M
    J Altern Complement Med; 2005 Oct; 11(5):780-2. PubMed ID: 16296904
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Testing a tool for the classification of study designs in systematic reviews of interventions and exposures showed moderate reliability and low accuracy.
    Hartling L; Bond K; Santaguida PL; Viswanathan M; Dryden DM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Aug; 64(8):861-71. PubMed ID: 21531537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Comments on methodological quality of systematic review/meta-analysis on acupuncture therapy in China].
    Xiong J; Du YH
    Zhen Ci Yan Jiu; 2011 Feb; 36(1):72-5. PubMed ID: 21585064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of acupuncture for stroke.
    Zhang JH; Wang D; Liu M
    Neuroepidemiology; 2014; 42(1):50-8. PubMed ID: 24356063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Complementary medicine and the Cochrane Collaboration.
    Ezzo J; Berman BM; Vickers AJ; Linde K
    JAMA; 1998 Nov; 280(18):1628-30. PubMed ID: 9820271
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cochrane reviews used more rigorous methods than non-Cochrane reviews: survey of systematic reviews in physiotherapy.
    Moseley AM; Elkins MR; Herbert RD; Maher CG; Sherrington C
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Oct; 62(10):1021-30. PubMed ID: 19282144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In vitro fertilization and acupuncture: clinical efficacy and mechanistic basis.
    Anderson BJ; Haimovici F; Ginsburg ES; Schust DJ; Wayne PM
    Altern Ther Health Med; 2007; 13(3):38-48. PubMed ID: 17515023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Quality of methodology and reporting of randomized controlled trials of acupuncture for obesity].
    Liu XM; Zhang MM; Du L
    Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2004 Apr; 26(2):192-4. PubMed ID: 15171560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Methodological quality of systematic reviews in subfertility: a comparison of Cochrane and non-Cochrane systematic reviews in assisted reproductive technologies.
    Windsor B; Popovich I; Jordan V; Showell M; Shea B; Farquhar C
    Hum Reprod; 2012 Dec; 27(12):3460-6. PubMed ID: 23034152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Failure to exclude false negative bias: a fundamental flaw in the trial of Shang et al.
    Kiene H; Kienle GS; von Schön-Angerer T
    J Altern Complement Med; 2005 Oct; 11(5):783. PubMed ID: 16296905
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Acupuncture: on what should its evidence base be based?
    Hammerschlag R
    Altern Ther Health Med; 2003; 9(5):34-5. PubMed ID: 14526709
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing the utility of the standards for reporting trials of acupuncture (STRICTA): a survey of authors.
    Prady SL; Macpherson H
    J Altern Complement Med; 2007 Nov; 13(9):939-43. PubMed ID: 18047440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Uptake of methods to deal with publication bias in systematic reviews has increased over time, but there is still much scope for improvement.
    Parekh-Bhurke S; Kwok CS; Pang C; Hooper L; Loke YK; Ryder JJ; Sutton AJ; Hing CB; Harvey I; Song F
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Apr; 64(4):349-57. PubMed ID: 20800992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis.
    Haase SC
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2011 Feb; 127(2):955-966. PubMed ID: 21285802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.