These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14736579)

  • 21. The nature of selective attention effects on auditory event-related potentials.
    Michie PT; Bearpark HM; Crawford JM; Glue LC
    Biol Psychol; 1990 Jun; 30(3):219-50. PubMed ID: 2282370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Alcohol-related ERP changes recorded from different modalities: a topographic analysis.
    Cohen HL; Ji J; Chorlian DB; Begleiter H; Porjesz B
    Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2002 Mar; 26(3):303-17. PubMed ID: 11923582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Mismatch negativity of the color modality during a selective attention task to auditory stimuli in children with mental retardation.
    Horimoto R; Inagaki M; Yano T; Sata Y; Kaga M
    Brain Dev; 2002 Oct; 24(7):703-9. PubMed ID: 12427518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Intra-modal and cross-modal spatial attention to auditory and visual stimuli. An event-related brain potential study.
    Teder-Sälejärvi WA; Münte TF; Sperlich F; Hillyard SA
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 1999 Oct; 8(3):327-43. PubMed ID: 10556609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Sounds can alter the perceived direction of a moving visual object.
    Teramoto W; Hidaka S; Sugita Y; Sakamoto S; Gyoba J; Iwaya Y; Suzuki Y
    J Vis; 2012 Mar; 12(3):. PubMed ID: 22410584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Attention modulates responses to motion reversals in human visual cortex.
    Tata MS; Mason AL; Sutherland RJ
    Neuroreport; 2007 Aug; 18(13):1361-5. PubMed ID: 17762713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Attentional Interactions Between Vision and Hearing in Event-Related Responses to Crossmodal and Conjunct Oddballs.
    Friedel EBN; Bach M; Heinrich SP
    Multisens Res; 2020 Jul; 33(3):251-275. PubMed ID: 31972541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Modality-specificity of sensory aging in vision and audition: evidence from event-related potentials.
    Ceponiene R; Westerfield M; Torki M; Townsend J
    Brain Res; 2008 Jun; 1215():53-68. PubMed ID: 18482717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Absence of direction-specific cross-modal visual-auditory adaptation in motion-onset event-related potentials.
    Grzeschik R; Lewald J; Verhey JL; Hoffmann MB; Getzmann S
    Eur J Neurosci; 2016 Jan; 43(1):66-77. PubMed ID: 26469706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Auditory and visual attention modulate motion processing in area MT+.
    Berman RA; Colby CL
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2002 Jun; 14(1):64-74. PubMed ID: 12063130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Stimulus complexity effects on the event-related potentials to task-irrelevant stimuli.
    Barkaszi I; Czigler I; Balázs L
    Biol Psychol; 2013 Sep; 94(1):82-9. PubMed ID: 23702457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effects of inter- and intramodal selective attention to non-spatial visual stimuli: an event-related potential analysis.
    de Ruiter MB; Kok A; van der Schoot M
    Biol Psychol; 1998 Nov; 49(3):269-94. PubMed ID: 9858057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Differences in the neural basis of automatic auditory and visual time perception: ERP evidence from an across-modal delayed response oddball task.
    Chen Y; Huang X; Luo Y; Peng C; Liu C
    Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 1325():100-11. PubMed ID: 20170647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. An analysis of audio-visual crossmodal integration by means of event-related potential (ERP) recordings.
    Teder-Sälejärvi WA; McDonald JJ; Di Russo F; Hillyard SA
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2002 Jun; 14(1):106-14. PubMed ID: 12063134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Cross-modal selective attention to visual and auditory stimuli modulates endogenous ERP components.
    Luo YJ; Wei JH
    Brain Res; 1999 Sep; 842(1):30-8. PubMed ID: 10526092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Unimodal and crossmodal gradients of spatial attention: Evidence from event-related potentials.
    Föcker J; Hötting K; Gondan M; Röder B
    Brain Topogr; 2010 Mar; 23(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 19821021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The spread of attention across modalities and space in a multisensory object.
    Busse L; Roberts KC; Crist RE; Weissman DH; Woldorff MG
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2005 Dec; 102(51):18751-6. PubMed ID: 16339900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Intramodal perceptual grouping modulates multisensory integration: evidence from the crossmodal dynamic capture task.
    Sanabria D; Soto-Faraco S; Chan J; Spence C
    Neurosci Lett; 2005 Mar; 377(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 15722188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Orienting attention to points in time improves stimulus processing both within and across modalities.
    Lange K; Röder B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 May; 18(5):715-29. PubMed ID: 16768372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A comparison of visual and auditory representational momentum in spatial tasks.
    Schmiedchen K; Freigang C; Rübsamen R; Richter N
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Oct; 75(7):1507-19. PubMed ID: 23864263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.